All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: clang: Strip out -mno-global-merge from USER_CFLAGS
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:26:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiEISsoS/XrbEtbm@thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203030947.E2FA3D9@keescook>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:30:47AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:06:42PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > > The things built with USER_CFLAGS don't seem to recognise it as a
> > > compiler option, and print a warning:
> > > clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mno-global-merge' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 744814d2fa ("um: Allow builds with Clang")
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > This warning shows up after merging:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220227184517.504931-6-keescook@chromium.org/
> > > 
> > > I'm not 100% sure why this is necessary, but it does seem to work. All
> > > the attempts to get rid of -mno-global-merge entirely have been met with
> > > skepticism, but I'm guessing that it's not a problem for just the UML
> > > "user" files, as they shouldn't(?) interact too much with modules.
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch! I think it is correct, as this flag only works
> > for AArch64 and ARM, as it is only used in Clang::AddAArch64TargetArgs()
> > and Clang::AddARMTargetArgs() in clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp,
> > which are obviously never called with UML. I am not sure why we do not
> > see warning during regular kernel builds, maybe something about how UML
> > objects are compiled exposes this?
> 
> Yeah, I got really turned around when I tried to find this last week.
> 
> > 
> > Regardless, I would definitely like to clean up this instance of the
> > warning because I would like to make this warning a hard error so that
> > we do not get cryptic cc-option failures:
> > 
> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1587
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > 
> > One small comment below.
> > 
> > >  arch/um/Makefile | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile b/arch/um/Makefile
> > > index f2fe63bfd819..320b09cd513c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/um/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/um/Makefile
> > > @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ USER_CFLAGS = $(patsubst $(KERNEL_DEFINES),,$(patsubst -I%,,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS))) \
> > >  		-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -idirafter $(srctree)/include \
> > >  		-idirafter $(objtree)/include -D__KERNEL__ -D__UM_HOST__
> > >  
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> > 
> > Is this ifdef needed?
> > 
> > > +USER_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -mno-global-merge,,$(USER_CFLAGS))
> > > +endif
> 
> How does -mno-global-merge get KBUILD_CFLAGS in the first place? If it's
> arm/arm64 only, shouldn't that get relocated to those architectures?
> 
> *time travel* found it:
> 
> 61163efae020 ("kbuild: LLVMLinux: Add Kbuild support for building kernel with Clang")
> 
> So I think this may have been universally true long ago, and now only
> arm/arm64 need it?

I don't think so. -mno-global-merge was introduced in [1], which only
added the option handling in Clang::AddARMTargetArgs(). In fact, when
-mglobal-merge was added, there was a test added that checked that
-mglobal-merge/-mno-global-merge had no impact with an x86_64 triple [2].

Perhaps at the time that 61163efae020 was written, they were testing
against either ARCH=arm or ARCH=arm64, which would have shown the
problem that they mentioned? There is no context in the commit message
so *shrug*.

Regardless, I think your patch is equally viable, perhaps even better,
as I am sure this is not the only area where this warning might show up.

[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba3df1d3ca8569ff8f6e289594c53926e71e519a
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/256a869d312b37ed7b5d131329050fcdadb11148

Cheers,
Nathan

> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 2f6fbba88a0e..fbc42c3c389e 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -852,10 +852,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
>  KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -Qunused-arguments
>  # The kernel builds with '-std=gnu89' so use of GNU extensions is acceptable.
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-gnu
> -# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> -# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> -# See modpost pattern 2
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-global-merge
>  else
>  
>  # gcc inanely warns about local variables called 'main'
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
> index a2391b8de5a5..dcab28c44c26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ CHECKFLAGS	+= -D__ARMEL__
>  KBUILD_LDFLAGS	+= -EL
>  endif
>  
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> +# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> +# See modpost pattern 2
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mno-global-merge
> +endif
> +
>  #
>  # The Scalar Replacement of Aggregates (SRA) optimization pass in GCC 4.9 and
>  # later may result in code being generated that handles signed short and signed
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index 2f1de88651e6..2d20fb2ea664 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_BROKEN_GAS_INST),y)
>  $(warning Detected assembler with broken .inst; disassembly will be unreliable)
>  endif
>  
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> +# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> +# See modpost pattern 2
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mno-global-merge
> +endif
> +
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mgeneral-regs-only	\
>  		   $(compat_vdso) $(cc_has_k_constraint)
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning, psabi)
> 
> > > +
> > >  #This will adjust *FLAGS accordingly to the platform.
> > >  include $(srctree)/$(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-os-$(OS)
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: clang: Strip out -mno-global-merge from USER_CFLAGS
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 11:26:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiEISsoS/XrbEtbm@thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203030947.E2FA3D9@keescook>

