All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/13] drm/edid: add HF-EEODB support to EDID read and allocation
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 20:13:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YppBTAFXSNgaoymG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7451127fb889f9d2ed723a6d83e033d6a5196354.1653381821.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:39:33PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> HDMI 2.1 section 10.3.6 defines an HDMI Forum EDID Extension Override
> Data Block, which may contain a different extension count than the base
> block claims. Add support for reading more EDID data if available. The
> extra blocks aren't parsed yet, though.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 5e0a91da565e..ba0c880dc133 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -1581,6 +1581,15 @@ static bool version_greater(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid,
>  		(edid->version == version && edid->revision > revision);
>  }
>  
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid);
> +
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
> +{
> +	int eeodb = edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(edid);
> +
> +	return eeodb ? eeodb + 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int edid_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
>  {
>  	return edid->extensions;
> @@ -2026,6 +2035,11 @@ static struct edid *edid_filter_invalid_blocks(struct edid *edid,
>  	struct edid *new;
>  	int i, valid_blocks = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: If the EDID uses HF-EEODB, but has invalid blocks, we'll revert
> +	 * back to regular extension count here. We don't want to start
> +	 * modifying the HF-EEODB extension too.
> +	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < edid_block_count(edid); i++) {
>  		const void *src_block = edid_block_data(edid, i);
>  
> @@ -2235,7 +2249,7 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				     size_t *size)
>  {
>  	enum edid_block_status status;
> -	int i, invalid_blocks = 0;
> +	int i, num_blocks, invalid_blocks = 0;
>  	struct edid *edid, *new;
>  	size_t alloc_size = EDID_LENGTH;
>  
> @@ -2277,7 +2291,8 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  		goto fail;
>  	edid = new;
>  
> -	for (i = 1; i < edid_block_count(edid); i++) {
> +	num_blocks = edid_block_count(edid);
> +	for (i = 1; i < num_blocks; i++) {
>  		void *block = (void *)edid_block_data(edid, i);
>  
>  		status = edid_block_read(block, i, read_block, context);
> @@ -2288,11 +2303,31 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  			if (status == EDID_BLOCK_READ_FAIL)
>  				goto fail;
>  			invalid_blocks++;
> +		} else if (i == 1) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If the first EDID extension is a CTA extension, and
> +			 * the first Data Block is HF-EEODB, override the
> +			 * extension block count.
> +			 *
> +			 * Note: HF-EEODB could specify a smaller extension
> +			 * count too, but we can't risk allocating a smaller
> +			 * amount.
> +			 */
> +			int eeodb = edid_hfeeodb_block_count(edid);
> +
> +			if (eeodb > num_blocks) {
> +				num_blocks = eeodb;
> +				alloc_size = edid_size_by_blocks(num_blocks);
> +				new = krealloc(edid, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +				if (!new)
> +					goto fail;
> +				edid = new;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (invalid_blocks) {
> -		connector_bad_edid(connector, edid, edid_block_count(edid));
> +		connector_bad_edid(connector, edid, num_blocks);
>  
>  		edid = edid_filter_invalid_blocks(edid, &alloc_size);
>  	}
> @@ -3825,6 +3860,7 @@ static int add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_HDR_STATIC_METADATA	6
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_420_VIDEO_DATA	14
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_420_VIDEO_CAP_MAP	15
> +#define CTA_EXT_DB_HF_EEODB		0x78
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_HF_SCDB		0x79
>  
>  #define EDID_BASIC_AUDIO	(1 << 6)
> @@ -4868,6 +4904,12 @@ static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_vsdb(const struct cea_db *db)
>  		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 7;
>  }
>  
> +static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_eeodb(const void *db)
> +{
> +	return cea_db_is_extended_tag(db, CTA_EXT_DB_HF_EEODB) &&
> +		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 2;
> +}
> +
>  static bool cea_db_is_microsoft_vsdb(const struct cea_db *db)
>  {
>  	return cea_db_is_vendor(db, MICROSOFT_IEEE_OUI) &&
> @@ -4902,6 +4944,39 @@ static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_hdr_metadata_block(const struct cea_db *db)
>  		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 3;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Get the HF-EEODB override extension block count from EDID.
> + *
> + * The passed in EDID may be partially read, as long as it has at least two
> + * blocks (base block and one extension block) if EDID extension count is > 0.
