All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "kent.overstreet@linux.dev" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"hca@linux.ibm.com" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"chenhuacai@kernel.org" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"tsbogend@alpha.franken.de" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"dinguyen@kernel.org" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:13:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjcr26YskTm+0EF@moria.home.lan>

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 14:00 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:54:27PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > It is just a local flush, but I wonder how much text_poke()ing is
> > too
> > much. A lot of the are even inside loops. Can't it do the batch
> > version
> > at least?
> > 
> > The other thing, and maybe this is in paranoia category, but it's
> > probably at least worth noting. Before the modules were not made
> > executable until all of the code was finalized. Now they are made
> > executable in an intermediate state and then patched later. It
> > might
> > weaken the CFI stuff, but also it just kind of seems a bit
> > unbounded
> > for dealing with executable code.
> 
> I believe bpf starts out by initializing new executable memory with
> illegal opcodes, maybe we should steal that and make it standard.

I was thinking of modules which have a ton of alternatives, errata
fixes, etc applied to them after the initial sections are written to
the to-be-executable mapping. I thought this had zeroed pages to start,
which seems ok.

> 
> > Preparing the modules in a separate RW mapping, and then
> > text_poke()ing
> > the whole thing in when you are done would resolve both of these.
> 
> text_poke() _does_ create a separate RW mapping.

Sorry, I meant a separate RW allocation.

> 
> The thing that sucks about text_poke() is that it always does a full
> TLB
> flush, and AFAICT that's not remotely needed. What it really wants to
> be
> doing is conceptually just
> 
> kmap_local()
> mempcy()
> kunmap_loca()
> flush_icache();
> 
> ...except that kmap_local() won't actually create a new mapping on
> non-highmem architectures, so text_poke() open codes it.

Text poke creates only a local CPU RW mapping. It's more secure because
other threads can't write to it. It also only needs to flush the local
core when it's done since it's not using a shared MM. It used to use
the fixmap, which is similar to what you are describing I think.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "kent.overstreet@linux.dev" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"hca@linux.ibm.com" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"chenhuacai@kernel.org" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"tsbogend@alpha.franken.de" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"dinguyen@kernel.org" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:13:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjcr26YskTm+0EF@moria.home.lan>

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 14:00 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:54:27PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > It is just a local flush, but I wonder how much text_poke()ing is
> > too
> > much. A lot of the are even inside loops. Can't it do the batch
> > version
> > at least?
> > 
> > The other thing, and maybe this is in paranoia category, but it's
> > probably at least worth noting. Before the modules were not made
> > executable until all of the code was finalized. Now they are made
> > executable in an intermediate state and then patched later. It
> > might
> > weaken the CFI stuff, but also it just kind of seems a bit
> > unbounded
> > for dealing with executable code.
> 
> I believe bpf starts out by initializing new executable memory with
> illegal opcodes, maybe we should steal that and make it standard.

I was thinking of modules which have a ton of alternatives, errata
fixes, etc applied to them after the initial sections are written to
the to-be-executable mapping. I thought this had zeroed pages to start,
which seems ok.

> 
> > Preparing the modules in a separate RW mapping, and then
> > text_poke()ing
> > the whole thing in when you are done would resolve both of these.
> 
> text_poke() _does_ create a separate RW mapping.

Sorry, I meant a separate RW allocation.

> 
> The thing that sucks about text_poke() is that it always does a full
> TLB
> flush, and AFAICT that's not remotely needed. What it really wants to
> be
> doing is conceptually just
> 
> kmap_local()
> mempcy()
> kunmap_loca()
> flush_icache();
> 
> ...except that kmap_local() won't actually create a new mapping on
> non-highmem architectures, so text_poke() open codes it.

Text poke creates only a local CPU RW mapping. It's more secure because
other threads can't write to it. It also only needs to flush the local
core when it's done since it's not using a shared MM. It used to use
the fixmap, which is similar to what you are describing I think.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "kent.overstreet@linux.dev" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"hca@linux.ibm.com" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"chenhuacai@kernel.org" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"tsbogend@alpha.franken.de" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"mpe@ellerman.id.au" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"dinguyen@kernel.org" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:13:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjcr26YskTm+0EF@moria.home.lan>

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 14:00 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:54:27PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > It is just a local flush, but I wonder how much text_poke()ing is
> > too
> > much. A lot of the are even inside loops. Can't it do the batch
> > version
> > at least?
> > 
> > The other thing, and maybe this is in paranoia category, but it's
> > probably at least worth noting. Before the modules were not made
> > executable until all of the code was finalized. Now they are made
> > executable in an intermediate state and then patched later. It
> > might
> > weaken the CFI stuff, but also it just kind of seems a bit
> > unbounded
> > for dealing with executable code.
> 
> I believe bpf starts out by initializing new executable memory with
> illegal opcodes, maybe we should steal that and make it standard.

I was thinking of modules which have a ton of alternatives, errata
fixes, etc applied to them after the initial sections are written to
the to-be-executable mapping. I thought this had zeroed pages to start,
which seems ok.

> 
> > Preparing the modules in a separate RW mapping, and then
> > text_poke()ing
> > the whole thing in when you are done would resolve both of these.
> 
> text_poke() _does_ create a separate RW mapping.

Sorry, I meant a separate RW allocation.

> 
> The thing that sucks about text_poke() is that it always does a full
> TLB
> flush, and AFAICT that's not remotely needed. What it really wants to
> be
> doing is conceptually just
> 
> kmap_local()
> mempcy()
> kunmap_loca()
> flush_icache();
> 
> ...except that kmap_local() won't actually create a new mapping on
> non-highmem architectures, so text_poke() open codes it.

Text poke creates only a local CPU RW mapping. It's more secure because
other threads can't write to it. It also only needs to flush the local
core when it's done since it's not using a shared MM. It used to use
the fixmap, which is similar to what you are describing I think.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "kent.overstreet@linux.dev" <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"song@kernel.org" <song@kernel.org>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
	"chenhuacai@kernel.org" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	"linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"hca@linux.ibm.com" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"loongarch@lists.linux.dev" <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.o rg>,
	"tsbogend@alpha.franken.de" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dinguyen@kernel.org" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	"palmer@dabbelt.com" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"rppt@kernel.org" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 18:13:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHjcr26YskTm+0EF@moria.home.lan>

On Thu, 2023-06-01 at 14:00 -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 04:54:27PM +0000, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> > It is just a local flush, but I wonder how much text_poke()ing is
> > too
> > much. A lot of the are even inside loops. Can't it do the batch
> > version
> > at least?
> > 
> > The other thing, and maybe this is in paranoia category, but it's
> > probably at least worth noting. Before the modules were not made
> > executable until all of the code was finalized. Now they are made
> > executable in an intermediate state and then patched later. It
> > might
> > weaken the CFI stuff, but also it just kind of seems a bit
> > unbounded
> > for dealing with executable code.
> 
> I believe bpf starts out by initializing new executable memory with
> illegal opcodes, maybe we should steal that and make it standard.

I was thinking of modules which have a ton of alternatives, errata
fixes, etc applied to them after the initial sections are written to
the to-be-executable mapping. I thought this had zeroed pages to start,
which seems ok.

> 
> > Preparing the modules in a separate RW mapping, and then
> > text_poke()ing
> > the whole thing in when you are done would resolve both of these.
> 
> text_poke() _does_ create a separate RW mapping.

Sorry, I meant a separate RW allocation.

> 
> The thing that sucks about text_poke() is that it always does a full
> TLB
> flush, and AFAICT that's not remotely needed. What it really wants to
> be
> doing is conceptually just
> 
> kmap_local()
> mempcy()
> kunmap_loca()
> flush_icache();
> 
> ...except that kmap_local() won't actually create a new mapping on
> non-highmem architectures, so text_poke() open codes it.

Text poke creates only a local CPU RW mapping. It's more secure because
other threads can't write to it. It also only needs to flush the local
core when it's done since it's not using a shared MM. It used to use
the fixmap, which is similar to what you are describing I think.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-01 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 220+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01 10:12 [PATCH 00/13] mm: jit/text allocator Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 01/13] nios2: define virtual address space for modules Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 22:16   ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16     ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16     ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-13 22:16     ` Dinh Nguyen
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 02/13] mm: introduce jit_text_alloc() and use it instead of module_alloc() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 03/13] mm/jitalloc, arch: convert simple overrides of module_alloc to jitalloc Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 04/13] mm/jitalloc, arch: convert remaining " Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 22:35   ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:35     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 05/13] module, jitalloc: drop module_alloc Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 06/13] mm/jitalloc: introduce jit_data_alloc() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86/ftrace: enable dynamic ftrace without CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 08/13] arch: make jitalloc setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 09/13] kprobes: remove dependcy on CONFIG_MODULES Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 10/13] modules, jitalloc: prepare to allocate executable memory as ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 11/13] ftrace: Add swap_func to ftrace_process_locs() Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble memory as ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 10:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-01 11:07     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 11:07       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-02  0:02       ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:02         ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:02         ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:02         ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 17:52     ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 17:52       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 17:52       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 17:52       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 16:54   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 16:54     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:00     ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:00       ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:13       ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2023-06-01 18:13         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:13         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:13         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 18:38         ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:38           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 20:50           ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 20:50             ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-01 23:54             ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54               ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54               ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-01 23:54               ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05  2:52               ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05  2:52                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05  2:52                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05  2:52                 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-06-05  8:11                 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  8:11                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  8:11                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  8:11                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 16:10                   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 16:10                     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 20:42                     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42                       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42                       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 20:42                       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 21:01                       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01                         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01                         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:01                         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2023-06-05 21:11                     ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11                       ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11                       ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-05 21:11                       ` Nadav Amit
2023-06-04 21:47             ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:47               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 22:49   ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 22:49     ` Song Liu
2023-06-01 10:12 ` [PATCH 13/13] x86/jitalloc: make memory allocated for code ROX Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 10:12   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-01 16:12 ` [PATCH 00/13] mm: jit/text allocator Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12   ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12   ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 16:12   ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 18:14   ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-01 18:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-02  9:35     ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02  9:35       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02  9:35       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02  9:35       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-02 18:20       ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20         ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20         ` Song Liu
2023-06-02 18:20         ` Song Liu
2023-06-03 21:11         ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11           ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11           ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-03 21:11           ` Puranjay Mohan
2023-06-04 18:02         ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 18:02           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:22           ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22             ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22             ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:22             ` Song Liu
2023-06-04 21:40             ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-04 21:40               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05  4:05               ` Song Liu
2023-06-05  4:05                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05  4:05                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05  4:05                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-05  9:20       ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  9:20         ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  9:20         ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05  9:20         ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 10:09         ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09           ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09           ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-05 10:09           ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-06 10:16           ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 10:16             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-06 18:21           ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21             ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21             ` Song Liu
2023-06-06 18:21             ` Song Liu
2023-06-08 18:41             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41               ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41               ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-08 18:41               ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-09 17:02               ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-09 17:02                 ` Song Liu
2023-06-12 21:34                 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-12 21:34                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 18:56               ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56                 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56                 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 18:56                 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-13 21:09                 ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-13 21:09                   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20  8:53           ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20  8:53             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20  8:53             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-07-20  8:53             ` Mike Rapoport
2023-06-05 21:13         ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-05 21:13           ` Kent Overstreet
2023-06-02  0:36 ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:36   ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:36   ` Song Liu
2023-06-02  0:36   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a51c041b61e2916d2b91c990349aabc6cb9836aa.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.