From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> To: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, LKP <lkp@01.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x86/unwind: Disable unwinder warnings on 32-bit Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 20:20:05 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a69658760800bf281e6353248c23e0fa0acf5230.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> x86-32 doesn't have stack validation, so in most cases it doesn't make sense to warn about bad frame pointers. Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c index 81aca077fbb6..3dc26f95d46e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c @@ -355,6 +355,13 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state) state->regs->sp < (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(state->task)) goto the_end; + /* + * There are some known frame pointer issues on 32-bit. Disable + * unwinder warnings on 32-bit until it gets objtool support. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) + goto the_end; + if (state->regs) { printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n", -- 2.13.6
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: [PATCH 4/4] x86/unwind: Disable unwinder warnings on 32-bit Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 20:20:05 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a69658760800bf281e6353248c23e0fa0acf5230.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <cover.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1024 bytes --] x86-32 doesn't have stack validation, so in most cases it doesn't make sense to warn about bad frame pointers. Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c index 81aca077fbb6..3dc26f95d46e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c @@ -355,6 +355,13 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state) state->regs->sp < (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(state->task)) goto the_end; + /* + * There are some known frame pointer issues on 32-bit. Disable + * unwinder warnings on 32-bit until it gets objtool support. + */ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) + goto the_end; + if (state->regs) { printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING "WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n", -- 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 1:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-10-10 1:20 [PATCH 0/4] x86/unwind: 32-bit unwinder fixes Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/unwind: Fix dereference of untrusted pointer Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 14:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/unwind: Use MSB for frame pointer encoding on 32-bit Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 14:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/unwind: Align stack pointer in unwinder dump Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 14:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 1:20 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message] 2017-10-10 1:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/unwind: Disable unwinder warnings on 32-bit Josh Poimboeuf 2017-10-10 14:56 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=a69658760800bf281e6353248c23e0fa0acf5230.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com \ --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \ --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \ --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkp@01.org \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.