All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines)
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:56:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWZUDfU4XVRxkngN@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231122143833.7-8-francois.dugast@intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 02:38:26PM +0000, Francois Dugast wrote:
> The uAPI provides queries which return arrays of elements. As of now
> the format used in the struct is different depending on which element
> is queried. Fix this for engines by applying the pattern below:
> 
>         struct drm_xe_query_Xs {
>            __u32 num_Xs;
>            struct drm_xe_X Xs[];
>            ...
>         }
> 
> Instead of directly returning an array of struct
> drm_xe_query_engine_info, a new struct drm_xe_query_engines is
> introduced. It contains itself an array of struct drm_xe_engine
> which holds the information about each engine.
> 
> v2: Use plural for struct drm_xe_query_engines as multiple engines
>     are returned (José Roberto de Souza)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c | 31 ++++++++------
>  include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h     | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> index 28ea6dbf1cf9..8bf0fe6b09e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_query.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ static size_t calc_hw_engine_info_size(struct xe_device *xe)
>  			i++;
>  		}
>  
> -	return i * sizeof(struct drm_xe_query_engine_info);
> +	return sizeof(struct drm_xe_query_engines) +
> +		i * sizeof(struct drm_xe_engine);
>  }
>  
>  typedef u64 (*__ktime_func_t)(void);
> @@ -186,9 +187,9 @@ static int query_engines(struct xe_device *xe,
>  			 struct drm_xe_device_query *query)
>  {
>  	size_t size = calc_hw_engine_info_size(xe);
> -	struct drm_xe_query_engine_info __user *query_ptr =
> +	struct drm_xe_query_engines __user *query_ptr =
>  		u64_to_user_ptr(query->data);
> -	struct drm_xe_query_engine_info *hw_engine_info;
> +	struct drm_xe_query_engines *engines;
>  	struct xe_hw_engine *hwe;
>  	enum xe_hw_engine_id id;
>  	struct xe_gt *gt;
> @@ -202,8 +203,8 @@ static int query_engines(struct xe_device *xe,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	hw_engine_info = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!hw_engine_info)
> +	engines = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!engines)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	for_each_gt(gt, xe, gt_id)
> @@ -211,22 +212,26 @@ static int query_engines(struct xe_device *xe,
>  			if (xe_hw_engine_is_reserved(hwe))
>  				continue;
>  
> -			hw_engine_info[i].instance.engine_class =
> +			engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class =
>  				xe_to_user_engine_class[hwe->class];
> -			hw_engine_info[i].instance.engine_instance =
> +			engines->engines[i].instance.engine_instance =
>  				hwe->logical_instance;
> -			hw_engine_info[i].instance.gt_id = gt->info.id;
> -			hw_engine_info[i].instance.pad = 0;
> -			memset(hw_engine_info->reserved, 0, sizeof(hw_engine_info->reserved));
> +			engines->engines[i].instance.gt_id = gt->info.id;
> +			engines->engines[i].instance.pad = 0;
> +			memset(engines->engines[i].reserved, 0,
> +			       sizeof(engines->engines[i].reserved));
>  
>  			i++;
>  		}
>  
> -	if (copy_to_user(query_ptr, hw_engine_info, size)) {
> -		kfree(hw_engine_info);
> +	engines->pad = 0;

we don't need to initialize the pad. kzalloc already takes care of that.
But also I see that the one in region above was already initialized and
I don't see a big problem.

this at least is consistent with the above, but we could also remove the
one above or not touching this... anyway you decide to go:

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

> +	engines->num_engines = i;
> +
> +	if (copy_to_user(query_ptr, engines, size)) {
> +		kfree(engines);
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  	}
> -	kfree(hw_engine_info);
> +	kfree(engines);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> index e38e7b701edf..fe911728fd97 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
> @@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ struct xe_user_extension {
>  /**
>   * struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance - instance of an engine class
>   *
> - * It is returned as part of the @drm_xe_query_engine_info, but it also is
> - * used as the input of engine selection for both @drm_xe_exec_queue_create
> - * and @drm_xe_query_engine_cycles
> + * It is returned as part of the @drm_xe_engine, but it also is used as
> + * the input of engine selection for both @drm_xe_exec_queue_create and
> + * @drm_xe_query_engine_cycles
>   *
>   */
>  struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance {
> @@ -153,13 +153,9 @@ struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance {
>  };
>  
>  /**
> - * struct drm_xe_query_engine_info - describe hardware engine
> - *
> - * If a query is made with a struct @drm_xe_device_query where .query
> - * is equal to %DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES, then the reply uses an array of
> - * struct @drm_xe_query_engine_info in .data.
> + * struct drm_xe_engine - describe hardware engine
>   */
> -struct drm_xe_query_engine_info {
> +struct drm_xe_engine {
>  	/** @instance: The @drm_xe_engine_class_instance */
>  	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance instance;
>  
> @@ -167,6 +163,22 @@ struct drm_xe_query_engine_info {
>  	__u64 reserved[5];
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * struct drm_xe_query_engines - describe engines
> + *
> + * If a query is made with a struct @drm_xe_device_query where .query
> + * is equal to %DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES, then the reply uses an array of
> + * struct @drm_xe_query_engines in .data.
> + */
> +struct drm_xe_query_engines {
> +	/** @num_engines: number of engines returned in @engines */
> +	__u32 num_engines;
> +	/** @pad: MBZ */
> +	__u32 pad;
> +	/** @engines: The returned engines for this device */
> +	struct drm_xe_engine engines[];
> +};
> +
>  /**
>   * enum drm_xe_memory_class - Supported memory classes.
>   */
> @@ -466,28 +478,32 @@ struct drm_xe_query_topology_mask {
>   *
>   * .. code-block:: C
>   *
> - *	struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
> - *	struct drm_xe_device_query query = {
> - *		.extensions = 0,
> - *		.query = DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES,
> - *		.size = 0,
> - *		.data = 0,
> - *	};
> - *	ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query);
> - *	hwe = malloc(query.size);
> - *	query.data = (uintptr_t)hwe;
> - *	ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query);
> - *	int num_engines = query.size / sizeof(*hwe);
> - *	for (int i = 0; i < num_engines; i++) {
> - *		printf("Engine %d: %s\n", i,
> - *			hwe[i].engine_class == DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER ? "RENDER":
> - *			hwe[i].engine_class == DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY ? "COPY":
> - *			hwe[i].engine_class == DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE ? "VIDEO_DECODE":
> - *			hwe[i].engine_class == DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE ? "VIDEO_ENHANCE":
> - *			hwe[i].engine_class == DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE ? "COMPUTE":
> - *			"UNKNOWN");
> - *	}
> - *	free(hwe);
> + *     struct drm_xe_query_engines *engines;
> + *     struct drm_xe_device_query query = {
> + *         .extensions = 0,
> + *         .query = DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES,
> + *         .size = 0,
> + *         .data = 0,
> + *     };
> + *     ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query);
> + *     engines = malloc(query.size);
> + *     query.data = (uintptr_t)engines;
> + *     ioctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_XE_DEVICE_QUERY, &query);
> + *     for (int i = 0; i < engines->num_engines; i++) {
> + *         printf("Engine %d: %s\n", i,
> + *             engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class ==
> + *                 DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER ? "RENDER":
> + *             engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class ==
> + *                 DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY ? "COPY":
> + *             engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class ==
> + *                 DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_DECODE ? "VIDEO_DECODE":
> + *             engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class ==
> + *                 DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE ? "VIDEO_ENHANCE":
> + *             engines->engines[i].instance.engine_class ==
> + *                 DRM_XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COMPUTE ? "COMPUTE":
> + *             "UNKNOWN");
> + *     }
> + *     free(engines);
>   */
>  struct drm_xe_device_query {
>  	/** @extensions: Pointer to the first extension struct, if any */
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-28 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-22 14:38 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 00/14] uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/xe: Extend drm_xe_vm_bind_op Francois Dugast
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/xe/uapi: Separate bo_create placement from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 19:36   ` Welty, Brian
2023-11-29 20:41     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/xe: Make DRM_XE_DEVICE_QUERY_ENGINES future proof Francois Dugast
2023-11-28 21:17   ` Matthew Brost
2023-11-29 16:54     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-29 12:35       ` Matthew Brost
2023-11-29 20:04         ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-29 22:52           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/xe/uapi: Reject bo creation of unaligned size Francois Dugast
2023-11-24 18:15   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (memory regions) Francois Dugast
2023-11-24 18:19   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-28 20:51     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-29 12:33       ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-30 20:53   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (gt) Francois Dugast
2023-11-28 20:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2023-11-29 18:30   ` Matt Roper
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/xe/uapi: Align on a common way to return arrays (engines) Francois Dugast
2023-11-28 20:56   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/xe/uapi: Split xe_sync types from flags Francois Dugast
2023-11-28 21:19   ` Matthew Brost
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/xe/uapi: Kill tile_mask Francois Dugast
2023-11-29  9:07   ` Matthew Brost
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/xe/uapi: Crystal Reference Clock updates Francois Dugast
2023-11-24 18:38   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-29 14:08     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 18:33       ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/xe/uapi: Remove bogus engine list from the wait_user_fence IOCTL Francois Dugast
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/xe/uapi: Add Tile ID information to the GT info query Francois Dugast
2023-11-24 18:45   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-27 14:08     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-27 14:20       ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-29 18:33         ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/xe/uapi: Fix various struct padding for 64b alignment Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 17:02   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-29 17:39     ` Francois Dugast
2023-11-22 14:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/xe/uapi: Move xe_exec after xe_exec_queue Francois Dugast
2023-11-29 18:34   ` Souza, Jose
2023-11-23 14:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for uAPI Alignment - Cleanup and future proof (rev5) Patchwork
2023-11-23 14:14 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-11-23 14:15 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-11-23 14:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-11-23 14:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2023-11-23 14:24 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: success " Patchwork
2023-11-23 15:01 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZWZUDfU4XVRxkngN@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=francois.dugast@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.