[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.

On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
License: GPL2+
(Alex used this in some presentations.)

Source: https://gist.github.com/xypron/a923ad8cca83e648fc91716f2f29beed
License: GPL2+
(The image is already used in U-Boot:
setenv efi_selftest block image transfer
bootefi selftest
)

Looking forward to your further suggestions.

Best regards

Heinrich

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Marek Vasut]

On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
> 
> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
> 
> Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> License: GPL2+
> (Alex used this in some presentations.)

Yellow submarine, nice.

Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve the
contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray background
with a light blue one would do.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Alexander Graf]

> Am 01.05.2018 um 04:09 schrieb Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>:
> 
>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>> 
>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>> 
>> Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>> License: GPL2+
>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> 
> Yellow submarine, nice.

Glad you like it :).

> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve the
> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray background
> with a light blue one would do.

I actually removed the background altogether in my presentations which played out quite nicely.


Alex

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Alexander Graf]

On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>
>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>
>> Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>> License: GPL2+
>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> 
> Yellow submarine, nice.
> 
> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve the
> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray background
> with a light blue one would do.

How about this?

  http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg


Alex

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>
>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>
>>> Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>> License: GPL2+
>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>
>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>
>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve the
>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray background
>> with a light blue one would do.
> 
> How about this?
> 
>   http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg

Lacks the teal.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Alexander Graf]

On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>
>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>
>>>> Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve the
>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray background
>>> with a light blue one would do.
>> How about this?
>>
>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
> Lacks the teal.


I don't want teal :)


Alex

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>
>>>>> Source:
>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>> the
>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>> background
>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>> How about this?
>>>
>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>> Lacks the teal.
> 
> 
> I don't want teal :)

Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.

And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
just the two of us discussing it now :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:18:48AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Source:
> >>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> >>>>> License: GPL2+
> >>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> >>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
> >>>> the
> >>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
> >>>> background
> >>>> with a light blue one would do.
> >>> How about this?
> >>>
> >>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
> >> Lacks the teal.
> > 
> > 
> > I don't want teal :)
> 
> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
> 
> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
> just the two of us discussing it now :)

Heinrich has also chimed in.  But, I'm going to make more noise with the
v2018.05 release and give people a chance to chime in again there.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180504/0da663c2/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

Marek's eyes hurt from my first suggestions's colors. So here is
something more decent:

https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/u-boot-3.svg

Source: https://gist.github.com/xypron/a923ad8cca83e648fc91716f2f29beed
License: GPL2+ (or CC-BY-SA if preferred by the U-Boot project)

Regards

Heinrich

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>> the
>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>> background
>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>> How about this?
>>>>
>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>> Lacks the teal.
>>
>>
>> I don't want teal :)
> 
> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
> 
> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
> just the two of us discussing it now :)
> Find Marek's darling appended
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
Type: image/svg+xml
Size: 3297 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180506/b8408dcc/attachment.svg>

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Alexander Graf]

On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>> background
>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>
>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't want teal :)
>>
>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>
>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
> Find Marek's darling appended

I tend to agree that it looks nice :).

It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.


Alex

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:

> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Source:
> >>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> >>>>>>> License: GPL2+
> >>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> >>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
> >>>>>> background
> >>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
> >>>>> How about this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
> >>>> Lacks the teal.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I don't want teal :)
> >>
> >> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
> >>
> >> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
> >> just the two of us discussing it now :)
> > Find Marek's darling appended

It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.

> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
> 
> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.

We can worry about that later.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180506/0c3c31aa/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Simon Glass]

Hi,

On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> > On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> >>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Source:
>> >>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>> >>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>> >>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>> >>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>> >>>>>> background
>> >>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>> >>>>> How about this?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>> >>>> Lacks the teal.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I don't want teal :)
>> >>
>> >> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>> >>
>> >> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>> >> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>> > Find Marek's darling appended
>
> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>
>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>
>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>
> We can worry about that later.

I think the logo as here is fine:

https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg

What do you think about putting the word U-Boot inside it? Something like this:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HsiXbZhtn8URhbdAeiW802t5Y0Tyqnuv

Regards,
Simon

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Marek Vasut]

On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>
>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>
>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>
>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>
>> We can worry about that later.
> 
> I think the logo as here is fine:
> 
> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg

Yes, his one is nice. The one at osfc website is not.

> What do you think about putting the word U-Boot inside it? Something like this:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HsiXbZhtn8URhbdAeiW802t5Y0Tyqnuv

I think the rendering fell apart, make a PNG or something please.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>
>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>
>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>
>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>
>> We can worry about that later.
> 
> I think the logo as here is fine:
> 
> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg

This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
creative commons license?

> 
> What do you think about putting the word U-Boot inside it? Something like this:
> 
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HsiXbZhtn8URhbdAeiW802t5Y0Tyqnuv

I have collected all suggestions here:

https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/logo.html

Best regards

Heinrich

> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Minkyu Kang]

Hi,

2018년 6월 10일 (일) 05:22, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>님이 작성:

> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Source:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> >>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
> >>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> >>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to
> improve
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
> >>>>>>>>> background
> >>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
> >>>>>>>> How about this?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
> >>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't want teal :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly
> it's
> >>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
> >>>> Find Marek's darling appended
> >>
> >> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
> >> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
> >> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
> >> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
> >> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
> >>
> >>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
> >>>
> >>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
> >>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
> >>
> >> We can worry about that later.
> >
> > I think the logo as here is fine:
> >
> >
> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
>
> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
> creative commons license?
>
> >
> > What do you think about putting the word U-Boot inside it? Something
> like this:
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HsiXbZhtn8URhbdAeiW802t5Y0Tyqnuv
>
> I have collected all suggestions here:
>
> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/logo.html
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> >
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot


I like this one! :)

Suggested by: Alexander Graf
Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg

Thanks,
Minkyu Kang.

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Tom Rini]

On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Source:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> >>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
> >>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
> >>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
> >>>>>>>>> background
> >>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
> >>>>>>>> How about this?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
> >>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't want teal :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
> >>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
> >>>> Find Marek's darling appended
> >>
> >> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
> >> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
> >> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
> >> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
> >> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
> >>
> >>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
> >>>
> >>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
> >>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
> >>
> >> We can worry about that later.
> > 
> > I think the logo as here is fine:
> > 
> > https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
> 
> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
> creative commons license?

So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made
licenses that are still "open source" but for other things.  One of the
uses of a logo is to be printed.  What on earth does GPLv2 (or later)
compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt?  That's not the
(usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing
like this.  This is why currently projects use one of the Creative
Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc.

And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you
can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other
direction.  And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use
our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an
image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd
image.

If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's not
the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to
re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180611/8a515c77/attachment.sig>

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>>>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>>>
>>>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>>>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
>>>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
>>>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>>>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>>>
>>>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>>>
>>>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>>>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>>>
>>>> We can worry about that later.
>>>
>>> I think the logo as here is fine:
>>>
>>> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
>>
>> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
>> creative commons license?
> 
> So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made
> licenses that are still "open source" but for other things.  One of the
> uses of a logo is to be printed.  What on earth does GPLv2 (or later)
> compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt?  That's not the
> (usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing
> like this.  This is why currently projects use one of the Creative
> Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc.
> 
> And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you
> can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other
> direction.  And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use
> our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an
> image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd
> image.
> 
> If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's not
> the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to
> re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route.  Thanks!
> 

I have raised that question on:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CFCF#Circle-icons-submarine.svg

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Simon Glass]

Hi Heinrich,

On 11 June 2018 at 09:54, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>>>>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>>>>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
>>>>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
>>>>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>>>>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>>>>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>>>>
>>>>> We can worry about that later.
>>>>
>>>> I think the logo as here is fine:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
>>>
>>> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
>>> creative commons license?
>>
>> So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made
>> licenses that are still "open source" but for other things.  One of the
>> uses of a logo is to be printed.  What on earth does GPLv2 (or later)
>> compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt?  That's not the
>> (usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing
>> like this.  This is why currently projects use one of the Creative
>> Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc.
>>
>> And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you
>> can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other
>> direction.  And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use
>> our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an
>> image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd
>> image.
>>
>> If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's not
>> the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to
>> re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route.  Thanks!
>>
>
> I have raised that question on:
>
> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CFCF#Circle-icons-submarine.svg

It looks like the answer was not what you needed, or perhaps I am
reading it incorrectly?

Here are two versions, both with 'U-Boot' text inside the logo. I
think this is important since otherwise the logo could be for
anything.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TdX0JS_Zr6ZGtUt6F-6y8rUv2Hq2QlOp

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UxMY67es8OGIDMST-3G0Pc0aTjbasxTY

Regards,
Simon

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Stefan Roese]

On 24.06.2018 20:07, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
> 
> On 11 June 2018 at 09:54, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions where made:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange to improve
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>     http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since clearly it's
>>>>>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>>>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>>>>>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask because the
>>>>>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we could dual
>>>>>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>>>>>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors in the
>>>>>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can worry about that later.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the logo as here is fine:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
>>>>
>>>> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
>>>> creative commons license?
>>>
>>> So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made
>>> licenses that are still "open source" but for other things.  One of the
>>> uses of a logo is to be printed.  What on earth does GPLv2 (or later)
>>> compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt?  That's not the
>>> (usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing
>>> like this.  This is why currently projects use one of the Creative
>>> Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc.
>>>
>>> And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you
>>> can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other
>>> direction.  And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use
>>> our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an
>>> image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd
>>> image.
>>>
>>> If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's not
>>> the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to
>>> re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route.  Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> I have raised that question on:
>>
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CFCF#Circle-icons-submarine.svg
> 
> It looks like the answer was not what you needed, or perhaps I am
> reading it incorrectly?
> 
> Here are two versions, both with 'U-Boot' text inside the logo. I
> think this is important since otherwise the logo could be for
> anything.

Yes, i agree. The text should be added.

> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TdX0JS_Zr6ZGtUt6F-6y8rUv2Hq2QlOp
> 
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UxMY67es8OGIDMST-3G0Pc0aTjbasxTY

I'm in favor of the 2nd version with the complete text.

Thanks,
Stefan

[U-Boot] Logo for U-Boot

[Marek Vasut]

On 06/25/2018 07:52 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 24.06.2018 20:07, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Heinrich,
>>
>> On 11 June 2018 at 09:54, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2018 03:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:21:53PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>> On 06/09/2018 07:34 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6 May 2018 at 12:31, Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:49:42PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 06.05.18 18:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 11:18 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 08:46 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/04/2018 01:04 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/03/2018 11:57 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 01.05.18 04:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/30/2018 08:22 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> U-Boot has currently no logo that we can use in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presentations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the U-Boot IRC channel the following propositions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where made:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> License: GPL2+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Alex used this in some presentations.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yellow submarine, nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should make it a bit more toward teal and orange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to improve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrast ? Although, maybe just replacing the depressive gray
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> background
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a light blue one would do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>     http://csgraf.de/tmp2/uboot.svg
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lacks the teal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want teal :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Without teal, the contrast of the image isn't good enough.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And I think you might want to check with more people, since
>>>>>>>>>> clearly it's
>>>>>>>>>> just the two of us discussing it now :)
>>>>>>>>> Find Marek's darling appended
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a little hard to quote things inline like this.  But, did you
>>>>>>> create your own image inspired by the wikimedia one?  I ask
>>>>>>> because the
>>>>>>> wikimedia one is GPLv2 or later, but an original one that we
>>>>>>> could dual
>>>>>>> license (for both a new framebuffer logo, and for printed materials,
>>>>>>> etc, where a CC license works better) would be good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tend to agree that it looks nice :).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It may mean we need a new web design too though, as the colors
>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>> logo probably don't work terribly well with the current blue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We can worry about that later.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the logo as here is fine:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.xypron.de/projects/u-boot/images/Circle-icons-submarine-orange-teal.svg
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This logo was GPLv2+. Tom, didn't you say we needed something with
>>>>> creative commons license?
>>>>
>>>> So, while I'm Not A Lawyer(TM), there is a reason lawyers have made
>>>> licenses that are still "open source" but for other things.  One of the
>>>> uses of a logo is to be printed.  What on earth does GPLv2 (or later)
>>>> compliance look like for a brochure or a t-shirt?  That's not the
>>>> (usual) spirit behind why you would put a license like that on a thing
>>>> like this.  This is why currently projects use one of the Creative
>>>> Commons 4.0 licenses for images, hardware design, etc.
>>>>
>>>> And further pushing my "not a lawyer", it's generally accepted that you
>>>> can go from CC-4.0 to GPLv3 (or later), you can't go the other
>>>> direction.  And I'd also really rather not put people that want to use
>>>> our logo in the position of worrying about what GPLv2 compliance on an
>>>> image looks like (as it's not clear), I'm strongly in favor of a CC'd
>>>> image.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone can contact the actual author of the wikimedia image (it's
>>>> not
>>>> the person that uploaded it, I dug that far) and have them agree to
>>>> re-license as CC, I'd be happy to go that route.  Thanks!
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have raised that question on:
>>>
>>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CFCF#Circle-icons-submarine.svg
>>>
>>
>> It looks like the answer was not what you needed, or perhaps I am
>> reading it incorrectly?
>>
>> Here are two versions, both with 'U-Boot' text inside the logo. I
>> think this is important since otherwise the logo could be for
>> anything.
> 
> Yes, i agree. The text should be added.
> 
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1TdX0JS_Zr6ZGtUt6F-6y8rUv2Hq2QlOp
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UxMY67es8OGIDMST-3G0Pc0aTjbasxTY
> 
> I'm in favor of the 2nd version with the complete text.

I vote for the first version or even version without text. Icons with
text are so 90ies :)

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut