From: Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu>
To: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Dadap <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:43:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLa22EBqxE2sBdpp@bilrost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLZXQLh2Qmxs+CWU@intel.com>
Le Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 06:50:24PM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? a ?crit :
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46:41PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote:
> > The ACPI OpRegion Mailbox #5 ASLE extension may contain an EDID to be
> > used for the embedded display. Add support for using it via by adding
> > the EDID to the list of available modes on the connector, and use it for
> > eDP when available.
> >
> > If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the
> > ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>
> Looks like Windows uses the ACPI _DDC method instead. We should probably
> do the same, just in case some crazy machine stores the EDID somewhere
> else.
Thanks, I wouldn't have thought of this. It seems Daniel Dadap did a
patch series to do just that, in a generic way:
https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20200727205357.27839-1-ddadap@nvidia.com/
I've tried patch 1 & 2, and after a fix[1] was able to call the _DDC method
on most devices, but without any EDID being returned.
I looked at the disassembled ACPI tables[2], and could not find any
device with the _DDC method. Are you sure it's the only method the
Windows driver uses to get the EDID ?
Regards,
Anisse
[1] _DOD ids should only use 16 lower bits, see table here:
https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/Apx_B_Video_Extensions/display-specific-methods.html#dod-enumerate-all-devices-attached-to-the-display-adapter
[2] acpidump: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3454#note_913970
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu>
To: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Dadap <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:43:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLa22EBqxE2sBdpp@bilrost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLZXQLh2Qmxs+CWU@intel.com>
Le Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 06:50:24PM +0300, Ville Syrj?l? a ?crit :
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:46:41PM +0200, Anisse Astier wrote:
> > The ACPI OpRegion Mailbox #5 ASLE extension may contain an EDID to be
> > used for the embedded display. Add support for using it via by adding
> > the EDID to the list of available modes on the connector, and use it for
> > eDP when available.
> >
> > If a panel's EDID is broken, there may be an override EDID set in the
> > ACPI OpRegion mailbox #5. Use it if available.
>
> Looks like Windows uses the ACPI _DDC method instead. We should probably
> do the same, just in case some crazy machine stores the EDID somewhere
> else.
Thanks, I wouldn't have thought of this. It seems Daniel Dadap did a
patch series to do just that, in a generic way:
https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/20200727205357.27839-1-ddadap@nvidia.com/
I've tried patch 1 & 2, and after a fix[1] was able to call the _DDC method
on most devices, but without any EDID being returned.
I looked at the disassembled ACPI tables[2], and could not find any
device with the _DDC method. Are you sure it's the only method the
Windows driver uses to get the EDID ?
Regards,
Anisse
[1] _DOD ids should only use 16 lower bits, see table here:
https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/Apx_B_Video_Extensions/display-specific-methods.html#dod-enumerate-all-devices-attached-to-the-display-adapter
[2] acpidump: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3454#note_913970
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-01 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 20:46 [PATCH v2 0/2] GPD Win Max display fixes Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915/opregion: add support for mailbox #5 EDID Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Anisse Astier
2021-06-01 15:50 ` Ville Syrjälä
2021-06-01 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2021-06-01 22:43 ` Anisse Astier [this message]
2021-06-01 22:43 ` Anisse Astier
2021-07-07 19:57 ` Daniel Dadap
2021-07-07 19:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Dadap
2021-07-07 21:30 ` Anisse Astier
2021-07-07 21:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: Add orientation quirk for GPD Win Max Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Anisse Astier
2021-05-31 20:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for GPD Win Max display fixes (rev2) Patchwork
2021-05-31 20:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-05-31 21:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-05-31 22:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLa22EBqxE2sBdpp@bilrost \
--to=anisse@astier.eu \
--cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.