From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18. Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:24:29 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YW64/Y8RgU63BYY2@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20211014134731.4a5vgdklj3sjyfks@linutronix.de> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:47:31PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-10-14 15:21:22 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > c7fcbf2513973 -> does not boot > > > c7fcbf2513973 + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > 6f11f37459d8f -> boots, 0 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > 6f11f37459d8f + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > > Just to check, you've built 6f11f37459d8f, and then you cherry-picked > > 2f425cf5242a0 on top (not merged), and that already got you the warning > > flood? > > Correct. > > > I'm probably blind, but I'm really not seeing where this pile of > > properties is coming from. Can you pls also boot with drm.debug=0xe and > > attach full dmesg? Plus your .config please. > > attached. dmesg.txt is 6f11f37459d8f and the other is 6f11f37459d8f + > 2f425cf5242a0. Ah dmesg help me understand what's going on. Does the below patch help? If it's this one that would also explain why intel CI hasn't hit it - it's a leak between tests and we run them all individually instead of once at boot-up. Cheers, Daniel diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c index 1c19a5d3eefb..8d8d8e214c28 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static void mock_setup(struct drm_plane_state *state) mock_device.driver = &mock_driver; mock_device.mode_config.prop_fb_damage_clips = &mock_prop; mock_plane.dev = &mock_device; + mock_obj_props.count = 0; mock_plane.base.properties = &mock_obj_props; mock_prop.base.id = 1; /* 0 is an invalid id */ mock_prop.dev = &mock_device; -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18. Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:24:29 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YW64/Y8RgU63BYY2@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20211014134731.4a5vgdklj3sjyfks@linutronix.de> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:47:31PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2021-10-14 15:21:22 [+0200], Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:35:48PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > c7fcbf2513973 -> does not boot > > > c7fcbf2513973 + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > 6f11f37459d8f -> boots, 0 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > 6f11f37459d8f + 2f425cf5242a0 -> boots, 18 x DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY > > > > Just to check, you've built 6f11f37459d8f, and then you cherry-picked > > 2f425cf5242a0 on top (not merged), and that already got you the warning > > flood? > > Correct. > > > I'm probably blind, but I'm really not seeing where this pile of > > properties is coming from. Can you pls also boot with drm.debug=0xe and > > attach full dmesg? Plus your .config please. > > attached. dmesg.txt is 6f11f37459d8f and the other is 6f11f37459d8f + > 2f425cf5242a0. Ah dmesg help me understand what's going on. Does the below patch help? If it's this one that would also explain why intel CI hasn't hit it - it's a leak between tests and we run them all individually instead of once at boot-up. Cheers, Daniel diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c index 1c19a5d3eefb..8d8d8e214c28 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/selftests/test-drm_damage_helper.c @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static void mock_setup(struct drm_plane_state *state) mock_device.driver = &mock_driver; mock_device.mode_config.prop_fb_damage_clips = &mock_prop; mock_plane.dev = &mock_device; + mock_obj_props.count = 0; mock_plane.base.properties = &mock_obj_props; mock_prop.base.id = 1; /* 0 is an invalid id */ mock_prop.dev = &mock_device; -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-19 12:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-05 6:51 [RFC PATCH] drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-05 6:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-05 7:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork 2021-10-05 8:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-10-05 10:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork 2021-10-13 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH] " Daniel Vetter 2021-10-13 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-10-13 12:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-13 12:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-13 12:57 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-10-13 12:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-10-13 17:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-13 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-14 13:21 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-10-14 13:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2021-10-14 13:47 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-14 13:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-19 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter [this message] 2021-10-19 12:24 ` Daniel Vetter 2021-10-19 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-19 13:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-10-19 17:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY by 18. (rev2) Patchwork 2021-10-19 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YW64/Y8RgU63BYY2@phenom.ffwll.local \ --to=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \ --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \ --cc=mripard@kernel.org \ --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.