Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use g_new() & friends where that makes obvious sense

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Markus Armbruster (armbru@redhat.com) wrote:
> g_new(T, n) is neater than g_malloc(sizeof(T) * n).  It's also safer,
> for two reasons.  One, it catches multiplication overflowing size_t.
> Two, it returns T * rather than void *, which lets the compiler catch
> more type errors.
> 
> This commit only touches allocations with size arguments of the form
> sizeof(T).
> 
> Patch created mechanically with:
> 
>     $ spatch --in-place --sp-file scripts/coccinelle/use-g_new-etc.cocci \
> 	     --macro-file scripts/cocci-macro-file.h FILES...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Just a small patch then...

> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> index d65e744af9..aace12a787 100644
> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static struct DirtyRateInfo *query_dirty_rate_info(void)
>  {
>      int i;
>      int64_t dirty_rate = DirtyStat.dirty_rate;
> -    struct DirtyRateInfo *info = g_malloc0(sizeof(DirtyRateInfo));
> +    struct DirtyRateInfo *info = g_new0(DirtyRateInfo, 1);
>      DirtyRateVcpuList *head = NULL, **tail = &head;
>  
>      info->status = CalculatingState;
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static struct DirtyRateInfo *query_dirty_rate_info(void)
>              info->sample_pages = 0;
>              info->has_vcpu_dirty_rate = true;
>              for (i = 0; i < DirtyStat.dirty_ring.nvcpu; i++) {
> -                DirtyRateVcpu *rate = g_malloc0(sizeof(DirtyRateVcpu));
> +                DirtyRateVcpu *rate = g_new0(DirtyRateVcpu, 1);
>                  rate->id = DirtyStat.dirty_ring.rates[i].id;
>                  rate->dirty_rate = DirtyStat.dirty_ring.rates[i].dirty_rate;
>                  QAPI_LIST_APPEND(tail, rate);
> diff --git a/migration/multifd-zlib.c b/migration/multifd-zlib.c
> index aba1c88a0c..3a7ae44485 100644
> --- a/migration/multifd-zlib.c
> +++ b/migration/multifd-zlib.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ struct zlib_data {
>   */
>  static int zlib_send_setup(MultiFDSendParams *p, Error **errp)
>  {
> -    struct zlib_data *z = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct zlib_data));
> +    struct zlib_data *z = g_new0(struct zlib_data, 1);
>      z_stream *zs = &z->zs;
>  
>      zs->zalloc = Z_NULL;
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int zlib_send_prepare(MultiFDSendParams *p, Error **errp)
>   */
>  static int zlib_recv_setup(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp)
>  {
> -    struct zlib_data *z = g_malloc0(sizeof(struct zlib_data));
> +    struct zlib_data *z = g_new0(struct zlib_data, 1);
>      z_stream *zs = &z->zs;
>  
>      p->data = z;
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 170e522a1f..3532f64ecb 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -2059,7 +2059,7 @@ int ram_save_queue_pages(const char *rbname, ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t len)
>      }
>  
>      struct RAMSrcPageRequest *new_entry =
> -        g_malloc0(sizeof(struct RAMSrcPageRequest));
> +        g_new0(struct RAMSrcPageRequest, 1);
>      new_entry->rb = ramblock;
>      new_entry->offset = start;
>      new_entry->len = len;

For migration:
Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK