All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 0/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH is followed
@ 2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

This series ensures that PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask is followed correctly
while defining all the platform specific hardware event flags. But first
this expands PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH with another four bits, to accommodate
some x86 platform event flags which were going beyond the existing mask.

This series applies on v6.0-rc4.

Changes in V2:

- Added first patch to expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
- Converted all BUILD_BUG_ON() into static_assert() 

Changes in V1:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220829065507.177781-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org

Anshuman Khandual (4):
  perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags
  arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH

 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   |  4 +++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h |  9 +++++----
 include/linux/perf_event.h   |  4 +++-
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 0/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH is followed
@ 2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

This series ensures that PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask is followed correctly
while defining all the platform specific hardware event flags. But first
this expands PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH with another four bits, to accommodate
some x86 platform event flags which were going beyond the existing mask.

This series applies on v6.0-rc4.

Changes in V2:

- Added first patch to expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
- Converted all BUILD_BUG_ON() into static_assert() 

Changes in V1:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220829065507.177781-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org

Anshuman Khandual (4):
  perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags
  arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH

 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   |  4 +++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h |  9 +++++----
 include/linux/perf_event.h   |  4 +++-
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 1/4] perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

Two hardware event flags on x86 platform has overshot PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
(0x0000ffff). These flags are PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID (0x20000) and
PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS (0x10000). Lets expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask to
accommodate those flags, and also create room for two more in the future.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index ee8b9ecdc03b..3f51fbf4a595 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event_extra {
  * PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH bits are reserved for architecture-specific
  * usage.
  */
-#define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x0000ffff
+#define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x000fffff
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT		0x80000000
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 1/4] perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

Two hardware event flags on x86 platform has overshot PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
(0x0000ffff). These flags are PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID (0x20000) and
PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS (0x10000). Lets expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask to
accommodate those flags, and also create room for two more in the future.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index ee8b9ecdc03b..3f51fbf4a595 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event_extra {
  * PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH bits are reserved for architecture-specific
  * usage.
  */
-#define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x0000ffff
+#define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x000fffff
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT		0x80000000
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 2/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags
  2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

This just ensures that PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic
hardware event flags.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3f51fbf4a595..10e23a0f9db0 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event_extra {
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x000fffff
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT		0x80000000
 
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) == 0);
+
 /**
  * struct hw_perf_event - performance event hardware details:
  */
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 2/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86

This just ensures that PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic
hardware event flags.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 3f51fbf4a595..10e23a0f9db0 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event_extra {
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH			0x000fffff
 #define PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT		0x80000000
 
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_USER_READ_CNT & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) == 0);
+
 /**
  * struct hw_perf_event - performance event hardware details:
  */
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Will Deacon,
	Catalin Marinas

Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.

Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 4 +++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index b65a7d9640e1..db8a0a841062 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
  * This allows us to perform the check, i.e, perfmon_capable(),
  * in the context of the event owner, once, during the event_init().
  */
-#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			BIT(0)
+#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			0x00001
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX) == SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX);
 
 static void set_spe_event_has_cx(struct perf_event *event)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 0407a38b470a..0356cb6a215d 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
 /*
  * ARM PMU hw_event flags
  */
-/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
-#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
-/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
-#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
+#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
+#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT);
 
 #define HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED		0xFFFF
 #define C(_x)				PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##_x
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Will Deacon,
	Catalin Marinas

Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.

Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 4 +++-
 include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 +++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
index b65a7d9640e1..db8a0a841062 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
@@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
  * This allows us to perform the check, i.e, perfmon_capable(),
  * in the context of the event owner, once, during the event_init().
  */
-#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			BIT(0)
+#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			0x00001
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX) == SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX);
 
 static void set_spe_event_has_cx(struct perf_event *event)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 0407a38b470a..0356cb6a215d 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
 /*
  * ARM PMU hw_event flags
  */
-/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
-#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
-/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
-#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
+#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
+#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT);
 
 #define HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED		0xFFFF
 #define C(_x)				PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##_x
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
 #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
 #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
 
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
+				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
+
 static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN;
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-05  5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, peterz
  Cc: Anshuman Khandual, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
 #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
 #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
 
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
+
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
+static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
+				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
+
 static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN;
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-05  9:10     ` James Clark
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: James Clark @ 2022-09-05  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel,
	x86, Will Deacon, Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel,
	linux-perf-users, peterz



On 05/09/2022 06:42, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 4 +++-
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 +++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index b65a7d9640e1..db8a0a841062 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
>   * This allows us to perform the check, i.e, perfmon_capable(),
>   * in the context of the event owner, once, during the event_init().
>   */
> -#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			BIT(0)
> +#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			0x00001
> +
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX) == SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX);
>  
>  static void set_spe_event_has_cx(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index 0407a38b470a..0356cb6a215d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
>  /*
>   * ARM PMU hw_event flags
>   */
> -/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
> -/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
> +

Minor nit:

I don't think changing the definitions to hex adds anything except more
noise in the git blame.

