From: Yogesh Lal <ylal@codeaurora.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org,
neeraju@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: Use unbound workqueue for deferred probes
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:03:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a40db2a2-f58a-aaec-6976-977d4b9f9e0e@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YDZKCk+it/7RpgUJ@kroah.com>
Hi Greg,
On 2/24/2021 6:13 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:25:49PM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote:
>> Queue deferred driver probes on unbounded workqueue, to allow
>> scheduler better manage scheduling of long running probes.
>
> Really? What does this change and help? What is the visable affect of
> this patch? What problem does it solve?
>
We observed boot up improvement (~400 msec) when the deferred probe work
is made unbound. This is due to scheduler moving the worker running
deferred probe work to big CPUs. without this change, we see the worker
is running on LITTLE CPU due to affinity.
Please let us now if there are any concerns/restrictions that deferred
probe work should run only on pinned kworkers. Since this work runs
deferred probe of several devices , the locality may not be that important
Thanks
Yogesh Lal
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-25 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-24 11:55 [PATCH] driver core: Use unbound workqueue for deferred probes Yogesh Lal
2021-02-24 12:43 ` Greg KH
2021-02-25 10:33 ` Yogesh Lal [this message]
2021-02-25 11:44 ` Greg KH
2021-03-15 10:45 ` Yogesh Lal
2021-03-23 9:50 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a40db2a2-f58a-aaec-6976-977d4b9f9e0e@codeaurora.org \
--to=ylal@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.