From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword-matching
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:08:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3959ab9a9d44444c06ffd0f390cf95dc6bc7f6e.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFhGd8o8ihYeML6WpiE1-=eeXC+k1yzSEdA-WJXjwB-f9VcHoA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:03 +0900, Justin Stitt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:46 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 04:23 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> > > Add the "D:" type which behaves the same as "K:" but will only match
> > > content present in a patch file.
[]
> > > My opinion: Nack.
> >
> > I think something like this would be better
> > as it avoids duplication of K and D content.
>
> If I understand correctly, this puts the onus on the get_maintainer users
> to select the right argument whereas adding "D:", albeit with some
> duplicate code, allows maintainers themselves to decide in exactly
> which context they receive mail.
Maybe, but I doubt it'll be significantly different.
> This could all be a moot point, though, as I believe Konstantin
> is trying to separate out the whole idea of a patch-sender needing
> to specify the recipients of a patch.
As I understand it, by using get_maintainer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 4:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword matching Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword-matching Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:46 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 5:03 ` Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 5:08 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2023-09-28 19:12 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-09-28 4:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: migrate some K to D Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 4:49 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 5:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] get_maintainer: add patch-only keyword matching Joe Perches
2023-09-28 5:31 ` Justin Stitt
2023-09-28 6:09 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-28 15:52 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-09-29 2:07 ` Justin Stitt
2023-09-29 2:50 ` Joe Perches
2023-09-29 3:07 ` Justin Stitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3959ab9a9d44444c06ffd0f390cf95dc6bc7f6e.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.