From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Cc: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com>,
Ross Schmidt <ross.schm.dev@gmail.com>,
Qiang Ma <maqianga@uniontech.com>,
Marco Cesati <marcocesati@gmail.com>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: fix some incorrect type warnings
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 11:18:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLieT3W39eSdwNZr@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1622708703-8561-1-git-send-email-wanjiabing@vivo.com>
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 04:24:59PM +0800, Wan Jiabing wrote:
> Fix some "incorrect type in assignment" in rtw_security.c.
>
> The sparse warings:
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:72:50: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:72:50: expected restricted __le32 [usertype]
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:72:50: got unsigned int
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:80:50: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:80:50: expected restricted __le32 [usertype]
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:80:50: got unsigned int
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:124:33: warning: cast to restricted __le32
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:509:58: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:509:58: expected restricted __le32 [usertype]
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:509:58: got unsigned int
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:517:58: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:517:58: expected restricted __le32 [usertype]
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:517:58: got unsigned int
> drivers/staging//rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:621:41: warning: cast to restricted __le32
>
> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> index a99f439..4760999 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ const char *security_type_str(u8 value)
> void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
> { /* exclude ICV */
>
> - unsigned char crc[4];
> + u8 crc[4];
Why change this?
>
> signed int curfragnum, length;
> u32 keylength;
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
>
> length = pattrib->last_txcmdsz-pattrib->hdrlen-pattrib->iv_len-pattrib->icv_len;
>
> - *((__le32 *)crc) = ~crc32_le(~0, payload, length);
> + *((__le32 *)crc) = cpu_to_le32(~crc32_le(~0, payload, length));
Are you sure this does what you think it does?
What exactly is this doing now?
>
> arc4_setkey(ctx, wepkey, 3 + keylength);
> arc4_crypt(ctx, payload, payload, length);
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ void rtw_wep_encrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pxmitframe)
>
> } else {
> length = pxmitpriv->frag_len-pattrib->hdrlen-pattrib->iv_len-pattrib->icv_len;
> - *((__le32 *)crc) = ~crc32_le(~0, payload, length);
> + *((__le32 *)crc) = cpu_to_le32(~crc32_le(~0, payload, length));
> arc4_setkey(ctx, wepkey, 3 + keylength);
> arc4_crypt(ctx, payload, payload, length);
> arc4_crypt(ctx, payload + length, crc, 4);
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void rtw_wep_decrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
> arc4_crypt(ctx, payload, payload, length);
>
> /* calculate icv and compare the icv */
> - *((u32 *)crc) = le32_to_cpu(~crc32_le(~0, payload, length - 4));
> + *((__le32 *)crc) = cpu_to_le32(~crc32_le(~0, payload, length - 4));
This odd casting feels wrong, why is it correct now?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-03 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 8:24 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: core: fix some incorrect type warnings Wan Jiabing
2021-06-03 8:36 ` Jiabing Wan
2021-06-03 8:36 ` Jiabing Wan
2021-06-03 9:17 ` [PATCH] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-06-03 9:18 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-06-04 2:19 ` Jiabing Wan
2021-06-04 2:19 ` Jiabing Wan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLieT3W39eSdwNZr@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fabioaiuto83@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maqianga@uniontech.com \
--cc=marcocesati@gmail.com \
--cc=ross.schm.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=wanjiabing@vivo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.