All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	<john.stultz@linaro.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	<richardcochran@gmail.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<steve.capper@arm.com>, <kaly.xin@arm.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>,
	<nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/8] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:47:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a13a4f9554f36a46781308358fc63519@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125104506.36850-4-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2019-11-25 10:45, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which 
> includs
> large part of arch-specific code.  This patch move all of those code
> into new arch related file in the same directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                        |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} | 77 +++++-------------
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c                   | 87 
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h               | 12 +++
>  4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} (63%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h

[...]

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h 
> b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e5dd386f6664
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.

I think you should live the original copyright assignment here.
This really isn't anything new.

> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(unsigned long *cycle,
> +		struct timespec64 *tspec, void *cs);

Why is this include file in asm-generic? This isn't a kernel-wide API.

I think it should be sitting in drivers/ptp, as it is only shared 
between
the generic and arch-specific stuff.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: justin.he@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	yangbo.lu@nxp.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	nd@arm.com, will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/8] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:47:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a13a4f9554f36a46781308358fc63519@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125104506.36850-4-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2019-11-25 10:45, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which 
> includs
> large part of arch-specific code.  This patch move all of those code
> into new arch related file in the same directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                        |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} | 77 +++++-------------
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c                   | 87 
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h               | 12 +++
>  4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} (63%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h

[...]

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h 
> b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e5dd386f6664
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.

I think you should live the original copyright assignment here.
This really isn't anything new.

> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(unsigned long *cycle,
> +		struct timespec64 *tspec, void *cs);

Why is this include file in asm-generic? This isn't a kernel-wide API.

I think it should be sitting in drivers/ptp, as it is only shared 
between
the generic and arch-specific stuff.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com,
	kaly.xin@arm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org, yangbo.lu@nxp.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, nd@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 3/8] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent.
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:47:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a13a4f9554f36a46781308358fc63519@www.loen.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125104506.36850-4-jianyong.wu@arm.com>

On 2019-11-25 10:45, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Currently, ptp_kvm modules implementation is only for x86 which 
> includs
> large part of arch-specific code.  This patch move all of those code
> into new arch related file in the same directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ptp/Makefile                        |  1 +
>  drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} | 77 +++++-------------
>  drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c                   | 87 
> +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h               | 12 +++
>  4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/ptp/{ptp_kvm.c => ptp_kvm_common.c} (63%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/ptp/ptp_kvm_x86.c
>  create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h

[...]

> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h 
> b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e5dd386f6664
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ptp_kvm.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + *  Virtual PTP 1588 clock for use with KVM guests
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2019 ARM Ltd.

I think you should live the original copyright assignment here.
This really isn't anything new.

> + *  All Rights Reserved
> + */
> +
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_init(void);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_clock(struct timespec64 *ts);
> +int kvm_arch_ptp_get_crosststamp(unsigned long *cycle,
> +		struct timespec64 *tspec, void *cs);

Why is this include file in asm-generic? This isn't a kernel-wide API.

I think it should be sitting in drivers/ptp, as it is only shared 
between
the generic and arch-specific stuff.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-25 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-25 10:44 [RFC PATCH v8 0/7] Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:44 ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:44 ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH v8 1/8] arm/arm64: smccc/psci: add arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:44   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:44   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 2/8] psci: let arm_smccc_1_1_invoke available by modules Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 3/8] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm modules to make it arch-independent Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 15:47   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-11-25 15:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-25 15:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-11-26  8:30     ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-26  8:30       ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-26  8:30       ` Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China)
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 4/8] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 5/8] clocksource: Add clocksource id for arm arch counter Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 6/8] psci: Add hvc call service for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 7/8] ptp: arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm64 Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH v8 8/8] kvm: arm64: Add capability check extension for ptp_kvm Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu
2019-11-25 10:45   ` Jianyong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a13a4f9554f36a46781308358fc63519@www.loen.fr \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kaly.xin@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.