On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:04:28AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 10:30:47AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Hi David,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 05:06:42PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > > The things built with USER_CFLAGS don't seem to recognise it as a
> > > compiler option, and print a warning:
> > > clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-mno-global-merge' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 744814d2fa ("um: Allow builds with Clang")
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > This warning shows up after merging:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220227184517.504931-6-keescook@chromium.org/
> > > 
> > > I'm not 100% sure why this is necessary, but it does seem to work. All
> > > the attempts to get rid of -mno-global-merge entirely have been met with
> > > skepticism, but I'm guessing that it's not a problem for just the UML
> > > "user" files, as they shouldn't(?) interact too much with modules.
> > 
> > Thank you for the patch! I think it is correct, as this flag only works
> > for AArch64 and ARM, as it is only used in Clang::AddAArch64TargetArgs()
> > and Clang::AddARMTargetArgs() in clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp,
> > which are obviously never called with UML. I am not sure why we do not
> > see warning during regular kernel builds, maybe something about how UML
> > objects are compiled exposes this?
> 
> Yeah, I got really turned around when I tried to find this last week.
> 
> > 
> > Regardless, I would definitely like to clean up this instance of the
> > warning because I would like to make this warning a hard error so that
> > we do not get cryptic cc-option failures:
> > 
> > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1587
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > 
> > One small comment below.
> > 
> > >  arch/um/Makefile | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/um/Makefile b/arch/um/Makefile
> > > index f2fe63bfd819..320b09cd513c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/um/Makefile
> > > +++ b/arch/um/Makefile
> > > @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ USER_CFLAGS = $(patsubst $(KERNEL_DEFINES),,$(patsubst -I%,,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS))) \
> > >  		-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -idirafter $(srctree)/include \
> > >  		-idirafter $(objtree)/include -D__KERNEL__ -D__UM_HOST__
> > >  
> > > +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> > 
> > Is this ifdef needed?
> > 
> > > +USER_CFLAGS := $(patsubst -mno-global-merge,,$(USER_CFLAGS))
> > > +endif
> 
> How does -mno-global-merge get KBUILD_CFLAGS in the first place? If it's
> arm/arm64 only, shouldn't that get relocated to those architectures?
> 
> *time travel* found it:
> 
> 61163efae020 ("kbuild: LLVMLinux: Add Kbuild support for building kernel with Clang")
> 
> So I think this may have been universally true long ago, and now only
> arm/arm64 need it?

I don't think so. -mno-global-merge was introduced in [1], which only
added the option handling in Clang::AddARMTargetArgs(). In fact, when
-mglobal-merge was added, there was a test added that checked that
-mglobal-merge/-mno-global-merge had no impact with an x86_64 triple [2].

Perhaps at the time that 61163efae020 was written, they were testing
against either ARCH=arm or ARCH=arm64, which would have shown the
problem that they mentioned? There is no context in the commit message
so *shrug*.

Regardless, I think your patch is equally viable, perhaps even better,
as I am sure this is not the only area where this warning might show up.

[1]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ba3df1d3ca8569ff8f6e289594c53926e71e519a
[2]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/256a869d312b37ed7b5d131329050fcdadb11148

Cheers,
Nathan

> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 2f6fbba88a0e..fbc42c3c389e 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -852,10 +852,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
>  KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -Qunused-arguments
>  # The kernel builds with '-std=gnu89' so use of GNU extensions is acceptable.
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-gnu
> -# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> -# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> -# See modpost pattern 2
> -KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mno-global-merge
>  else
>  
>  # gcc inanely warns about local variables called 'main'
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
> index a2391b8de5a5..dcab28c44c26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ CHECKFLAGS	+= -D__ARMEL__
>  KBUILD_LDFLAGS	+= -EL
>  endif
>  
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> +# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> +# See modpost pattern 2
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mno-global-merge
> +endif
> +
>  #
>  # The Scalar Replacement of Aggregates (SRA) optimization pass in GCC 4.9 and
>  # later may result in code being generated that handles signed short and signed
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> index 2f1de88651e6..2d20fb2ea664 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> @@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_BROKEN_GAS_INST),y)
>  $(warning Detected assembler with broken .inst; disassembly will be unreliable)
>  endif
>  
> +ifdef CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG
> +# CLANG uses a _MergedGlobals as optimization, but this breaks modpost, as the
> +# source of a reference will be _MergedGlobals and not on of the whitelisted names.
> +# See modpost pattern 2
> +KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mno-global-merge
> +endif
> +
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -mgeneral-regs-only	\
>  		   $(compat_vdso) $(cc_has_k_constraint)
>  KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= $(call cc-disable-warning, psabi)
> 
> > > +
> > >  #This will adjust *FLAGS accordingly to the platform.
> > >  include $(srctree)/$(ARCH_DIR)/Makefile-os-$(OS)
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.35.1.616.g0bdcbb4464-goog
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook

_______________________________________________
linux-um mailing list
linux-um@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-03 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-03  9:06 [PATCH] um: clang: Strip out -mno-global-merge from USER_CFLAGS David Gow
2022-03-03  9:06 ` David Gow
2022-03-03 17:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-03-03 17:30   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-03-03 18:04   ` Kees Cook
2022-03-03 18:26     ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-03-03 18:26       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-03-03 18:39       ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-03 18:39         ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-04 11:42         ` Sedat Dilek
2022-03-04 11:42           ` Sedat Dilek
2022-03-04  6:51   ` David Gow
2022-03-04  6:51     ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YiEISsoS/XrbEtbm@thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.