Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] treewide: use prandom_u32_max() when possible

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 06:45:25AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Kees,
> 
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 09:16:50PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 11:48:40PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > Rather than incurring a division or requesting too many random bytes for
> > > the given range, use the prandom_u32_max() function, which only takes
> > > the minimum required bytes from the RNG and avoids divisions.
> > 
> > Yes please!
> > 
> > Since this is a treewide patch, it's helpful for (me at least) doing
> > reviews to detail the mechanism of the transformation.
> 
> This is hand done. There were also various wrong seds done. And then I'd
> edit the .diff manually, and then reapply it, as an iterative process.
> No internet on the airplane, and oddly no spatch already on my laptop (I
> think I had some Gentoo ocaml issues at some point and removed it?).
> 
> > e.g. I imagine this could be done with something like Coccinelle and
> 
> Feel free to check the work here by using Coccinelle if you're into
> that.

Generally these series are a lot easier to review if it is structured
as a patches doing all the unusual stuff that had to be by hand
followed by an unmodified Coccinelle/sed/etc handling the simple
stuff.

Especially stuff that is reworking the logic beyond simple
substitution should be one patch per subsystem not rolled into a giant
one patch conversion.

This makes the whole workflow better because the hand-done stuff can
have a chance to flow through subsystem trees.

Thanks,
Jason

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/