> + *
> + * References:
> + * - HDMI 2.1 section 10.3.6 HDMI Forum EDID Extension Override Data Block
> + */
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
> +{
> +	const u8 *cta;
> +
> +	/* No extensions according to base block, no HF-EEODB. */
> +	if (!edid_extension_block_count(edid))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* HF-EEODB is always in the first EDID extension block only */
> +	cta = edid_extension_block_data(edid, 0);
> +	if (edid_block_tag(cta) != CEA_EXT || cea_revision(cta) < 3)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Sinks that include the HF-EEODB in their E-EDID shall include one and
> +	 * only one instance of the HF-EEODB in the E-EDID, occupying bytes 4
> +	 * through 6 of Block 1 of the E-EDID.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_eeodb(&cta[4]))
> +		return 0;

Still not a big fan of these hardcoded things. Not sure if there's any
easy way to just use the normal iterators at this point when we don't
really know the full composition of the EDID yet. If not then I guess
we'll have to use some hardcoded stuff. What we definitely seem to be
missing here are size checks, for both the whoe data block collection,
and the specific data block payload.

> +
> +	return cta[4 + 2];
> +}
> +
>  static void drm_parse_y420cmdb_bitmap(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				      const u8 *db)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 11/13] drm/edid: add HF-EEODB support to EDID read and allocation
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 20:13:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YppBTAFXSNgaoymG@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7451127fb889f9d2ed723a6d83e033d6a5196354.1653381821.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 01:39:33PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> HDMI 2.1 section 10.3.6 defines an HDMI Forum EDID Extension Override
> Data Block, which may contain a different extension count than the base
> block claims. Add support for reading more EDID data if available. The
> extra blocks aren't parsed yet, though.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 5e0a91da565e..ba0c880dc133 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -1581,6 +1581,15 @@ static bool version_greater(const struct drm_edid *drm_edid,
>  		(edid->version == version && edid->revision > revision);
>  }
>  
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid);
> +
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
> +{
> +	int eeodb = edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(edid);
> +
> +	return eeodb ? eeodb + 1 : 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int edid_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
>  {
>  	return edid->extensions;
> @@ -2026,6 +2035,11 @@ static struct edid *edid_filter_invalid_blocks(struct edid *edid,
>  	struct edid *new;
>  	int i, valid_blocks = 0;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Note: If the EDID uses HF-EEODB, but has invalid blocks, we'll revert
> +	 * back to regular extension count here. We don't want to start
> +	 * modifying the HF-EEODB extension too.
> +	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < edid_block_count(edid); i++) {
>  		const void *src_block = edid_block_data(edid, i);
>  
> @@ -2235,7 +2249,7 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				     size_t *size)
>  {
>  	enum edid_block_status status;
> -	int i, invalid_blocks = 0;
> +	int i, num_blocks, invalid_blocks = 0;
>  	struct edid *edid, *new;
>  	size_t alloc_size = EDID_LENGTH;
>  
> @@ -2277,7 +2291,8 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  		goto fail;
>  	edid = new;
>  
> -	for (i = 1; i < edid_block_count(edid); i++) {
> +	num_blocks = edid_block_count(edid);
> +	for (i = 1; i < num_blocks; i++) {
>  		void *block = (void *)edid_block_data(edid, i);
>  
>  		status = edid_block_read(block, i, read_block, context);
> @@ -2288,11 +2303,31 @@ static struct edid *_drm_do_get_edid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  			if (status == EDID_BLOCK_READ_FAIL)
>  				goto fail;
>  			invalid_blocks++;
> +		} else if (i == 1) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If the first EDID extension is a CTA extension, and
> +			 * the first Data Block is HF-EEODB, override the
> +			 * extension block count.
> +			 *
> +			 * Note: HF-EEODB could specify a smaller extension
> +			 * count too, but we can't risk allocating a smaller
> +			 * amount.
