All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Håkon Løvdal" <hlovdal@gmail.com>
To: "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: "Hannes Eder" <hannes@hanneseder.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:44:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a01a16b50812221544x45c3559ap808ac0095ee8f01@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hc4voo2a.fsf@maximus.localdomain>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 2113 bytes --]

2008/12/22 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>:>> --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c>> +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c>> @@ -882,9 +882,9 @@ static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int location)>>       void __iomem *mdio_addr = np->base + MIICtrl + (phy_id<<7) + (location<<2);>>       int result, boguscnt=1000;>>       /* ??? Should we add a busy-wait here? */>> -     do>> +     do {>>               result = readl(mdio_addr);>> -     while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);>> +     } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);>>       if (boguscnt == 0)>>               return 0;>>       if ((result & 0xffff) == 0xffff)>>> I don't know how one could think the above is an improvement.
For this specific issue the important aspect is to improve readability(and not just eventually satisfy some warning from a tool), which Iassume there is no disagrement on. Now what constitutes improvedreadbility on the other hand is another issue, and I guess there arenext to as many oppinions as developers... :)I would most certainly prefer to have code look consistently and alwayshave brackets, even in the case of just one body line.
Of secondary importance is the benefit that always using bracketsmakes them much more merge friendly. Consider the following scenario:
Common base:        do                result = readl(mdio_addr);        while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
Branch 1        do {                result = readl(mdio_addr);                do_something();        } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
Branch 2        do                result = readl(mdio_addr);        while (NOT_OK(result) && --boguscnt > 0);
In this case if both branch 1 and 2 are merged, there will be a merge conflictthat has to be resolved manually. If the brackets had been in place from thestart tools should be able to resolv this automatically.
BR HÃ¥kon Løvdalÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Håkon Løvdal" <hlovdal@gmail.com>
To: "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: "Hannes Eder" <hannes@hanneseder.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:44:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a01a16b50812221544x45c3559ap808ac0095ee8f01@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hc4voo2a.fsf@maximus.localdomain>

2008/12/22 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>:
>> --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c
>> @@ -882,9 +882,9 @@ static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int location)
>>       void __iomem *mdio_addr = np->base + MIICtrl + (phy_id<<7) + (location<<2);
>>       int result, boguscnt=1000;
>>       /* ??? Should we add a busy-wait here? */
>> -     do
>> +     do {
>>               result = readl(mdio_addr);
>> -     while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
>> +     } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
>>       if (boguscnt == 0)
>>               return 0;
>>       if ((result & 0xffff) == 0xffff)
>
>
> I don't know how one could think the above is an improvement.

For this specific issue the important aspect is to improve readability
(and not just eventually satisfy some warning from a tool), which I
assume there is no disagrement on. Now what constitutes improved
readbility on the other hand is another issue, and I guess there are
next to as many oppinions as developers... :)
I would most certainly prefer to have code look consistently and always
have brackets, even in the case of just one body line.

Of secondary importance is the benefit that always using brackets
makes them much more merge friendly. Consider the following scenario:

Common base:
        do
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
        while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);

Branch 1
        do {
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
                do_something();
        } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);

Branch 2
        do
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
        while (NOT_OK(result) && --boguscnt > 0);

In this case if both branch 1 and 2 are merged, there will be a merge conflict
that has to be resolved manually. If the brackets had been in place from the
start tools should be able to resolv this automatically.

BR Håkon Løvdal

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Håkon Løvdal" <hlovdal@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Hannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:44:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a01a16b50812221544x45c3559ap808ac0095ee8f01@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hc4voo2a.fsf@maximus.localdomain>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254", Size: 2123 bytes --]

2008/12/22 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>:
>> --- a/drivers/net/starfire.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/starfire.c
>> @@ -882,9 +882,9 @@ static int mdio_read(struct net_device *dev, int phy_id, int location)
>>       void __iomem *mdio_addr = np->base + MIICtrl + (phy_id<<7) + (location<<2);
>>       int result, boguscnt\x1000;
>>       /* ??? Should we add a busy-wait here? */
>> -     do
>> +     do {
>>               result = readl(mdio_addr);
>> -     while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
>> +     } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);
>>       if (boguscnt = 0)
>>               return 0;
>>       if ((result & 0xffff) = 0xffff)
>
>
> I don't know how one could think the above is an improvement.

For this specific issue the important aspect is to improve readability
(and not just eventually satisfy some warning from a tool), which I
assume there is no disagrement on. Now what constitutes improved
readbility on the other hand is another issue, and I guess there are
next to as many oppinions as developers... :)
I would most certainly prefer to have code look consistently and always
have brackets, even in the case of just one body line.

