All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Cristiano Giuffrida" <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"amd-gfx list" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	"Linux Media Mailing List" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Arnd Bergman" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Linux PM" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	dma <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-tegra <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux F2FS Dev Mailing List"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Linux Crypto Mailing List" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 18:36:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEDAD0D9-56EE-4105-9107-72C2EAD940B0@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:28:15PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 1. Mar 2022, at 01:41, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> The goal of this is to get compiler warnings right? This would indeed be great.
> > 
> > Yes, so I don't mind having a one-time patch that has been gathered
> > using some automated checker tool, but I don't think that works from a
> > long-term maintenance perspective.
> > 
> > So if we have the basic rule being "don't use the loop iterator after
> > the loop has finished, because it can cause all kinds of subtle
> > issues", then in _addition_ to fixing the existing code paths that
> > have this issue, I really would want to (a) get a compiler warning for
> > future cases and (b) make it not actually _work_ for future cases.
> > 
> > Because otherwise it will just happen again.
> > 
> >> Changing the list_for_each_entry() macro first will break all of those cases
> >> (e.g. the ones using 'list_entry_is_head()).
> > 
> > So I have no problems with breaking cases that we basically already
> > have a patch for due to  your automated tool. There were certainly
> > more than a handful, but it didn't look _too_ bad to just make the
> > rule be "don't use the iterator after the loop".
> > 
> > Of course, that's just based on that patch of yours. Maybe there are a
> > ton of other cases that your patch didn't change, because they didn't
> > match your trigger case, so I may just be overly optimistic here.
> 
> Based on the coccinelle script there are ~480 cases that need fixing
> in total. I'll now finish all of them and then split them by
> submodules as Greg suggested and repost a patch set per submodule.
> Sounds good?

Sounds good to me!

If you need help carving these up and maintaining them over time as
different subsystem maintainers accept/ignore them, just let me know.
Doing large patchsets like this can be tough without a lot of
experience.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-01 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 596+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 11:08 [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers: usb: remove " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:24   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:24     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 12:03     ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:03       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 13:18       ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:18         ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:18         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:18         ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:18         ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:18         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 18:20     ` [f2fs-dev] " Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` [Nouveau] " Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` [Intel-gfx] " Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` Joe Perches
2022-02-28 18:20       ` Joe Perches
2022-03-01  5:52       ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  5:52         ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 2/6] treewide: remove using list iterator after loop body as a ptr Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:20   ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` [Nouveau] " Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:20     ` [f2fs-dev] " Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:06     ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 12:06       ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:37       ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` [Nouveau] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` [f2fs-dev] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:37         ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 12:19   ` Christian König
2022-02-28 12:19     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Christian =?unknown-8bit?q?K=C3=B6nig?=
2022-02-28 12:19     ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2022-02-28 12:19     ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian König via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-02-28 12:19     ` Christian König
2022-02-28 12:19     ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-02-28 12:19     ` Christian König
2022-02-28 19:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 19:56       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 19:56       ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 19:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 19:56       ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 19:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10           ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10           ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:14             ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:53             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` [Intel-gfx] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` [Nouveau] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` [f2fs-dev] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:53               ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-28 20:16           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:16             ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 20:27             ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` [Nouveau] " Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` [f2fs-dev] " Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` [Intel-gfx] " Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:27               ` Johannes Berg
2022-02-28 20:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:41                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 20:37               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 23:26               ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-28 23:26                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01  0:45                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:45                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:57                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:14                   ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` [Nouveau] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` [f2fs-dev] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:14                     ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:47                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 18:47                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:01                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` [Nouveau] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01 19:01                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-01  3:03             ` David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` David Laight
2022-03-01  3:03               ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-02-28 21:47           ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:47             ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01  0:41             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:41               ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  6:32               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` [Nouveau] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01  6:32                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-01 11:28               ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 11:28                 ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:36                 ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` [Nouveau] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:36                   ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:40                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:40                     ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-01 17:58                     ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` [Nouveau] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` Greg KH
2022-03-01 17:58                       ` [f2fs-dev] " Greg KH
2022-03-01 18:21                 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` [Nouveau] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` Kees Cook
2022-03-01 18:21                   ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02  9:31               ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02  9:31                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-02 14:04                 ` David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` David Laight
2022-03-02 14:04                   ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-03  2:27                   ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  2:27                     ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  4:58                     ` David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` David Laight
2022-03-03  4:58                       ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-03  7:26                       ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:26                         ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  9:30                         ` David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` David Laight
2022-03-03  9:30                           ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-03 12:37                           ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:37                             ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03 12:18                         ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` [Nouveau] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` [f2fs-dev] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Thompson
