All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>, tony@atomide.com
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, nm@ti.com,
	lokeshvutla@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" DT property is optional
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:36:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa465bd9-b3d5-8d75-3e59-e86c2cd093cd@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210907113226.31876-9-rogerq@kernel.org>

On 07/09/2021 13:32, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Check for valid gpmc,device-width, nand-bus-width and bank-width
> at one place. Default to 8-bit width if none present.

I don't understand the message in the context of the patch. The title
says one property is optional - that's it. The message says you
consolidate checks. How is this related to the title?

The patch itself moves around checking of properties and reads
nand-bus-width *always*. It does not "check at one place" but rather
"check always". In the same time, the patch does not remove
gpmc,device-width check in other place.

All three elements - the title, message and patch - do different things.
What did you want to achieve here? Can you help in clarifying it?


Best regards,
Krzysztof


> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index f80c2ea39ca4..32d7c665f33c 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -2171,10 +2171,8 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> -		/* NAND specific setup */
> -		val = 8;
> -		of_property_read_u32(child, "nand-bus-width", &val);
> +	/* DT node can have "nand-bus-width" or "bank-width" or "gpmc,device-width" */
> +	if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "nand-bus-width", &val)) {
>  		switch (val) {
>  		case 8:
>  			gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_8BIT;
> @@ -2183,24 +2181,37 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  			gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_16BIT;
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOFn: invalid 'nand-bus-width'\n",
> -				child);
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'nand-bus-width':%d\n", child, val);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	} else if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "bank-width", &val)) {
> +		if (val != 1 && val != 2) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'bank-width':%d\n", child, val);
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = val;
> +	} else if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "gpmc,device-width", &val)) {
> +		if (val != 1 && val != 2) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'gpmc,device-width':%d\n", child, val);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = val;
> +	} else {
> +		/* default to 8-bit */
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_8BIT;
> +	}
>  
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> +		/* NAND specific setup */
>  		/* disable write protect */
>  		gpmc_configure(GPMC_CONFIG_WP, 0);
>  		gpmc_s.device_nand = true;
> -	} else {
> -		ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "bank-width",
> -					   &gpmc_s.device_width);
> -		if (ret < 0 && !gpmc_s.device_width) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -				"%pOF has no 'gpmc,device-width' property\n",
> -				child);
> -			goto err;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Reserve wait pin if it is required and valid */
> 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>, tony@atomide.com
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, nm@ti.com,
	lokeshvutla@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc, device-width" DT property is optional
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:36:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa465bd9-b3d5-8d75-3e59-e86c2cd093cd@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210907113226.31876-9-rogerq@kernel.org>

On 07/09/2021 13:32, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Check for valid gpmc,device-width, nand-bus-width and bank-width
> at one place. Default to 8-bit width if none present.

I don't understand the message in the context of the patch. The title
says one property is optional - that's it. The message says you
consolidate checks. How is this related to the title?

The patch itself moves around checking of properties and reads
nand-bus-width *always*. It does not "check at one place" but rather
"check always". In the same time, the patch does not remove
gpmc,device-width check in other place.

All three elements - the title, message and patch - do different things.
What did you want to achieve here? Can you help in clarifying it?


Best regards,
Krzysztof


> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index f80c2ea39ca4..32d7c665f33c 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -2171,10 +2171,8 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> -		/* NAND specific setup */
> -		val = 8;
> -		of_property_read_u32(child, "nand-bus-width", &val);
> +	/* DT node can have "nand-bus-width" or "bank-width" or "gpmc,device-width" */
> +	if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "nand-bus-width", &val)) {
>  		switch (val) {
>  		case 8:
>  			gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_8BIT;
> @@ -2183,24 +2181,37 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  			gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_16BIT;
>  			break;
>  		default:
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOFn: invalid 'nand-bus-width'\n",
> -				child);
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'nand-bus-width':%d\n", child, val);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	} else if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "bank-width", &val)) {
> +		if (val != 1 && val != 2) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'bank-width':%d\n", child, val);
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto err;
>  		}
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = val;
> +	} else if (!of_property_read_u32(child, "gpmc,device-width", &val)) {
> +		if (val != 1 && val != 2) {
> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +				"%pOFn: invalid 'gpmc,device-width':%d\n", child, val);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = val;
> +	} else {
> +		/* default to 8-bit */
> +		gpmc_s.device_width = GPMC_DEVWIDTH_8BIT;
> +	}
>  
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> +		/* NAND specific setup */
>  		/* disable write protect */
>  		gpmc_configure(GPMC_CONFIG_WP, 0);
>  		gpmc_s.device_nand = true;
> -	} else {
> -		ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "bank-width",
> -					   &gpmc_s.device_width);
> -		if (ret < 0 && !gpmc_s.device_width) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -				"%pOF has no 'gpmc,device-width' property\n",
> -				child);
> -			goto err;
> -		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Reserve wait pin if it is required and valid */
> 



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-07 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 11:32 [PATCH v3 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Convert to yaml Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti, gpmc: " Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: dts: omap: Fixup GPMC child nodes Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 12:44   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-07 12:44     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-15  8:53     ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-15  8:53       ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: mtd: Remove gpmc-nor.txt Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: net: Remove gpmc-eth.txt Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: Introduce ti,gpmc-child Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 4/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: Introduce ti, gpmc-child Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] dt-bindings: mtd: ti,gpmc-nand: Convert to yaml Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 14:03   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-07 14:03     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-07 15:27     ` Grygorii Strashko
2021-09-07 15:27       ` Grygorii Strashko
2021-09-07 16:35       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-07 16:35         ` Miquel Raynal
2021-09-07 16:57         ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 16:57           ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 22:24           ` Rob Herring
2021-09-07 22:24             ` Rob Herring
2021-09-08  6:55             ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-08  6:55               ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 17:01   ` Rob Herring
2021-09-07 17:01     ` Rob Herring
2021-09-08 11:14     ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-08 11:14       ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-08 12:46       ` Rob Herring
2021-09-08 12:46         ` Rob Herring
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] dt-bindings: mtd: ti,gpmc-onenand: " Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: " Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti, gpmc: " Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" DT property is optional Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc, device-width" " Roger Quadros
2021-09-07 12:36   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2021-09-07 12:36     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-15  9:11     ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" " Roger Quadros
2021-09-15  9:11       ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc, device-width" " Roger Quadros
2021-09-16 10:48       ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-16 10:48         ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc, device-width" " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-17  7:17         ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" " Roger Quadros
2021-09-17  7:17           ` [PATCH v3 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc, device-width" " Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa465bd9-b3d5-8d75-3e59-e86c2cd093cd@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.