All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:33:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSa3DPBIFZ5P17vt@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823170151.1434772-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>

We must flush all the dirty data when enabling checkpoint back. Let's guarantee
that first. In order to mitigate any failure, let's flush data in fsync as well
during checkpoint=disable.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
v2 from v1:
 - handle sync_inodes_sb() failure

 fs/f2fs/file.c  |  5 ++---
 fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cc2080866c54..3330efb41f22 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -263,8 +263,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 	};
 	unsigned int seq_id = 0;
 
-	if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb) ||
-				is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
+	if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb)))
 		return 0;
 
 	trace_f2fs_sync_file_enter(inode);
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 	ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
 	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
 
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret || is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
 		trace_f2fs_sync_file_exit(inode, cp_reason, datasync, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 49e153fd8183..d2f97dfb17af 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -2088,8 +2088,17 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
 static void f2fs_enable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
+	int retry = DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT;
+
 	/* we should flush all the data to keep data consistency */
-	sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+	do {
+		sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+		cond_resched();
+		congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
+	} while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA) && retry--);
+
+	if (unlikely(!retry))
+		f2fs_warn(sbi, "checkpoint=enable has some unwritten data.");
 
 	down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
 	f2fs_dirty_to_prefree(sbi);
-- 
2.33.0.rc2.250.ged5fa647cd-goog


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:33:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSa3DPBIFZ5P17vt@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823170151.1434772-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>

We must flush all the dirty data when enabling checkpoint back. Let's guarantee
that first. In order to mitigate any failure, let's flush data in fsync as well
during checkpoint=disable.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
v2 from v1:
 - handle sync_inodes_sb() failure

 fs/f2fs/file.c  |  5 ++---
 fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cc2080866c54..3330efb41f22 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -263,8 +263,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 	};
 	unsigned int seq_id = 0;
 
-	if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb) ||
-				is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)))
+	if (unlikely(f2fs_readonly(inode->i_sb)))
 		return 0;
 
 	trace_f2fs_sync_file_enter(inode);
@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 	ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
 	clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_NEED_IPU);
 
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret || is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
 		trace_f2fs_sync_file_exit(inode, cp_reason, datasync, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 49e153fd8183..d2f97dfb17af 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -2088,8 +2088,17 @@ static int f2fs_disable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 
 static void f2fs_enable_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 {
+	int retry = DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT;
+
 	/* we should flush all the data to keep data consistency */
-	sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+	do {
+		sync_inodes_sb(sbi->sb);
+		cond_resched();
+		congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
+	} while (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_DATA) && retry--);
+
+	if (unlikely(!retry))
+		f2fs_warn(sbi, "checkpoint=enable has some unwritten data.");
 
 	down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
 	f2fs_dirty_to_prefree(sbi);
-- 
2.33.0.rc2.250.ged5fa647cd-goog



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-23 17:01 [PATCH] f2fs: don't ignore writing pages on fsync during checkpoint=disable Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-23 17:01 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24  1:08 ` Chao Yu
2021-08-24  1:08   ` Chao Yu
2021-08-24 17:09   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24 17:09     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-24 23:30     ` Chao Yu
2021-08-24 23:30       ` Chao Yu
2021-08-25 21:31       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-25 21:31         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-25 21:33 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2021-08-25 21:33   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-26  0:16   ` Chao Yu
2021-08-26  0:16     ` Chao Yu
2021-08-26 16:52   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-26 16:52     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-08-27 14:36     ` Chao Yu
2021-08-27 14:36       ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YSa3DPBIFZ5P17vt@google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.