From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Hegde Vasant <Vasant.Hegde@amd.com>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix issues with untrusted devices and AMD IOMMU Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:54:37 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YksizUJzRgEEdHLJ@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220404164707.1128-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 11:47:05AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > The bounce buffers were originally set up, but torn down during > the boot process. > * This happens because as part of IOMMU initialization > `amd_iommu_init_dma_ops` gets called and resets the global swiotlb to 0. > * When late_init gets called `pci_swiotlb_late_init` `swiotlb_exit` is > called and the buffers are torn down. I think the proper thing is to do this: diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c index a1ada7bff44e6..079694f894b85 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c @@ -1838,17 +1838,10 @@ void amd_iommu_domain_update(struct protection_domain *domain) amd_iommu_domain_flush_complete(domain); } -static void __init amd_iommu_init_dma_ops(void) -{ - swiotlb = (iommu_default_passthrough() || sme_me_mask) ? 1 : 0; -} - int __init amd_iommu_init_api(void) { int err; - amd_iommu_init_dma_ops(); - err = bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &amd_iommu_ops); if (err) return err; _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Suthikulpanit Suravee <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>, Hegde Vasant <Vasant.Hegde@amd.com>, open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix issues with untrusted devices and AMD IOMMU Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:54:37 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YksizUJzRgEEdHLJ@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220404164707.1128-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 11:47:05AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > The bounce buffers were originally set up, but torn down during > the boot process. > * This happens because as part of IOMMU initialization > `amd_iommu_init_dma_ops` gets called and resets the global swiotlb to 0. > * When late_init gets called `pci_swiotlb_late_init` `swiotlb_exit` is > called and the buffers are torn down. I think the proper thing is to do this: diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c index a1ada7bff44e6..079694f894b85 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c @@ -1838,17 +1838,10 @@ void amd_iommu_domain_update(struct protection_domain *domain) amd_iommu_domain_flush_complete(domain); } -static void __init amd_iommu_init_dma_ops(void) -{ - swiotlb = (iommu_default_passthrough() || sme_me_mask) ? 1 : 0; -} - int __init amd_iommu_init_api(void) { int err; - amd_iommu_init_dma_ops(); - err = bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &amd_iommu_ops); if (err) return err;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 16:54 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-04-04 16:47 [PATCH 0/2] Fix issues with untrusted devices and AMD IOMMU Mario Limonciello via iommu 2022-04-04 16:47 ` Mario Limonciello 2022-04-04 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] swiotlb: Check that slabs have been allocated when requested Mario Limonciello via iommu 2022-04-04 16:47 ` Mario Limonciello 2022-04-04 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu: Don't use swiotlb unless it's active Mario Limonciello via iommu 2022-04-04 16:47 ` Mario Limonciello 2022-04-04 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message] 2022-04-04 16:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix issues with untrusted devices and AMD IOMMU Christoph Hellwig 2022-04-04 17:05 ` Limonciello, Mario via iommu 2022-04-04 17:05 ` Limonciello, Mario 2022-04-04 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig 2022-04-04 17:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YksizUJzRgEEdHLJ@infradead.org \ --to=hch@infradead.org \ --cc=Vasant.Hegde@amd.com \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \ --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \ --cc=will@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.