Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf cs-etm: Split --dump-raw-trace by AUX records

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, al.grant@arm.com,
	branislav.rankov@arm.com, denik@chromium.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] perf cs-etm: Split --dump-raw-trace by AUX records
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 17:10:34 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPXcOrkjYdUJ3iRl@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719163336.GA2255168@p14s>

Em Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:33:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:45:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:33:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 05:43:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> > > > for example:
> > > > 
> > > >         Idx:808; ID:1c; I_BAD_SEQUENCE : Invalid Sequence in packet.[I_ASYNC]
> > > >         ...
> > > >         PKTP_ETMV4I_0016 : 0x0014 (OCSD_ERR_INVALID_PCKT_HDR) [Invalid packet header]; TrcIdx=822
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks, applied.
> 
> This patch is the second of a two patch series[1][2].  The first one was applied and
> is in Linus' current master branch.  But I can't find the second one in
> either your core branch or Linus', and that despite your reply above that it has been
> applied.  As such I am guessing something went wrong with the process.  
> 
> How do you want to proceed - should we resend the second patch[2] or you still
> have it somewhere in your Inbox?

My bad, its no in tmp.perf/urgent, after testing together with other
patches will move to perf/urgent and by the end of this week I'll submit
it to Linus, sorry.

- Arnaldo

> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006575.html
> [2]. https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/coresight/2021-June/006576.html
> 
> > 
> > - Arnaldo
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo