All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com,
	Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:50:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a59d23b9-961f-4129-7491-59f88923366a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_zxq=SX0OdXV77HyFytJc6aCMbYuS6KZAR_JoQeGZ26Sw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021/9/8 2:12, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:45 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/9/4 12:40, Daeho Jeong wrote:
>>>> As a per curseg field.
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe, we run into the same race condition issue you told before for
>>>>> fragment_remained_chunk.
>>>>> Could you clarify this more?
>>>>
>>>> e.g.
>>>>
>>>> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK
>>>> fragment_chunk_size = 384
>>>> fragment_hole_size = 384
>>>>
>>>> When creating hole:
>>>>
>>>> - f2fs_allocate_data_block
>>>>     - __refresh_next_blkoff
>>>>       chunk locates in [0, 383] of current segment
>>>>       seg->next_blkoff = 384
>>>>       sbi->fragment_remained_chunk = 0
>>>>       then we will reset sbi->fragment_remained_chunk to 384
>>>>       and move seg->next_blkoff forward to 768 (384 + 384)
>>>>     - __has_curseg_space() returns false
>>>>     - allocate_segment() allocates new current segment
>>>>
>>>> So, for such case that hole may cross two segments, hole size may be truncated
>>>> to left size of previous segment.
>>>
>>> First, sbi->fragment_remained_chunk should be seg->fragment_remained_chunk.
>>
>> Oh, correct.
>>
>>> I understand what you mean, so you mean we need to take the leftover
>>> "hole" size over to the next segment?
>>> In the example, the leftover hole size will be (384 - (512-384)). Do
>>> you want to take this over to the next segment?
>>
>> Yes, the left 256 block-sized hole should be created before next chunk
>> in next opened segment.
>>
> 
> Chao,
> 
> Do you have any decent idea to pass the left hole size to the next
> segment which will be allocated?

Daeho,

I guess we can record left hole size in seg->fragment_remained_hole.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 07:50:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a59d23b9-961f-4129-7491-59f88923366a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_zxq=SX0OdXV77HyFytJc6aCMbYuS6KZAR_JoQeGZ26Sw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021/9/8 2:12, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:45 PM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/9/4 12:40, Daeho Jeong wrote:
>>>> As a per curseg field.
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe, we run into the same race condition issue you told before for
>>>>> fragment_remained_chunk.
>>>>> Could you clarify this more?
>>>>
>>>> e.g.
>>>>
>>>> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).fs_mode = FS_MODE_FRAGMENT_FIXED_BLK
>>>> fragment_chunk_size = 384
>>>> fragment_hole_size = 384
>>>>
>>>> When creating hole:
>>>>
>>>> - f2fs_allocate_data_block
>>>>     - __refresh_next_blkoff
>>>>       chunk locates in [0, 383] of current segment
>>>>       seg->next_blkoff = 384
>>>>       sbi->fragment_remained_chunk = 0
>>>>       then we will reset sbi->fragment_remained_chunk to 384
>>>>       and move seg->next_blkoff forward to 768 (384 + 384)
>>>>     - __has_curseg_space() returns false
>>>>     - allocate_segment() allocates new current segment
>>>>
>>>> So, for such case that hole may cross two segments, hole size may be truncated
>>>> to left size of previous segment.
>>>
>>> First, sbi->fragment_remained_chunk should be seg->fragment_remained_chunk.
>>
>> Oh, correct.
>>
>>> I understand what you mean, so you mean we need to take the leftover
>>> "hole" size over to the next segment?
>>> In the example, the leftover hole size will be (384 - (512-384)). Do
>>> you want to take this over to the next segment?
>>
>> Yes, the left 256 block-sized hole should be created before next chunk
>> in next opened segment.
>>
> 
> Chao,
> 
> Do you have any decent idea to pass the left hole size to the next
> segment which will be allocated?

Daeho,

I guess we can record left hole size in seg->fragment_remained_hole.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 17:24 [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode mount option Daeho Jeong
2021-09-02 17:24 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2021-09-02 23:57 ` Chao Yu
2021-09-02 23:57   ` Chao Yu
2021-09-03 20:33   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-03 20:33     ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-04  3:33     ` Chao Yu
2021-09-04  3:33       ` Chao Yu
2021-09-04  4:40       ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-04  4:40         ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-04  6:45         ` Chao Yu
2021-09-04  6:45           ` Chao Yu
2021-09-07 18:12           ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-07 18:12             ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-09 23:50             ` Chao Yu [this message]
2021-09-09 23:50               ` Chao Yu
2021-09-10 14:34               ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-10 14:34                 ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-10 15:24                 ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-10 15:24                   ` Daeho Jeong
2021-09-11 10:42                   ` Chao Yu
2021-09-11 10:42                     ` Chao Yu
2021-09-10 23:13 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-10 23:13   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-11 23:45   ` Chao Yu
2021-09-11 23:45     ` Chao Yu
2021-09-20 22:57     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-20 22:57       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2021-09-22 15:23       ` Chao Yu
2021-09-22 15:23         ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a59d23b9-961f-4129-7491-59f88923366a@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.