Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/smmuv3: Support devicetree - Jean-Philippe Brucker

From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, leo.yan@linaro.org,
	uchida.jun@socionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf/smmuv3: Support devicetree
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 17:20:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZPoYSIU/hBYgt3m@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54be6173-59d3-7ce8-e04b-b5197fdc0e10@arm.com>

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 05:00:14PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-11-16 15:42, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:02:47PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2021-11-16 11:35, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > > > Add devicetree binding for the SMMUv3 PMU, called Performance Monitoring
> > > > Counter Group (PMCG) in the spec. Each SMMUv3 implementation can have
> > > > multiple independent PMCGs, for example one for the Translation Control
> > > > Unit (TCU) and one per Translation Buffer Unit (TBU).
> > > > 
> > > > I previously sent the binding as reply to Jay Chen's thread implementing
> > > > device tree support [1]. This posting addresses the comments from that
> > > > thread.
> > > 
> > > Ha, I'd also resurrected this and was planning to post it at some point this
> > > week[0] - you should have said :)
> > 
> > Ah sorry about that, I just resent because there was some demand for it at
> > Linaro
> 
> Heh, no worries - it's not like you were even CC'ed on the thread where I
> only mentioned I *might* do it.
> 
> Can I get away with being cheeky and just saying that my review comments are
> the diff between my branch and yours, I wonder...

Sure, that works for me, I'll send a v2 this week or so

Thanks,
Jean