2022-03-03 12:18                           ` Daniel Thompson
2022-03-04  6:59                           ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-04  6:59                             ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  7:32                       ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  7:32                         ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-03  8:30                         ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:30                           ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                           ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` [Nouveau] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` Xiaomeng Tong
2022-03-03  8:38                             ` [f2fs-dev] " Xiaomeng Tong
2022-02-28 20:07       ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:07         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Christian =?unknown-8bit?q?K=C3=B6nig?=
2022-02-28 20:07         ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2022-02-28 20:07         ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian König via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-02-28 20:07         ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-02-28 20:07         ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:07         ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:42         ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` [Nouveau] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` [f2fs-dev] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` [Intel-gfx] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:42           ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 20:56           ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:56             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Christian =?unknown-8bit?q?K=C3=B6nig?=
2022-02-28 20:56             ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2022-02-28 20:56             ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian König via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-02-28 20:56             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-02-28 20:56             ` Christian König
2022-02-28 20:56             ` Christian König
2022-02-28 21:13             ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` [Nouveau] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` [Intel-gfx] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 21:13               ` [f2fs-dev] " James Bottomley
2022-03-01  7:03               ` Christian König
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Christian =?unknown-8bit?q?K=C3=B6nig?=
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` [Nouveau] " Christian König
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` Christian König
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` Christian König
2022-03-01  7:03                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christian König via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-02-28 22:05             ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 22:05               ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 21:18           ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` [Nouveau] " Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:18             ` [f2fs-dev] " Jeffrey Walton
2022-02-28 21:59           ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` [Intel-gfx] " Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` [Nouveau] " Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 21:59             ` [f2fs-dev] " Mike Rapoport
2022-02-28 22:28             ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` [Nouveau] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` [Intel-gfx] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:28               ` [f2fs-dev] " James Bottomley
2022-02-28 22:50               ` Barnabás Pőcze
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Barnab=C3=A1s_P=C5=91cze?=
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Barnabás Pőcze
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` [Nouveau] " Barnabás Pőcze
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2022-02-28 22:50                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Barnabás Pőcze via Linux-f2fs-devel
2022-03-01  0:30               ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` [Nouveau] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:30                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-01  0:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01  0:54                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:06                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 19:42                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 22:58                 ` David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-01 22:58                   ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:03                   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:03                     ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:19                     ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:19                       ` David Laight
2022-03-01 23:55                       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 23:55                         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02  9:29                         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` [Nouveau] " Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` [f2fs-dev] " Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02  9:29                           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2022-03-02 20:07                           ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` [Nouveau] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:07                             ` [f2fs-dev] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:18                             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:18                               ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 20:59                               ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` [Nouveau] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` Kees Cook
2022-03-02 20:59                                 ` [f2fs-dev] " Kees Cook
2022-03-03  8:37                             ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03  8:37                               ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                           ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-03 10:56                             ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01  2:15       ` David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` David Laight
2022-03-01  2:15         ` David Laight
2022-02-28 13:13   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:13     ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:13     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:13     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:13     ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 3/6] treewide: fix incorrect use to determine if list is empty Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:38   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:38     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 4/6] drivers: remove unnecessary use of list iterator variable Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] treewide: remove dereference of list iterator after loop body Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08 ` [PATCH 6/6] treewide: remove check of list iterator against head past the " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Nouveau] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:08   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jakob Koschel
2022-02-28 11:22   ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` [Nouveau] " Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 11:22     ` Dominique Martinet
2022-02-28 13:12   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:12     ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:12     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:12     ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:12     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-02-28 13:12     ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-01 20:36   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` [Nouveau] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` [f2fs-dev] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-01 20:36     ` [Intel-gfx] " Linus Torvalds
2022-03-02 17:14   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-02 17:14     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-02 17:14     ` [Nouveau] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-02 17:14     ` [f2fs-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-02 17:14     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-02 17:14     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-03-01  0:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body (rev2) Patchwork
2022-03-01  2:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body (rev3) Patchwork
2022-03-01 22:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body (rev4) Patchwork
2022-03-03 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body (rev5) Patchwork
2022-03-03 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-03-03 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-03-07 15:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] Remove usage of list iterator past the loop body Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` [Nouveau] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` [f2fs-dev] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:00   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-03-07 15:26   ` David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` [Nouveau] " David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` [Intel-gfx] " David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` David Laight
2022-03-07 15:26     ` [f2fs-dev] " David Laight
2022-03-07 19:15     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yh5ZmwiH5AxtQ69K@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.