Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: Drop "ti-" prefix from module name

From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: Drop "ti-" prefix from module name
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 13:54:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a73006d5-265a-ff7a-2171-409f9300a168@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83b36ce2-6b54-b5ee-6ad3-1f90d26f5e52@lechnology.com>

On 14/01/17 18:07, David Lechner wrote:
> On 01/14/2017 06:49 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On 11/01/17 17:52, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This drops the "ti-" prefix from the module name. It makes the module name
>>> consistent with other iio ti-ads* drivers and it makes the driver work
>>> with device tree (the spi subsystem drops the "ti," prefix when matching
>>> compatible strings from device tree).
>>>
>>> Tested working on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 with the following device tree node:
>>>
>>>     adc@3 {
>>>         compatible = "ti,ads7957";
>>>         reg = <3>;
>>>         #io-channel-cells = <1>;
>>>         spi-max-frequency = <10000000>;
>>>         vref-supply = <&adc_ref>;
>>>     };
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
>> What worries me here is that we might break existing setups.  I agree
>> we should have gotten this 'right' in the first place, but can we fix
>> it now.  Not so sure. We'd be better off perhaps adding an of_device_id
>> table with the write entries for device tree.
> 

> As far as I can tell, this driver only exists in your testing branch.
> Does that really mean that it is too late to get it right?
Gah!  I have a memory like a goldfish.

Excellent point - we can and should do this asap.
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

>>> ---
>>>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
>>> index 0330361..b587fa6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
>>> @@ -459,25 +459,25 @@ static int ti_ads7950_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static const struct spi_device_id ti_ads7950_id[] = {
>>> -    {"ti-ads7950", TI_ADS7950},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7951", TI_ADS7951},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7952", TI_ADS7952},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7953", TI_ADS7953},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7954", TI_ADS7954},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7955", TI_ADS7955},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7956", TI_ADS7956},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7957", TI_ADS7957},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7958", TI_ADS7958},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7959", TI_ADS7959},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7960", TI_ADS7960},
>>> -    {"ti-ads7961", TI_ADS7961},
>>> +    { "ads7950", TI_ADS7950 },
>>> +    { "ads7951", TI_ADS7951 },
>>> +    { "ads7952", TI_ADS7952 },
>>> +    { "ads7953", TI_ADS7953 },
>>> +    { "ads7954", TI_ADS7954 },
>>> +    { "ads7955", TI_ADS7955 },
>>> +    { "ads7956", TI_ADS7956 },
>>> +    { "ads7957", TI_ADS7957 },
>>> +    { "ads7958", TI_ADS7958 },
>>> +    { "ads7959", TI_ADS7959 },
>>> +    { "ads7960", TI_ADS7960 },
>>> +    { "ads7961", TI_ADS7961 },
>>>      { }
>>>  };
>>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, ti_ads7950_id);
>>>
>>>  static struct spi_driver ti_ads7950_driver = {
>>>      .driver = {
>>> -        .name    = "ti-ads7950",
>>> +        .name    = "ads7950",
>>>      },
>>>      .probe        = ti_ads7950_probe,
>>>      .remove        = ti_ads7950_remove,
>>>
>>
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html