> +			 */
> +			int eeodb = edid_hfeeodb_block_count(edid);
> +
> +			if (eeodb > num_blocks) {
> +				num_blocks = eeodb;
> +				alloc_size = edid_size_by_blocks(num_blocks);
> +				new = krealloc(edid, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +				if (!new)
> +					goto fail;
> +				edid = new;
> +			}
>  		}
>  	}
>  
>  	if (invalid_blocks) {
> -		connector_bad_edid(connector, edid, edid_block_count(edid));
> +		connector_bad_edid(connector, edid, num_blocks);
>  
>  		edid = edid_filter_invalid_blocks(edid, &alloc_size);
>  	}
> @@ -3825,6 +3860,7 @@ static int add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_HDR_STATIC_METADATA	6
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_420_VIDEO_DATA	14
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_420_VIDEO_CAP_MAP	15
> +#define CTA_EXT_DB_HF_EEODB		0x78
>  #define CTA_EXT_DB_HF_SCDB		0x79
>  
>  #define EDID_BASIC_AUDIO	(1 << 6)
> @@ -4868,6 +4904,12 @@ static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_vsdb(const struct cea_db *db)
>  		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 7;
>  }
>  
> +static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_eeodb(const void *db)
> +{
> +	return cea_db_is_extended_tag(db, CTA_EXT_DB_HF_EEODB) &&
> +		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 2;
> +}
> +
>  static bool cea_db_is_microsoft_vsdb(const struct cea_db *db)
>  {
>  	return cea_db_is_vendor(db, MICROSOFT_IEEE_OUI) &&
> @@ -4902,6 +4944,39 @@ static bool cea_db_is_hdmi_hdr_metadata_block(const struct cea_db *db)
>  		cea_db_payload_len(db) >= 3;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Get the HF-EEODB override extension block count from EDID.
> + *
> + * The passed in EDID may be partially read, as long as it has at least two
> + * blocks (base block and one extension block) if EDID extension count is > 0.
> + *
> + * References:
> + * - HDMI 2.1 section 10.3.6 HDMI Forum EDID Extension Override Data Block
> + */
> +static int edid_hfeeodb_extension_block_count(const struct edid *edid)
> +{
> +	const u8 *cta;
> +
> +	/* No extensions according to base block, no HF-EEODB. */
> +	if (!edid_extension_block_count(edid))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* HF-EEODB is always in the first EDID extension block only */
> +	cta = edid_extension_block_data(edid, 0);
> +	if (edid_block_tag(cta) != CEA_EXT || cea_revision(cta) < 3)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Sinks that include the HF-EEODB in their E-EDID shall include one and
> +	 * only one instance of the HF-EEODB in the E-EDID, occupying bytes 4
> +	 * through 6 of Block 1 of the E-EDID.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cea_db_is_hdmi_forum_eeodb(&cta[4]))
> +		return 0;

Still not a big fan of these hardcoded things. Not sure if there's any
easy way to just use the normal iterators at this point when we don't
really know the full composition of the EDID yet. If not then I guess
we'll have to use some hardcoded stuff. What we definitely seem to be
missing here are size checks, for both the whoe data block collection,
and the specific data block payload.

> +
> +	return cta[4 + 2];
> +}
> +
>  static void drm_parse_y420cmdb_bitmap(struct drm_connector *connector,
>  				      const u8 *db)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-03 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-24 10:39 [Nouveau] [PATCH v1 00/13] drm/edid: expand on struct drm_edid usage Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] drm/edid: add block count and data helper functions for drm_edid Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 13:29   ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-05-24 13:41     ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-02 16:54   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-02 16:54     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-02 17:08     ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-02 17:08       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] drm/edid: keep track of alloc size in drm_do_get_edid() Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] drm/edid: add new interfaces around struct drm_edid Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] drm/edid: add drm_edid_connector_update() Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-06-02 17:09   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-02 17:09     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] drm/probe-helper: abstract .get_modes() connector helper call Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] drm/probe-helper: make .get_modes() optional, add default action Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-06-02 17:14   ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-02 17:14     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-07 11:14     ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-07 11:14       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-06-07 19:43       ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-07 19:43         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] drm/probe-helper: add .get_edid() callback Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] drm/edid: add drm_edid_raw() to access the raw EDID data Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] drm/i915/edid: convert DP, HDMI and LVDS to drm_edid Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] drm/edid: do invalid block filtering in-place Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] drm/edid: add HF-EEODB support to EDID read and allocation Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-06-03 17:13   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2022-06-03 17:13     ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-06-07 11:26     ` Jani Nikula
2022-06-07 11:26       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] drm/edid: take HF-EEODB extension count into account Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] drm/todo: add entry for converting the subsystem to struct drm_edid Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 10:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 11:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: expand on struct drm_edid usage Patchwork
2022-05-24 11:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-05-24 11:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2022-05-24 11:37   ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 11:41     ` Sarvela, Tomi P
2022-05-25  8:48       ` Jani Nikula
2022-05-24 15:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/edid: expand on struct drm_edid usage (rev2) Patchwork
2022-05-24 15:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-05-24 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2022-05-24 22:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YppBTAFXSNgaoymG@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.