All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] libperf: Add arm64 support to perf_mmap__read_self()
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 09:14:57 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yf+7wdTCYtx+2LVM@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfq19vtuARvlBKsz@krava>

Em Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 03:40:56PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Add the arm64 variants for read_perf_counter() and read_timestamp().
> > Unfortunately the counter number is encoded into the instruction, so the
> > code is a bit verbose to enumerate all possible counters.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > Arm64 kernel support landed in 5.17, but the corresponding libperf 
> > support didn't get picked up.
> > 
> > v9:
> >  - Rebase on v5.17-rc
> >  - Add Tested-by
> > v8:
> >  - Set attr.config1 to request user access on arm64
> > v7:
> >  - Move enabling of libperf user read test for arm64 to this patch
> > ---
> >  tools/lib/perf/mmap.c             | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c |  5 +-
> >  2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > index f7ee07cb5818..0d1634cedf44 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/mmap.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  #include <internal/lib.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/math64.h>
> > +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> >  #include "internal.h"
> >  
> >  void perf_mmap__init(struct perf_mmap *map, struct perf_mmap *prev,
> > @@ -294,6 +295,103 @@ static u64 read_timestamp(void)
> >  
> >  	return low | ((u64)high) << 32;
> >  }
> > +#elif defined(__aarch64__)
> > +#define read_sysreg(r) ({						\
> > +	u64 __val;							\
> > +	asm volatile("mrs %0, " __stringify(r) : "=r" (__val));		\
> > +	__val;								\
> > +})
> 
> if this works on arm I don't have problem, but aat some point
> we shuld add arch directory and move it there ;-)
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

 
> thanks,
> jirka
> 
> > +
> > +static u64 read_pmccntr(void)
> > +{
> > +	return read_sysreg(pmccntr_el0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define PMEVCNTR_READ(idx)					\
> > +	static u64 read_pmevcntr_##idx(void) {			\
> > +		return read_sysreg(pmevcntr##idx##_el0);	\
> > +	}
> > +
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(0);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(1);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(2);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(3);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(4);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(5);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(6);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(7);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(8);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(9);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(10);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(11);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(12);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(13);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(14);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(15);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(16);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(17);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(18);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(19);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(20);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(21);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(22);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(23);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(24);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(25);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(26);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(27);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(28);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(29);
> > +PMEVCNTR_READ(30);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Read a value direct from PMEVCNTR<idx>
> > + */
> > +static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter)
> > +{
> > +	static u64 (* const read_f[])(void) = {
> > +		read_pmevcntr_0,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_1,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_2,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_3,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_4,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_5,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_6,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_7,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_8,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_9,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_10,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_11,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_13,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_12,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_14,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_15,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_16,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_17,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_18,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_19,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_20,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_21,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_22,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_23,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_24,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_25,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_26,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_27,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_28,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_29,
> > +		read_pmevcntr_30,
> > +		read_pmccntr
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	if (counter < ARRAY_SIZE(read_f))
> > +		return (read_f[counter])();
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return read_sysreg(cntvct_el0); }
> > +
> >  #else
> >  static u64 read_perf_counter(unsigned int counter __maybe_unused) { return 0; }
> >  static u64 read_timestamp(void) { return 0; }
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > index 33ae9334861a..89be89afb24d 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
> > @@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ static int test_stat_user_read(int event)
> >  	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> >  		.type	= PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> >  		.config	= event,
> > +#ifdef __aarch64__
> > +		.config1 = 0x2,		/* Request user access */
> > +#endif
> >  	};
> >  	int err, i;
> >  
> > @@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ static int test_stat_user_read(int event)
> >  	pc = perf_evsel__mmap_base(evsel, 0, 0);
> >  	__T("failed to get mmapped address", pc);
> >  
> > -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> >  	__T("userspace counter access not supported", pc->cap_user_rdpmc);
> >  	__T("userspace counter access not enabled", pc->index);
> >  	__T("userspace counter width not set", pc->pmc_width >= 32);
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0
> > 

-- 

- Arnaldo

      reply	other threads:[~2022-02-06 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01 21:40 [PATCH v9] libperf: Add arm64 support to perf_mmap__read_self() Rob Herring
2022-02-01 23:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-02-02 10:33 ` John Garry
2022-02-02 16:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-02-06 12:14   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yf+7wdTCYtx+2LVM@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.