Either way, for the whole set:

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>

> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT);
>  
>  #define HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED		0xFFFF
>  #define C(_x)				PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##_x

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-05  9:10     ` James Clark
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: James Clark @ 2022-09-05  9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel,
	x86, Will Deacon, Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel,
	linux-perf-users, peterz



On 05/09/2022 06:42, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH.
> 
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c   | 4 +++-
>  include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 9 +++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index b65a7d9640e1..db8a0a841062 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,9 @@
>   * This allows us to perform the check, i.e, perfmon_capable(),
>   * in the context of the event owner, once, during the event_init().
>   */
> -#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			BIT(0)
> +#define SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX			0x00001
> +
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX) == SPE_PMU_HW_FLAGS_CX);
>  
>  static void set_spe_event_has_cx(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> index 0407a38b470a..0356cb6a215d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
>  /*
>   * ARM PMU hw_event flags
>   */
> -/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
> -/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
> +

Minor nit:

I don't think changing the definitions to hex adds anything except more
noise in the git blame.

Either way, for the whole set:

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>

> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT) == ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT);
>  
>  #define HW_OP_UNSUPPORTED		0xFFFF
>  #define C(_x)				PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##_x

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  9:10     ` James Clark
@ 2022-09-06  2:57       ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-06  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Clark
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel,
	x86, Will Deacon, Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel,
	linux-perf-users, peterz



On 9/5/22 14:40, James Clark wrote:
>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> @@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
>>  /*
>>   * ARM PMU hw_event flags
>>   */
>> -/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
>> -/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> +
> Minor nit:
> 
> I don't think changing the definitions to hex adds anything except more
> noise in the git blame.

The idea here was just to make these five digit hex, in accordance with
PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask like the existing x86 platform event flags.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-06  2:57       ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-06  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Clark
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland,
	Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel,
	x86, Will Deacon, Catalin Marinas, linux-kernel,
	linux-perf-users, peterz



On 9/5/22 14:40, James Clark wrote:
>> --- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
>> @@ -24,10 +24,11 @@
>>  /*
>>   * ARM PMU hw_event flags
>>   */
>> -/* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		1
>> -/* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> -#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		2
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_64BIT		0x00001 /* Event uses a 64bit counter */
>> +#define ARMPMU_EVT_47BIT		0x00002 /* Event uses a 47bit counter */
>> +
> Minor nit:
> 
> I don't think changing the definitions to hex adds anything except more
> noise in the git blame.

The idea here was just to make these five digit hex, in accordance with
PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask like the existing x86 platform event flags.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-06 19:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-09-06 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>  
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
> +
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
> +				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);


That's not half tedious...

How about something like so?

---
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
 	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
 }
 
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
+	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
+
 /*
  * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
  */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
-
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
+enum {
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+};
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
+
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
+	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
+		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
+
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
 
 static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
 {
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+
+/*
+ * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
+ */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
+PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
+			/*	0x00080	*/
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
+PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
+PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
+PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
+PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-06 19:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-09-06 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>  
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
> +
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
> +				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);


That's not half tedious...

How about something like so?

---
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
 	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
 }
 
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
+	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
+
 /*
  * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
  */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
-
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
-#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
+enum {
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+};
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
+
+#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
+	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
+		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
+
+#include "perf_event_flags.h"
+
+#undef PERF_ARCH
 
 static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
 {
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+
+/*
+ * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
+ */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
+PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
+			/*	0x00080	*/
+PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
+PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
+PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
+PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
+PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
+PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
+PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-06 19:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2022-09-07  5:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-07  5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov



On 9/7/22 00:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
>>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
>>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>>  
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
>> +
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
>> +				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
> 
> 
> That's not half tedious...
> 
> How about something like so?

Makes sense, will fold this back. Could I also include your "Signed-off-by:"
for this patch ?

- Anshuman

> 
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
>  	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
>  }
>  
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
> +	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
> +
>  /*
>   * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
>   */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> -
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
> +enum {
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +};
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
> +
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
> +	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
> +		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
> +
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
>  
>  static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +
> +/*
> + * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> + */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> +PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> +			/*	0x00080	*/
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
> +PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> +PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> +PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> +PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-07  5:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2022-09-07  5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov



On 9/7/22 00:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
>>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> index ba3d24a6a4ec..12136a33e9b7 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,26 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(struct event_constraint *c, u64 ecode)
>>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>>  #define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>>  
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC) == PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC);
>> +
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN) == PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT) == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS) == PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS);
>> +static_assert((PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID)
>> +				   == PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID);
> 
> 
> That's not half tedious...
> 
> How about something like so?

