[PATCH v4 0/2] Mdmonitor improvements

[PATCH v4 0/2] Mdmonitor improvements

[Kinga Tanska]

Changes in v4:
- fix place where is_mddev is calling
- no new changes in "Mdmonitor: Improve logging method" patch

Kinga Tanska (2):
  Mdmonitor: Fix segfault
  Mdmonitor: Improve logging method

 Monitor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 mdadm.h   |  1 +
 mdopen.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 util.c    |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.2

[PATCH v4 1/2] Mdmonitor: Fix segfault

[Kinga Tanska]

Mdadm with "--monitor" parameter requires md device
as an argument to be monitored. If given argument is
not a md device, error shall be returned. Previously
it was not checked and invalid argument caused
segmentation fault. This commit adds checking
that devices passed to mdmonitor are md devices.

Signed-off-by: Kinga Tanska <kinga.tanska@intel.com>
---
 Monitor.c | 10 +++++++++-
 mdadm.h   |  1 +
 mdopen.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Monitor.c b/Monitor.c
index f5412299..3d0c147a 100644
--- a/Monitor.c
+++ b/Monitor.c
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ int Monitor(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
 				continue;
 			if (strcasecmp(mdlist->devname, "<ignore>") == 0)
 				continue;
+
 			st = xcalloc(1, sizeof *st);
 			if (mdlist->devname[0] == '/')
 				st->devname = xstrdup(mdlist->devname);
@@ -191,6 +192,8 @@ int Monitor(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
 				strcpy(strcpy(st->devname, "/dev/md/"),
 				       mdlist->devname);
 			}
+			if (!is_mddev(mdlist->devname))
+				return 1;
 			st->next = statelist;
 			st->devnm[0] = 0;
 			st->percent = RESYNC_UNKNOWN;
@@ -204,7 +207,12 @@ int Monitor(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
 		struct mddev_dev *dv;
 
 		for (dv = devlist; dv; dv = dv->next) {
-			struct state *st = xcalloc(1, sizeof *st);
+			struct state *st;
+
+			if (!is_mddev(dv->devname))
+				return 1;
+
+			st = xcalloc(1, sizeof *st);
 			mdlist = conf_get_ident(dv->devname);
 			st->devname = xstrdup(dv->devname);
 			st->next = statelist;
diff --git a/mdadm.h b/mdadm.h
index 8f8841d8..03151c34 100644
--- a/mdadm.h
+++ b/mdadm.h
@@ -1607,6 +1607,7 @@ extern int create_mddev(char *dev, char *name, int autof, int trustworthy,
 #define	FOREIGN	2
 #define	METADATA 3
 extern int open_mddev(char *dev, int report_errors);
+extern int is_mddev(char *dev);
 extern int open_container(int fd);
 extern int metadata_container_matches(char *metadata, char *devnm);
 extern int metadata_subdev_matches(char *metadata, char *devnm);
diff --git a/mdopen.c b/mdopen.c
index 245be537..d18c9319 100644
--- a/mdopen.c
+++ b/mdopen.c
@@ -475,6 +475,23 @@ int open_mddev(char *dev, int report_errors)
 	return mdfd;
 }
 
+/**
+ * is_mddev() - check that file name passed is an md device.
+ * @dev: file name that has to be checked.
+ * Return: 1 if file passed is an md device, 0 if not.
+ */
+int is_mddev(char *dev)
+{
+	int fd = open_mddev(dev, 1);
+
+	if (fd >= 0) {
+		close(fd);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char *find_free_devnm(int use_partitions)
 {
 	static char devnm[32];
-- 
2.26.2

[PATCH v4 2/2] Mdmonitor: Improve logging method

[Kinga Tanska]

Change logging, and as a result, mdmonitor in verbose
mode will report its configuration.

Signed-off-by: Kinga Tanska <kinga.tanska@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Shchirskyi <oleksandr.shchirskyi@intel.com>
---
 Monitor.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Monitor.c b/Monitor.c
index 0b24b656..bd417d04 100644
--- a/Monitor.c
+++ b/Monitor.c
@@ -137,24 +137,27 @@ int Monitor(struct mddev_dev *devlist,
 	struct mddev_ident *mdlist;
 	int delay_for_event = c->delay;
 
-	if (!mailaddr) {
+	if (!mailaddr)
 		mailaddr = conf_get_mailaddr();
-		if (mailaddr && ! c->scan)
-			pr_err("Monitor using email address \"%s\" from config file\n",
-			       mailaddr);
-	}
-	mailfrom = conf_get_mailfrom();
 
-	if (!alert_cmd) {
+	if (!alert_cmd)
 		alert_cmd = conf_get_program();
-		if (alert_cmd && !c->scan)
-			pr_err("Monitor using program \"%s\" from config file\n",
-			       alert_cmd);
-	}
+
+	mailfrom = conf_get_mailfrom();
+
 	if (c->scan && !mailaddr && !alert_cmd && !dosyslog) {
 		pr_err("No mail address or alert command - not monitoring.\n");
 		return 1;
 	}
+
+	if (c->verbose) {
+		pr_err("Monitor is started with delay %ds\n", c->delay);
+		if (mailaddr)
+			pr_err("Monitor using email address %s\n", mailaddr);
+		if (alert_cmd)
+			pr_err("Monitor using program %s\n", alert_cmd);
+	}
+
 	info.alert_cmd = alert_cmd;
 	info.mailaddr = mailaddr;
 	info.mailfrom = mailfrom;
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Mdmonitor: Fix segfault

[Jes Sorensen]

On 6/6/22 06:32, Kinga Tanska wrote:
> Mdadm with "--monitor" parameter requires md device
> as an argument to be monitored. If given argument is
> not a md device, error shall be returned. Previously
> it was not checked and invalid argument caused
> segmentation fault. This commit adds checking
> that devices passed to mdmonitor are md devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kinga Tanska <kinga.tanska@intel.com>
> ---
>  Monitor.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  mdadm.h   |  1 +
>  mdopen.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] Mdmonitor: Improve logging method

[Jes Sorensen]

On 6/6/22 06:32, Kinga Tanska wrote:
> Change logging, and as a result, mdmonitor in verbose
> mode will report its configuration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kinga Tanska <kinga.tanska@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Shchirskyi <oleksandr.shchirskyi@intel.com>
> ---
>  Monitor.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

Applied,

Thanks,
Jes

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Mdmonitor improvements

[Jes Sorensen]

On 6/6/22 06:32, Kinga Tanska wrote:
> Changes in v4:
> - fix place where is_mddev is calling
> - no new changes in "Mdmonitor: Improve logging method" patch
> 
> Kinga Tanska (2):
>   Mdmonitor: Fix segfault
>   Mdmonitor: Improve logging method
> 
>  Monitor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  mdadm.h   |  1 +
>  mdopen.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  util.c    |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 

Coly,

I am curious why these are marked Changes-requested in patchwork as
there are no replies in the thread.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-raid/patch/20220907125657.12192-2-mateusz.grzonka@intel.com/

Thanks,
Jes

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Mdmonitor improvements

[Coly Li]

> 2022年9月29日 23:08，Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org> 写道：
> 
> On 6/6/22 06:32, Kinga Tanska wrote:
>> Changes in v4:
>> - fix place where is_mddev is calling
>> - no new changes in "Mdmonitor: Improve logging method" patch
>> 
>> Kinga Tanska (2):
>>  Mdmonitor: Fix segfault
>>  Mdmonitor: Improve logging method
>> 
>> Monitor.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> mdadm.h   |  1 +
>> mdopen.c  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> util.c    |  2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> 
> 
> Coly,
> 
> I am curious why these are marked Changes-requested in patchwork as
> there are no replies in the thread.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-raid/patch/20220907125657.12192-2-mateusz.grzonka@intel.com/

Hi Jes,

I noticed this too, and asked Mariusz offline why these patches disappeared from my delegation, and he didn’t know why neither. So I just continue to review this series regardless its patchwork state. This is something I am not familiar with, so the progress is a bit slow.

Thanks.

Coly Li

Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Mdmonitor improvements

[Jes Sorensen]

On 9/29/22 11:19, Coly Li wrote:
> 
> 
>> 2022年9月29日 23:08，Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org> 写道：
>> Coly,
>>
>> I am curious why these are marked Changes-requested in patchwork as
>> there are no replies in the thread.
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-raid/patch/20220907125657.12192-2-mateusz.grzonka@intel.com/
> 
> Hi Jes,
> 
> I noticed this too, and asked Mariusz offline why these patches disappeared from my delegation, and he didn’t know why neither. So I just continue to review this series regardless its patchwork state. This is something I am not familiar with, so the progress is a bit slow.

No worries, I changed the marking to under review.

Thanks,
Jes