All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tests/xfs: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:19:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ybyqf6OPsFt/X73C@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211117180105.GP24282@magnolia>

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 10:01:05AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:00:53AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks
> > does not leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This
> > triggers assert failures and free space accounting corruption on
> > XFS.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > v2:
> > - Explicitly set COW extent size hint.
> > - Move to tests/xfs.
> > - Various minor cleanups.
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20211021163959.1887011-1-bfoster@redhat.com/
> > 
> >  tests/xfs/999     | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/xfs/999.out |  2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/999
> >  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/999.out
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/999 b/tests/xfs/999
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 00000000..f27972bc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/999
> > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> > +#! /bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +# Copyright (c) 2021 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> > +#
> > +# FS QA Test 999
> > +#
> > +# Test that COW writeback that overlaps non-shared delalloc blocks does not
> > +# leave around stale delalloc blocks on I/O failure. This triggers assert
> > +# failures and free space accounting corruption on XFS.
> > +#
> > +. ./common/preamble
> > +_begin_fstest auto quick clone
> > +
> > +_cleanup()
> > +{
> > +	_cleanup_flakey
> > +	cd /
> > +	rm -r -f $tmp.*
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Import common functions.
> > +. ./common/reflink
> > +. ./common/dmflakey
> > +
> > +# real QA test starts here
> > +_supported_fs xfs
> > +_require_scratch_reflink
> > +_require_cp_reflink
> > +_require_xfs_io_command "cowextsize"
> > +_require_flakey_with_error_writes
> > +
> > +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
> > +_init_flakey
> > +_mount_flakey
> > +
> > +blksz=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT)
> > +
> > +# Set the COW extent size hint to guarantee COW fork preallocation occurs over a
> > +# bordering block offset.
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "cowextsize $((blksz * 2))" $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> > +
> > +# create two files that share a single block
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite $blksz $blksz" $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 >> $seqres.full
> > +_cp_reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file1 $SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> > +
> > +# Perform a buffered write across the shared and non-shared blocks. On XFS, this
> > +# creates a COW fork extent that covers the shared block as well as the just
> > +# created non-shared delalloc block. Fail the writeback to verify that all
> > +# delayed allocation is cleaned up properly.
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ERROR_WRITES
> > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite 0 $((blksz * 2))" \
> > +	-c fsync $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 >> $seqres.full
> > +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
> 
> Hmm.  So I've been running this test in my djwong-dev tree and hit this
> last night:
> 
> --- xfs/999.out
> +++ xfs/999.out.bad
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>  QA output created by 999
> -fsync: Input/output error
> +stat: Input/output error
> +cp: failed to access '/opt/file3': Input/output error
> 
> Digging into the kernel log, I see this happen:
> 
> [10240.821719] XFS (dm-0): Mounting V5 Filesystem
> [10240.855461] XFS (dm-0): Ending clean mount
> [10240.857030] XFS (dm-0): Quotacheck needed: Please wait.
> [10240.860095] XFS (dm-0): Quotacheck: Done.
> [10240.977055] XFS (dm-0): log I/O error -5
> [10240.977459] XFS (dm-0): Log I/O Error (0x2) detected at xlog_ioend_work+0x5f/0xb0 [xfs] (fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:1377).  Shutting down filesystem.
> [10240.978682] XFS (dm-0): Please unmount the filesystem and rectify the problem(s)
> [10241.044886] XFS (dm-0): Unmounting Filesystem
> 
> I guess the log tried to checkpoint for the brief window where the
> flakey table was enabled, and shut down the whole fs?  I don't have any
> good ideas for how to solve this, though.
> 
> Hm.  What if you did something like:
> 
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c 'pwrite...' $SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> _load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ERROR_WRITES
> $XFS_IO_PROG -c 'sync_range -wa' $SCRATCH_MNT/file2
> +_load_flakey_table $FLAKEY_ALLOW_WRITES
> 

I notice that sync_range doesn't combine options like that even though
the underlying flags can be combined for the syscall. That aside, I
suspect a combination of an fsync on the earlier reflink command and a
couple sync_range calls here (to achieve the intended behavior above) is
probably the best option to try and avoid this. That seems to preserve
the intended behavior of the test and I don't see any spurious failures
in a couple hundred or so iterations.. (granted I don't know how
reproducible that was in the first place).

Brian

> to constrain the window in which disk write will fail?  Seeing as s_f_r
> doesn't actually tell the fs to flush its own metadata or anything.
> 
> (Yikes, did I finally find a use for sync_file_range??)
> 
> --D
> 
> > +
> > +# Try a post-fail reflink and then unmount. Both of these are known to produce
> > +# errors and/or assert failures on XFS if we trip over a stale delalloc block.
> > +_cp_reflink $SCRATCH_MNT/file2 $SCRATCH_MNT/file3
> > +_unmount_flakey
> > +
> > +# success, all done
> > +status=0
> > +exit
> > diff --git a/tests/xfs/999.out b/tests/xfs/999.out
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..88b69c4c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/999.out
> > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> > +QA output created by 999
> > +fsync: Input/output error
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25 13:00 [PATCH v2] tests/xfs: test COW writeback failure when overlapping non-shared blocks Brian Foster
2021-10-25 16:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-10-31 15:20   ` Eryu Guan
2021-11-03 16:10     ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-17 18:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-12-17 15:19   ` Brian Foster [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ybyqf6OPsFt/X73C@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.