Makes sense, will fold this back. Could I also include your "Signed-off-by:"
for this patch ?

- Anshuman

> 
> ---
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
>  	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
>  }
>  
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
> +	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
> +
>  /*
>   * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
>   */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> -
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
> +enum {
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +};
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
> +
> +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
> +	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
> +		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
> +
> +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> +
> +#undef PERF_ARCH
>  
>  static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +
> +/*
> + * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> + */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> +PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> +			/*	0x00080	*/
> +PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
> +PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> +PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> +PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> +PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> +PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
  2022-09-07  5:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2022-09-07  8:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-09-07  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:57:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

> > How about something like so?
> 
> Makes sense, will fold this back. Could I also include your "Signed-off-by:"
> for this patch ?
> 

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

> > 
> > ---
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > @@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
> >  	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
> > +	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> >   */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> > -
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
> > +enum {
> > +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> > +};
> > +
> > +#undef PERF_ARCH
> > +
> > +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
> > +	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
> > +		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
> > +
> > +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> > +
> > +#undef PERF_ARCH
> >  
> >  static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
> >  {
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> > + */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> > +PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> > +PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> > +			/*	0x00080	*/
> > +PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
> > +PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> > +PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> > +PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> > +PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH
@ 2022-09-07  8:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-09-07  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, James Clark, Ingo Molnar,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin,
	Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel, x86, Thomas Gleixner,
	Borislav Petkov

On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 10:57:35AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:

> > How about something like so?
> 
> Makes sense, will fold this back. Could I also include your "Signed-off-by:"
> for this patch ?
> 

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

> > 
> > ---
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> > @@ -64,27 +64,25 @@ static inline bool constraint_match(stru
> >  	return ((ecode & c->cmask) - c->code) <= (u64)c->size;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)	\
> > +	PERF_X86_EVENT_##name = val,
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> >   */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT	0x00001 /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST		0x00002 /* st data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST_HSW	0x00004 /* haswell style datala, store */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LD_HSW	0x00008 /* haswell style datala, load */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_NA_HSW	0x00010 /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL		0x00020 /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC		0x00040 /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> > -
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_EXCL_ACCT	0x00100 /* accounted EXCL event */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD	0x00200 /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LARGE_PEBS	0x00400 /* use large PEBS */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_VIA_PT	0x00800 /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PAIR		0x01000 /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_LBR_SELECT	0x02000 /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_TOPDOWN		0x04000 /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_STLAT	0x08000 /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS		0x10000 /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> > -#define PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID	0x20000 /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
> > +enum {
> > +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> > +};
> > +
> > +#undef PERF_ARCH
> > +
> > +#define PERF_ARCH(name, val)						\
> > +	static_assert((PERF_X86_EVENT_##name & PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH) ==	\
> > +		      PERF_X86_EVENT_##name);
> > +
> > +#include "perf_event_flags.h"
> > +
> > +#undef PERF_ARCH
> >  
> >  static inline bool is_topdown_count(struct perf_event *event)
> >  {
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * struct hw_perf_event.flags flags
> > + */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LDLAT,		0x00001) /* ld+ldlat data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST,		0x00002) /* st data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_ST_HSW,		0x00004) /* haswell style datala, store */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LD_HSW,		0x00008) /* haswell style datala, load */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_NA_HSW,		0x00010) /* haswell style datala, unknown */
> > +PERF_ARCH(EXCL,			0x00020) /* HT exclusivity on counter */
> > +PERF_ARCH(DYNAMIC,		0x00040) /* dynamic alloc'd constraint */
> > +			/*	0x00080	*/
> > +PERF_ARCH(EXCL_ACCT,		0x00100) /* accounted EXCL event */
> > +PERF_ARCH(AUTO_RELOAD,		0x00200) /* use PEBS auto-reload */
> > +PERF_ARCH(LARGE_PEBS,		0x00400) /* use large PEBS */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_VIA_PT,		0x00800) /* use PT buffer for PEBS */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PAIR,			0x01000) /* Large Increment per Cycle */
> > +PERF_ARCH(LBR_SELECT,		0x02000) /* Save/Restore MSR_LBR_SELECT */
> > +PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN,		0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT,		0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS,		0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
> > +PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID,	0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-07  8:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-05  5:42 [PATCH V2 0/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH is followed Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] perf/core: Expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] perf/core: Assert PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic flags Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] arm64/perf: Assert all platform event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  9:10   ` James Clark
2022-09-05  9:10     ` James Clark
2022-09-06  2:57     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06  2:57       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] x86/perf: " Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-05  5:42   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-06 19:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  5:27     ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07  5:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07  8:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-07  8:30         ` Peter Zijlstra

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.