From: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN()
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:57:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUUdW2fb8wC+ClX0@zacax395.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917154830.GM2515@art_vandelay>
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END((&dev_priv->drm), ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret here
Done!
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
>
> Check ret here and return an error if it's != 0
Done!
> > @@ -1194,14 +1195,11 @@ int intel_overlay_put_image_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > if (ret != 0)
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > out_unlock:
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> > +
> > + if (params->flags & I915_OVERLAY_ENABLE)
> > + i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
>
> This function refactor is a bit more involved than the
> s/drm_modeset_lock_all/DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_*/ changes in the rest of the patch.
> Could you split it out into a separate patch so it's not hidden away?
Sure, no problem.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN()
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:57:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUUdW2fb8wC+ClX0@zacax395.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917154830.GM2515@art_vandelay>
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END((&dev_priv->drm), ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret here
Done!
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
>
> Check ret here and return an error if it's != 0
Done!
> > @@ -1194,14 +1195,11 @@ int intel_overlay_put_image_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > if (ret != 0)
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > out_unlock:
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> > +
> > + if (params->flags & I915_OVERLAY_ENABLE)
> > + i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
>
> This function refactor is a bit more involved than the
> s/drm_modeset_lock_all/DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_*/ changes in the rest of the patch.
> Could you split it out into a separate patch so it's not hidden away?
Sure, no problem.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@u92.eu>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN()
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:57:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUUdW2fb8wC+ClX0@zacax395.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917154830.GM2515@art_vandelay>
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END((&dev_priv->drm), ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret here
Done!
> > + struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> > int i;
> > + int ret;
>
> Please move up with i
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Return ret
Done!
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >
>
> Check ret here and return an error if it's != 0
Done!
> > @@ -1194,14 +1195,11 @@ int intel_overlay_put_image_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > if (ret != 0)
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > out_unlock:
> > - drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > - i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
> > + DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> > +
> > + if (params->flags & I915_OVERLAY_ENABLE)
> > + i915_gem_object_put(new_bo);
>
> This function refactor is a bit more involved than the
> s/drm_modeset_lock_all/DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_*/ changes in the rest of the patch.
> Could you split it out into a separate patch so it's not hidden away?
Sure, no problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-17 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 139+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-16 21:15 [PATCH 00/15] drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers where possible Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 01/15] dmr: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all_ctx() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN() Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:28 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:28 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:07 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:07 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 02/15] dmr/i915: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:31 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:31 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 03/15] dmr/msm: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:29 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:29 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:29 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-20 1:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-20 1:54 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-20 1:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-09-20 1:54 ` [Nouveau] " kernel test robot
2021-09-20 21:25 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-20 21:25 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-20 21:25 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-20 21:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 04/15] drm: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:35 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:35 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 05/15] drm/vmwgfx: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:37 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:37 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 06/15] drm/tegra: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:38 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:38 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:34 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:34 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 07/15] drm/shmobile: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:38 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:38 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 08/15] drm/radeon: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:40 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:40 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:32 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:32 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 09/15] drm/omapdrm: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:40 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:40 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:41 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:41 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:37 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:37 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 10/15] drm/nouveau: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:42 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:42 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 11/15] drm/msm: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:42 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:42 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:41 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:41 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:48 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:48 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 22:57 ` Fernando Ramos [this message]
2021-09-17 22:57 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 13/15] drm/gma500: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:49 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:49 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 14/15] drm/amd: " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:55 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:55 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 23:17 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 23:17 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 23:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-18 9:42 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-18 9:42 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-18 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [PATCH 15/15] doc: drm: remove TODO entry regarding DRM_MODSET_LOCK_ALL cleanup Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 21:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:56 ` Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 15:56 ` [Nouveau] " Sean Paul
2021-09-17 23:21 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 23:21 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-16 23:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm: cleanup: Use DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_* helpers where possible Patchwork
2021-09-17 6:19 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 15:24 ` [PATCH 00/15] " Daniel Vetter
2021-09-17 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-09-17 15:24 ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Vetter
2021-09-17 21:41 ` Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 21:41 ` [Nouveau] " Fernando Ramos
2021-09-17 21:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Fernando Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUUdW2fb8wC+ClX0@zacax395.localdomain \
--to=greenfoo@u92.eu \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.