All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
@ 2018-05-09 11:00 ` Sekhar Nori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sekhar Nori @ 2018-05-09 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller
  Cc: Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap, netdev, Andrew Lunn, Sekhar Nori

A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
error to be returned.

Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
this issue.

Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
---
v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.

The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
reproduce this.

 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
@@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
 static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
 {
 	struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
-	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
+	u32 val, ret;
 
-	while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
-		if (__raw_readl(&regs->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
-			return 0;
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout(&regs->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
+				 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
+		return ret;
 	}
-	dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
-	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int davinci_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int phy_reg)
-- 
2.16.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
@ 2018-05-09 11:00 ` Sekhar Nori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sekhar Nori @ 2018-05-09 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S . Miller
  Cc: Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap, netdev, Andrew Lunn, Sekhar Nori

A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
error to be returned.

Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
this issue.

Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
---
v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.

The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
reproduce this.

 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
@@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
 static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
 {
 	struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
-	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
+	u32 val, ret;
 
-	while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
-		if (__raw_readl(&regs->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
-			return 0;
+	ret = readl_poll_timeout(&regs->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
+				 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
+		return ret;
 	}
-	dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
-	return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int davinci_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_id, int phy_reg)
-- 
2.16.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
  2018-05-09 11:00 ` Sekhar Nori
  (?)
@ 2018-05-09 13:30 ` Andrew Lunn
  2018-05-09 15:46     ` Sekhar Nori
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2018-05-09 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sekhar Nori; +Cc: David S . Miller, Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap, netdev

On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
> in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
> error to be returned.
> 
> Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
> this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
> ---
> v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.
> 
> The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
> been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
> non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
> reproduce this.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>  static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
> -	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
> +	u32 val, ret;
>  
> -	while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
> -		if (__raw_readl(&regs->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
> -			return 0;
> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(&regs->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
> +				 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> +		return ret;
>  	}
> -	dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> -	return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }

Hi Sekhar

You could simplify this to:

> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
> +	return ret;

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
  2018-05-09 13:30 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2018-05-09 15:46     ` Sekhar Nori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sekhar Nori @ 2018-05-09 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: David S . Miller, Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap, netdev

On Wednesday 09 May 2018 07:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
>> in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
>> error to be returned.
>>
>> Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
>> this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.
>>
>> The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
>> been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
>> non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
>> reproduce this.
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>  #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>>  static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>>  {
>>  	struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
>> -	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
>> +	u32 val, ret;
>>  
>> -	while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
>> -		if (__raw_readl(&regs->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
>> -			return 0;
>> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(&regs->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
>> +				 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> +		return ret;
>>  	}
>> -	dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> -	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> Hi Sekhar
> 
> You could simplify this to:
> 
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> +	return ret;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

Indeed. v3 sent.

Thanks,
Sekhar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout
@ 2018-05-09 15:46     ` Sekhar Nori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sekhar Nori @ 2018-05-09 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn; +Cc: David S . Miller, Grygorii Strashko, linux-omap, netdev

On Wednesday 09 May 2018 07:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:30:24PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> A well timed kernel preemption in the time_after() loop
>> in wait_for_idle() can result in a spurious timeout
>> error to be returned.
>>
>> Fix it by using readl_poll_timeout() which takes care of
>> this issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v2: use readl_poll_timeout() per suggestion from Andrew.
>>
>> The issue has not been personally observed by me, but has
>> been reported by users. Sending for next-next given the
>> non-critical nature. There is seems to be no easy way to
>> reproduce this.
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c | 15 +++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> index 3c33f4504d8e..d073432a5dbe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_mdio.c
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>>  #include <linux/err.h>
>>  #include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>  #include <linux/davinci_emac.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>> @@ -227,14 +228,16 @@ static inline int wait_for_user_access(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>>  static inline int wait_for_idle(struct davinci_mdio_data *data)
>>  {
>>  	struct davinci_mdio_regs __iomem *regs = data->regs;
>> -	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MDIO_TIMEOUT);
>> +	u32 val, ret;
>>  
>> -	while (time_after(timeout, jiffies)) {
>> -		if (__raw_readl(&regs->control) & CONTROL_IDLE)
>> -			return 0;
>> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(&regs->control, val, val & CONTROL_IDLE,
>> +				 0, MDIO_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> +		return ret;
>>  	}
>> -	dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> -	return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
> 
> Hi Sekhar
> 
> You could simplify this to:
> 
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		dev_err(data->dev, "timed out waiting for idle\n");
>> +	return ret;
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

Indeed. v3 sent.

Thanks,
Sekhar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-09 15:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-09 11:00 [PATCH v2 net-next] drivers: net: davinci_mdio: prevent spurious timeout Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 11:00 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 13:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-05-09 15:46   ` Sekhar Nori
2018-05-09 15:46     ` Sekhar Nori

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.