All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
	Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change fiemap way in printing compression chunk
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:35:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPiTLwB3d8BWSKje@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721072048.3035928-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:20:48AM -0700, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> 
> When we print out a discontinuous compression chunk, it shows like a
> continuous chunk now. To show it more correctly, I've changed the way of
> printing fiemap info like below. Plus, eliminated NEW_ADDR(-1) in fiemap
> info, since it is not in fiemap user api manual.
> 
> 0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 1: 0000000000001000 0000000f15c0f000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 2: 0000000000002000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 3: 0000000000004000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 4: 0000000000005000 0000000f15c10000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 5: 0000000000006000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 6: 0000000000008000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)

Please label these columns.

Anyway, this doesn't appear to work quite in the way I had in mind.  With this
patch, what I'm seeing is:

$ head -c 16384 /dev/zero > file; xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" file
file:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..7]:          0..7                 8 0x1008
   1: [8..15]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   2: [16..31]:        0..15               16 0x1809

So, working in 512-byte sectors, the logical sectors 0-31 are stored as one
compressed cluster in the 8 physical sectors 2683128-2683135.

The problem is, with this patch these physical sectors are reported at logical
sectors 8-15 instead of 0-7.  Obviously, this isn't particularly well-defined,
but I thought it was logical for the physical blocks to be associated with the
first logical blocks.  That is what the tests I've written (xfstest f2fs/002,
and the Android vts_kernel_encryption_test) assume.

Is there any particular reason why you wouldn't report instead:

   0: [0..7]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   1: [8..31]:        0..23                8 0x1809

- Eric

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change fiemap way in printing compression chunk
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 14:35:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YPiTLwB3d8BWSKje@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721072048.3035928-1-daeho43@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 12:20:48AM -0700, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> 
> When we print out a discontinuous compression chunk, it shows like a
> continuous chunk now. To show it more correctly, I've changed the way of
> printing fiemap info like below. Plus, eliminated NEW_ADDR(-1) in fiemap
> info, since it is not in fiemap user api manual.
> 
> 0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 1: 0000000000001000 0000000f15c0f000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 2: 0000000000002000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 3: 0000000000004000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 4: 0000000000005000 0000000f15c10000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)
> 5: 0000000000006000 0000000000000000 0000000000002000 1808 (M/U/E)
> 6: 0000000000008000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 1008 (M/E)

Please label these columns.

Anyway, this doesn't appear to work quite in the way I had in mind.  With this
patch, what I'm seeing is:

$ head -c 16384 /dev/zero > file; xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" file
file:
 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      TOTAL FLAGS
   0: [0..7]:          0..7                 8 0x1008
   1: [8..15]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   2: [16..31]:        0..15               16 0x1809

So, working in 512-byte sectors, the logical sectors 0-31 are stored as one
compressed cluster in the 8 physical sectors 2683128-2683135.

The problem is, with this patch these physical sectors are reported at logical
sectors 8-15 instead of 0-7.  Obviously, this isn't particularly well-defined,
but I thought it was logical for the physical blocks to be associated with the
first logical blocks.  That is what the tests I've written (xfstest f2fs/002,
and the Android vts_kernel_encryption_test) assume.

Is there any particular reason why you wouldn't report instead:

   0: [0..7]:         2683128..2683135     8 0x1008
   1: [8..31]:        0..23                8 0x1809

- Eric


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21  7:20 [PATCH] f2fs: change fiemap way in printing compression chunk Daeho Jeong
2021-07-21  7:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2021-07-21 21:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-07-21 21:35   ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-21 22:30   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-21 22:30     ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  0:15     ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  0:15       ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  1:04       ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  1:04         ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  1:15         ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  1:15           ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  1:40           ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  1:40             ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  1:56             ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  1:56               ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  3:59               ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  3:59                 ` Daeho Jeong
     [not found]               ` <CACOAw_yfG494AK=XH_xzeTDWn-a1mYF+537=VTT6oX6RgLGxnw@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-22 14:34                 ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22 16:10                   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22 16:17                     ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22 16:26                       ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22 16:33                         ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22 17:36                           ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22 17:55                             ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22 17:57                               ` Eric Biggers
2021-07-22  6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22  6:24   ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-22  6:39   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-07-22  6:39     ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YPiTLwB3d8BWSKje@gmail.com \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.