Re: [RFC v5 8/8] PCI: hv: Turn on the host bridge probing on ARM64

From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Sunil Muthuswamy" <sunilmut@microsoft.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 8/8] PCI: hv: Turn on the host bridge probing on ARM64
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:59:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPbk3Ya20z1PDn2H@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v95582zh.wl-maz@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:38:26PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:44:29 +0100,
> Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Now we have everything we need, just provide a proper sysdata type for
> > the bus to use on ARM64 and everything else works.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > index e6276aaa4659..62dbe98d1fe1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
> >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> >  #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > @@ -448,7 +449,11 @@ enum hv_pcibus_state {
> >  };
> >  
> >  struct hv_pcibus_device {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> >  	struct pci_sysdata sysdata;
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> > +	struct pci_config_window sysdata;
> > +#endif
> 
> Am I the only one who find this rather odd? Nothing ever populates
> this data structure on arm64, and its only purpose seems to serve as
> an anchor to retrieve the hbus via container_of().
> 

This field will also be used as the ->sysdata of pci_bus and
pci_host_bridge, and some of the PCI core code touches. Although I made
this field as all zeroed and make sure PCI core can handle (patch #4).

> If that's indeed the case, I'd rather see an arch-specific to_hbus()
> helper that uses another (preexisting) field as the anchor for arm64.
> 

I did a quick look, but I didn't find another field works: the field
needs to be placed inside hv_pcibus_device and the address can be
retrieved via pci_bus. I'm open to any suggestion in case that I missed
something.

Regards,
Boqun

> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> -- 
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.