Of secondary importance is the benefit that always using brackets
makes them much more merge friendly. Consider the following scenario:

Common base:
        do
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
        while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);

Branch 1
        do {
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
                do_something();
        } while ((result & 0xC0000000) != 0x80000000 && --boguscnt > 0);

Branch 2
        do
                result = readl(mdio_addr);
        while (NOT_OK(result) && --boguscnt > 0);

In this case if both branch 1 and 2 are merged, there will be a merge conflict
that has to be resolved manually. If the brackets had been in place from the
start tools should be able to resolv this automatically.

BR Håkon Løvdal
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¤z¹Þ—øÚž+h®ÏâžØ^n‡r¡ö¦zË\x1aëh™¨è­Ú&£ûàz¿äz¹Þ—ú+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿÿïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x0fæj:+v‰¨þ)ߣøm

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-22 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 149+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-22 19:14 [PATCH 00/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:14 ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:14 ` [PATCH 01/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: use ANSI-style function declaration Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:14   ` [PATCH 01/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: use ANSI-style Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:53   ` [PATCH 01/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: use ANSI-style function declaration David Miller
2008-12-26  7:53     ` [PATCH 01/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: use ANSI-style David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 22:14   ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-22 22:14     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-22 23:44     ` Håkon Løvdal [this message]
2008-12-22 23:44       ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-12-22 23:44       ` Håkon Løvdal
2008-12-23 16:31       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 16:31         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 17:26         ` Harvey Harrison
2008-12-23 17:26           ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while Harvey Harrison
2008-12-23 17:36           ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 17:36             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 18:08             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-23 18:08               ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while Linus Torvalds
2008-12-23 23:18               ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 23:18                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-23 23:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-23 23:38                   ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while Linus Torvalds
2008-12-24  2:03                   ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-24  2:03                     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-24  2:10                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-24  2:10                       ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while Linus Torvalds
2008-12-25 17:02                       ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-25 17:02                         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-25  6:17                     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-12-25  6:17                       ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a Junio C Hamano
2008-12-29 14:35                   ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Hannes Eder
2008-12-29 14:35                     ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:55   ` David Miller
2008-12-26  7:55     ` [PATCH 02/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make do-while David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued expression Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  0:17   ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued expression David Miller
2008-12-26  0:17     ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning David Miller
2008-12-26 14:39     ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued expression Hannes Eder
2008-12-26 14:39       ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26 19:59     ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-26 19:59       ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning Randy Dunlap
2008-12-27 19:11       ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued expression Hannes Eder
2008-12-27 19:11         ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-27 19:20         ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-27 19:20           ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-27 21:38           ` [PATCH] Makefile: disable sparse warning "returning void-valued expression" Hannes Eder
2008-12-27 21:38             ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-27 21:57             ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-27 21:57               ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-26  7:56   ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning void-valued expression David Miller
2008-12-26  7:56     ` [PATCH 03/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warning: returning David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 04/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:57   ` David Miller
2008-12-26  7:57     ` [PATCH 04/27] drivers/net: fix sparse warnings: make symbols David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 05/27] drivers/net/arcnet: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` [PATCH 05/27] drivers/net/arcnet: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:57   ` [PATCH 05/27] drivers/net/arcnet: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  7:57     ` [PATCH 05/27] drivers/net/arcnet: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 06/27] drivers/net/atlx: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` [PATCH 06/27] drivers/net/atlx: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:58   ` [PATCH 06/27] drivers/net/atlx: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  7:58     ` [PATCH 06/27] drivers/net/atlx: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:15 ` [PATCH 07/27] drivers/net/bonding: fix sparse warnings: move decls to header file Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:15   ` [PATCH 07/27] drivers/net/bonding: fix sparse warnings: move decls to Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:59   ` [PATCH 07/27] drivers/net/bonding: fix sparse warnings: move decls to header file David Miller
2008-12-26  7:59     ` [PATCH 07/27] drivers/net/bonding: fix sparse warnings: move David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 08/27] drivers/net/cxgb3: comment out dead code Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  7:59   ` David Miller
