From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:24:52 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YeFdeZsTWDt9WU8f@zn.tnic> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YeCDudla868Ipf++@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:55:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On IRC Andrew also noted that these EX_REG_* things should be __i386__ > only. Previosly when they lived as open-coded EX_DATA_REG() usage in > entry_32.S that was implied, but now ... I guess that then below. amluto, I'd love it if we (and by that I mean you :-)) could document the rules for GS on 32-bit so that it is clear what's going on there... entry_32.S is only hinting at what's going on, we have comments here and there but not all concentrated into a single location. Thx. --- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:15:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Remove GS from the pt_regs offsets and fixup regs GS is special on 32-bit and segment exceptions fixup through it won't work. Leave breadcrumbs for others not to walk into the same nasty. Fixes: 9cdbeec40968 ("x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> --- arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h | 5 +++-- arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h index 503622627400..0aa5f4d3234f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h @@ -20,11 +20,12 @@ #define EX_DATA_FLAG(flag) ((flag) << EX_DATA_FLAG_SHIFT) #define EX_DATA_IMM(imm) ((imm) << EX_DATA_IMM_SHIFT) -/* segment regs */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 +/* segment regs, valid only for 32-bit code, see pt_regoff */ #define EX_REG_DS EX_DATA_REG(8) #define EX_REG_ES EX_DATA_REG(9) #define EX_REG_FS EX_DATA_REG(10) -#define EX_REG_GS EX_DATA_REG(11) +#endif /* flags */ #define EX_FLAG_CLEAR_AX EX_DATA_FLAG(1) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c index b781d324211b..34001eee7482 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c @@ -432,7 +432,10 @@ static const int pt_regoff[] = { offsetof(struct pt_regs, ds), offsetof(struct pt_regs, es), offsetof(struct pt_regs, fs), - offsetof(struct pt_regs, gs), + /* + * Can't use that one - it is special - see entry_32.S + * offsetof(struct pt_regs, gs), + */ #endif }; -- 2.29.2 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:24:52 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YeFdeZsTWDt9WU8f@zn.tnic> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YeCDudla868Ipf++@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2454 bytes --] On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:55:37PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On IRC Andrew also noted that these EX_REG_* things should be __i386__ > only. Previosly when they lived as open-coded EX_DATA_REG() usage in > entry_32.S that was implied, but now ... I guess that then below. amluto, I'd love it if we (and by that I mean you :-)) could document the rules for GS on 32-bit so that it is clear what's going on there... entry_32.S is only hinting at what's going on, we have comments here and there but not all concentrated into a single location. Thx. --- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:15:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Remove GS from the pt_regs offsets and fixup regs GS is special on 32-bit and segment exceptions fixup through it won't work. Leave breadcrumbs for others not to walk into the same nasty. Fixes: 9cdbeec40968 ("x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> --- arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h | 5 +++-- arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h index 503622627400..0aa5f4d3234f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/extable_fixup_types.h @@ -20,11 +20,12 @@ #define EX_DATA_FLAG(flag) ((flag) << EX_DATA_FLAG_SHIFT) #define EX_DATA_IMM(imm) ((imm) << EX_DATA_IMM_SHIFT) -/* segment regs */ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 +/* segment regs, valid only for 32-bit code, see pt_regoff */ #define EX_REG_DS EX_DATA_REG(8) #define EX_REG_ES EX_DATA_REG(9) #define EX_REG_FS EX_DATA_REG(10) -#define EX_REG_GS EX_DATA_REG(11) +#endif /* flags */ #define EX_FLAG_CLEAR_AX EX_DATA_FLAG(1) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c index b781d324211b..34001eee7482 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c @@ -432,7 +432,10 @@ static const int pt_regoff[] = { offsetof(struct pt_regs, ds), offsetof(struct pt_regs, es), offsetof(struct pt_regs, fs), - offsetof(struct pt_regs, gs), + /* + * Can't use that one - it is special - see entry_32.S + * offsetof(struct pt_regs, gs), + */ #endif }; -- 2.29.2 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-14 11:24 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-06 8:35 [x86/entry_32] aa93e2ad74: BUG:soft_lockup-CPU##stuck_for#s![systemd-logind:#] kernel test robot 2022-01-06 8:35 ` kernel test robot 2022-01-11 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-11 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-12 1:28 ` Sean Christopherson 2022-01-12 1:28 ` Sean Christopherson 2022-01-12 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-12 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-12 16:14 ` Sean Christopherson 2022-01-12 16:14 ` Sean Christopherson 2022-01-12 10:55 ` [PATCH] x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-12 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-12 15:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2022-01-12 15:42 ` Borislav Petkov 2022-01-13 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski 2022-01-13 18:54 ` Andy Lutomirski 2022-01-13 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-13 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-01-14 11:24 ` Borislav Petkov [this message] 2022-01-14 11:24 ` Borislav Petkov 2022-01-14 23:48 ` Andy Lutomirski 2022-01-14 23:48 ` Andy Lutomirski 2022-01-15 8:13 ` Borislav Petkov 2022-01-15 8:13 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YeFdeZsTWDt9WU8f@zn.tnic \ --to=bp@alien8.de \ --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=seanjc@google.com \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.