From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add R329 and D1 compatibles
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:39:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmYX1c6iPNb8NtTe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414002349.24332-1-samuel@sholland.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 07:23:46PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The R329 and D1 SoCs each contain an LRADC with a programming interface
> compatible to earlier LRADCs. However, the LRADC now has its own clock
> gate and reset line, instead of being always active.
>
> To support this, add clock/reset properties to the binding, and require
> them for the variant in the new SoCs.
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Applied, thank you.
--
Dmitry
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add R329 and D1 compatibles
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:39:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmYX1c6iPNb8NtTe@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414002349.24332-1-samuel@sholland.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 07:23:46PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The R329 and D1 SoCs each contain an LRADC with a programming interface
> compatible to earlier LRADCs. However, the LRADC now has its own clock
> gate and reset line, instead of being always active.
>
> To support this, add clock/reset properties to the binding, and require
> them for the variant in the new SoCs.
>
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Applied, thank you.
--
Dmitry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-25 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-14 0:23 [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add R329 and D1 compatibles Samuel Holland
2022-04-14 0:23 ` Samuel Holland
2022-04-14 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add optional clock/reset support Samuel Holland
2022-04-14 0:23 ` Samuel Holland
2022-04-15 18:21 ` Jernej Škrabec
2022-04-15 18:21 ` Jernej Škrabec
2022-04-25 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-04-25 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-04-14 0:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add support for R329 and D1 Samuel Holland
2022-04-14 0:23 ` Samuel Holland
2022-04-15 18:21 ` Jernej Škrabec
2022-04-15 18:21 ` Jernej Škrabec
2022-04-25 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-04-25 3:42 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2022-04-25 3:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2022-04-25 3:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: input: sun4i-lradc-keys: Add R329 and D1 compatibles Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmYX1c6iPNb8NtTe@google.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.