2008-12-26  7:59     ` David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 09/27] drivers/net/e1000e: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` [PATCH 09/27] drivers/net/e1000e: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 10/27] drivers/net/enic: fix sparse warning: make symbol static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:01   ` David Miller
2008-12-26  8:01     ` [PATCH 10/27] drivers/net/enic: fix sparse warning: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 11/27] drivers/net/igb: remove dead code (function 'igb_read_pci_cfg') Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` [PATCH 11/27] drivers/net/igb: remove dead code (function Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 22:30   ` [PATCH 11/27] drivers/net/igb: remove dead code (function 'igb_read_pci_cfg') Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-22 22:30     ` Jeff Kirsher
2008-12-26  8:03     ` David Miller
2008-12-26  8:03       ` [PATCH 11/27] drivers/net/igb: remove dead code (function David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 12/27] drivers/net/irda: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` [PATCH 12/27] drivers/net/irda: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:03   ` [PATCH 12/27] drivers/net/irda: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:03     ` [PATCH 12/27] drivers/net/irda: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 13/27] drivers/net/ixgbe: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` [PATCH 13/27] drivers/net/ixgbe: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:04   ` [PATCH 13/27] drivers/net/ixgbe: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:04     ` [PATCH 13/27] drivers/net/ixgbe: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 14/27] drivers/net/netxen: fix sparse warnings: use NULL pointer instead of plain integer Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:16   ` [PATCH 14/27] drivers/net/netxen: fix sparse warnings: use NULL Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:04   ` [PATCH 14/27] drivers/net/netxen: fix sparse warnings: use NULL pointer instead of plain integer David Miller
2008-12-26  8:04     ` [PATCH 14/27] drivers/net/netxen: fix sparse warnings: use David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 15/27] drivers/net/qlge: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 15/27] drivers/net/qlge: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:05   ` [PATCH 15/27] drivers/net/qlge: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:05     ` [PATCH 15/27] drivers/net/qlge: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 16/27] drivers/net/skfp: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 16/27] drivers/net/skfp: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:06   ` [PATCH 16/27] drivers/net/skfp: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:06     ` [PATCH 16/27] drivers/net/skfp: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 17/27] drivers/net/tokenring: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 17/27] drivers/net/tokenring: fix sparse warnings: make Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:07   ` [PATCH 17/27] drivers/net/tokenring: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:07     ` [PATCH 17/27] drivers/net/tokenring: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 18/27] drivers/net/tulip: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 18/27] drivers/net/tulip: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:07   ` [PATCH 18/27] drivers/net/tulip: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement David Miller
2008-12-26  8:07     ` [PATCH 18/27] drivers/net/tulip: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 19/27] drivers/net/usb: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 19/27] drivers/net/usb: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:08   ` [PATCH 19/27] drivers/net/usb: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:08     ` [PATCH 19/27] drivers/net/usb: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 20/27] drivers/net/wan: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 20/27] drivers/net/wan: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 22:09   ` [PATCH 20/27] drivers/net/wan: fix sparse warnings: make do-while a compound statement Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-22 22:09     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 21/27] drivers/net/wan: fix sparse warning: make symbol static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:11   ` David Miller
2008-12-26  8:11     ` [PATCH 21/27] drivers/net/wan: fix sparse warning: make symbol David Miller
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 22/27] drivers/net/wan/z85230.c: fix sparse warnings: un-EXPORT symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` [PATCH 22/27] drivers/net/wan/z85230.c: fix sparse warnings: Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:12   ` [PATCH 22/27] drivers/net/wan/z85230.c: fix sparse warnings: un-EXPORT symbols David Miller
2008-12-26  8:12     ` [PATCH 22/27] drivers/net/wan/z85230.c: fix sparse warnings: David Miller
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 23/27] drivers/net/wireless: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` [PATCH 23/27] drivers/net/wireless: fix sparse warnings: make symbols Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:13   ` [PATCH 23/27] drivers/net/wireless: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:13     ` [PATCH 23/27] drivers/net/wireless: fix sparse warnings: make David Miller
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 24/27] drivers/net/wireless/ath9k: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` [PATCH 24/27] drivers/net/wireless/ath9k: fix sparse warnings: make Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 25/27] drivers/net/wireless/b43: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` [PATCH 25/27] drivers/net/wireless/b43: fix sparse warnings: make Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:13   ` [PATCH 25/27] drivers/net/wireless/b43: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:13     ` [PATCH 25/27] drivers/net/wireless/b43: fix sparse warnings: David Miller
2008-12-22 19:18 ` [PATCH 26/27] drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:18   ` [PATCH 26/27] drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00: fix sparse warnings: make Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:14   ` [PATCH 26/27] drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:14     ` [PATCH 26/27] drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00: fix sparse David Miller
2008-12-22 19:19 ` [PATCH 27/27] drivers/net/wireless/prism54: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static Hannes Eder
2008-12-22 19:19   ` [PATCH 27/27] drivers/net/wireless/prism54: fix sparse warnings: make Hannes Eder
2008-12-26  8:15   ` [PATCH 27/27] drivers/net/wireless/prism54: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static David Miller
2008-12-26  8:15     ` [PATCH 27/27] drivers/net/wireless/prism54: fix sparse David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a01a16b50812221544x45c3559ap808ac0095ee8f01@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hlovdal@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@hanneseder.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.