All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	syzbot <syzbot+7cd473c2cac13fd2dd72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in folio_mark_dirty
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:00:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya/ZaxznaTmrIvdO@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya/Ueh7MWyvV2zdg@google.com>

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:39:06PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 12/07, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > >  <TASK>
> > > >  folio_mark_dirty+0x136/0x270 mm/page-writeback.c:2639
> > 
> >         if (likely(mapping)) {
> > ...
> >                 if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
> >                         folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
> >                 return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(&folio->page);
> > 
> > how do we get to a NULL ->set_page_dirty for a metadata page's
> > mapping->a_ops?  This is definitely an f2fs expert question.
> 
> I can't find anything in f2fs, since that page was got by f2fs_grab_meta_page
> along with grab_cache_page() that we never unlocked it.
> 
>   40 struct page *f2fs_grab_meta_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t index)
>   41 {
>   42         struct address_space *mapping = META_MAPPING(sbi);
>   43         struct page *page;
>   44 repeat:
>   45         page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(mapping, index, false);
> 
>                     -> grab_cache_page(mapping, index);
> 
>   46         if (!page) {
>   47                 cond_resched();
>   48                 goto repeat;
>   49         }
>   50         f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, META, true, true);
>   51         if (!PageUptodate(page))
>   52                 SetPageUptodate(page);
>   53         return page;
>   54 }
> 
> 
> Suspecting something in folio wrt folio_mapping()?
> 
>  81 bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>  82 {
>  83         return folio_mark_dirty(page_folio(page));
>  84 }

... huh?  How could folio_mapping() be getting this wrong?
page_folio() does the same thing as compound_head() -- as far as I know
you don't use compound pages for f2fs metadata, so this basically just
casts the page to a struct folio.

folio_mapping() is just like the old page_mapping() (see commit
2f52578f9c64).  Unless you've done something like set the swapcache
bit on your metadata page, it's just going to return folio->mapping
(ie the same as page->mapping).


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+7cd473c2cac13fd2dd72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in folio_mark_dirty
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:00:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ya/ZaxznaTmrIvdO@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya/Ueh7MWyvV2zdg@google.com>

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:39:06PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 12/07, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > >  <TASK>
> > > >  folio_mark_dirty+0x136/0x270 mm/page-writeback.c:2639
> > 
> >         if (likely(mapping)) {
> > ...
> >                 if (folio_test_reclaim(folio))
> >                         folio_clear_reclaim(folio);
> >                 return mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty(&folio->page);
> > 
> > how do we get to a NULL ->set_page_dirty for a metadata page's
> > mapping->a_ops?  This is definitely an f2fs expert question.
> 
> I can't find anything in f2fs, since that page was got by f2fs_grab_meta_page
> along with grab_cache_page() that we never unlocked it.
> 
>   40 struct page *f2fs_grab_meta_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t index)
>   41 {
>   42         struct address_space *mapping = META_MAPPING(sbi);
>   43         struct page *page;
>   44 repeat:
>   45         page = f2fs_grab_cache_page(mapping, index, false);
> 
>                     -> grab_cache_page(mapping, index);
> 
>   46         if (!page) {
>   47                 cond_resched();
>   48                 goto repeat;
>   49         }
>   50         f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback(page, META, true, true);
>   51         if (!PageUptodate(page))
>   52                 SetPageUptodate(page);
>   53         return page;
>   54 }
> 
> 
> Suspecting something in folio wrt folio_mapping()?
> 
>  81 bool set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
>  82 {
>  83         return folio_mark_dirty(page_folio(page));
>  84 }

... huh?  How could folio_mapping() be getting this wrong?
page_folio() does the same thing as compound_head() -- as far as I know
you don't use compound pages for f2fs metadata, so this basically just
casts the page to a struct folio.

folio_mapping() is just like the old page_mapping() (see commit
2f52578f9c64).  Unless you've done something like set the swapcache
bit on your metadata page, it's just going to return folio->mapping
(ie the same as page->mapping).



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-07 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-04  9:55 [syzbot] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in folio_mark_dirty syzbot
2021-12-07  1:56 ` Andrew Morton
2021-12-07  1:56   ` [f2fs-dev] " Andrew Morton
2021-12-07  4:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-07  4:19     ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-07  4:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-07  4:30     ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-07 21:39     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-12-07 21:39       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-12-07 22:00       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-12-07 22:00         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-12-07 22:10         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-12-07 22:10           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-12-12  9:15           ` Chao Yu
2021-12-12  9:15             ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ya/ZaxznaTmrIvdO@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=syzbot+7cd473c2cac13fd2dd72@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.