From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: trix@redhat.com
Cc: hao.wu@intel.com, mdf@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, dinguyen@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, nava.manne@xilinx.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, davidgow@google.com, fpacheco@redhat.com,
richard.gong@intel.com, luca@lucaceresoli.net,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:00:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMCRRm/lB2+gfpS9@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608162340.3010204-2-trix@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:23:33AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>
> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
>
> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
> FPGA_BLA.
Why did we get two 0/7 emails?
confused,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: trix@redhat.com
Cc: hao.wu@intel.com, mdf@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
michal.simek@xilinx.com, dinguyen@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, nava.manne@xilinx.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, davidgow@google.com, fpacheco@redhat.com,
richard.gong@intel.com, luca@lucaceresoli.net,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:00:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YMCRRm/lB2+gfpS9@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210608162340.3010204-2-trix@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:23:33AM -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>
> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
>
> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
> FPGA_BLA.
Why did we get two 0/7 emails?
confused,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-09 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-08 16:23 [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-09 10:00 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-06-09 10:00 ` Greg KH
2021-06-09 13:11 ` Tom Rix
2021-06-09 13:11 ` Tom Rix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] fpga: dfl: reorganize to subdir layout trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] fpga: xilinx: " trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] fpga: altera: " trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] fpga: lattice: " trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] fpga: dfl: remove dfl- prefix on files trix
2021-06-08 16:23 ` trix
2021-06-09 9:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] fpga: reorganize to subdirs Greg KH
2021-06-09 9:58 ` Greg KH
2021-06-09 13:17 trix
2021-06-09 13:17 ` trix
2021-06-09 13:17 ` trix
2021-06-09 13:17 ` trix
2021-06-09 13:21 trix
2021-06-09 13:21 ` trix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YMCRRm/lB2+gfpS9@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=fpacheco@redhat.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=nava.manne@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard.gong@intel.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.