All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <cl@linux.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <paulus@samba.org>,
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaVYGCB+I7QLZo0+@fedora>


On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk
>> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations
>> on each architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/mm/init.c            | 16 +--------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------
>>   arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c     | 50 +-------------------------
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +-----------------------------
>>   drivers/base/arch_numa.c       | 19 +---------
>>   include/linux/percpu.h         |  9 +----
>>   mm/percpu.c                    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
>>   extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
>>   
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu);
>> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> -				     pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
>>   typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
>>   
>> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
>>   extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
>>   				size_t atom_size,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
>> +				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
>>   extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatten pcpu_build_alloc_info(
>>   
>>   	return ai;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> +				   pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long goal = __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS);
>> +	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +
>> +	if (cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +		node = cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu);
>> +
>> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(node)) {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal);
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal,
>> +					     MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
>> +	}
>> +	return ptr;
>> +}
> My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86
> implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA.

I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',  also will add back the 
pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does,

> Overall this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> .

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <cl@linux.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <paulus@samba.org>,
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaVYGCB+I7QLZo0+@fedora>


On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk
>> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations
>> on each architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/mm/init.c            | 16 +--------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------
>>   arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c     | 50 +-------------------------
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +-----------------------------
>>   drivers/base/arch_numa.c       | 19 +---------
>>   include/linux/percpu.h         |  9 +----
>>   mm/percpu.c                    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
>>   extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
>>   
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu);
>> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> -				     pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
>>   typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
>>   
>> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
>>   extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
>>   				size_t atom_size,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
>> +				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
>>   extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatten pcpu_build_alloc_info(
>>   
>>   	return ai;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> +				   pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long goal = __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS);
>> +	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +
>> +	if (cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +		node = cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu);
>> +
>> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(node)) {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal);
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal,
>> +					     MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
>> +	}
>> +	return ptr;
>> +}
> My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86
> implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA.

I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',  also will add back the 
pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does,

> Overall this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux.com,
	will@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
	bp@alien8.de, paul.walmsley@sifive.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaVYGCB+I7QLZo0+@fedora>


On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk
>> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations
>> on each architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/mm/init.c            | 16 +--------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------
>>   arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c     | 50 +-------------------------
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +-----------------------------
>>   drivers/base/arch_numa.c       | 19 +---------
>>   include/linux/percpu.h         |  9 +----
>>   mm/percpu.c                    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
>>   extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
>>   
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu);
>> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> -				     pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
>>   typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
>>   
>> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
>>   extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
>>   				size_t atom_size,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
>> +				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
>>   extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatten pcpu_build_alloc_info(
>>   
>>   	return ai;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> +				   pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long goal = __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS);
>> +	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +
>> +	if (cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +		node = cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu);
>> +
>> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(node)) {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal);
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal,
>> +					     MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
>> +	}
>> +	return ptr;
>> +}
> My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86
> implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA.

I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',  also will add back the 
pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does,

> Overall this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> .

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <cl@linux.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	<benh@kernel.crashing.org>, <paulus@samba.org>,
	<paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:27:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaVYGCB+I7QLZo0+@fedora>


On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk
>> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations
>> on each architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/mm/init.c            | 16 +--------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------
>>   arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c     | 50 +-------------------------
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +-----------------------------
>>   drivers/base/arch_numa.c       | 19 +---------
>>   include/linux/percpu.h         |  9 +----
>>   mm/percpu.c                    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
>>   extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
>>   
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu);
>> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> -				     pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
>>   typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
>>   
>> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
>>   extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
>>   				size_t atom_size,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
>> +				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
>>   extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatten pcpu_build_alloc_info(
>>   
>>   	return ai;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> +				   pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long goal = __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS);
>> +	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +
>> +	if (cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +		node = cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu);
>> +
>> +	if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(node)) {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal);
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal,
>> +					     MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
>> +	}
>> +	return ptr;
>> +}
> My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86
> implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA.

I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',  also will add back the 
pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does,

> Overall this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, tj@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	cl@linux.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:27:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YaVYGCB+I7QLZo0+@fedora>


On 2021/11/30 6:45, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 05:35:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> With previous patch, we could add a generic pcpu first chunk
>> allocation and free function to cleanup the duplicated definations
>> on each architecture.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/mm/init.c            | 16 +--------
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 51 ++------------------------
>>   arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c     | 50 +-------------------------
>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c | 59 +-----------------------------
>>   drivers/base/arch_numa.c       | 19 +---------
>>   include/linux/percpu.h         |  9 +----
>>   mm/percpu.c                    | 66 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   7 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)
...
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> index 41bb54715b0c..d73c97ef4ff4 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
>> @@ -95,9 +95,6 @@ extern const char * const pcpu_fc_names[PCPU_FC_NR];
>>   extern enum pcpu_fc pcpu_chosen_fc;
>>   
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t)(int cpu);
>> -typedef void * (*pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t)(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> -				     pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>> -typedef void (*pcpu_fc_free_fn_t)(void *ptr, size_t size);
>>   typedef void (*pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t)(unsigned long addr);
>>   typedef int (pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t)(unsigned int from, unsigned int to);
>>   
>> @@ -112,15 +109,11 @@ extern void __init pcpu_setup_first_chunk(const struct pcpu_alloc_info *ai,
>>   extern int __init pcpu_embed_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size, size_t dyn_size,
>>   				size_t atom_size,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_distance_fn_t cpu_distance_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn);
>> +				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn);
>>   #endif
>>   
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
>>   extern int __init pcpu_page_first_chunk(size_t reserved_size,
>> -				pcpu_fc_alloc_fn_t alloc_fn,
>> -				pcpu_fc_free_fn_t free_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn,
>>   				pcpu_fc_populate_pte_fn_t populate_pte_fn);
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 3f6cf1ff0be2..efaa1cbaf73d 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -2992,6 +2992,30 @@ static struct pcpu_alloc_info * __init __flatten pcpu_build_alloc_info(
>>   
>>   	return ai;
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void * __init pcpu_fc_alloc(unsigned int cpu, size_t size, size_t align,
>> +				   pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +{
>> +	const unsigned long goal = __pa(MAX_DMA_ADDRESS);
>> +	int node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>> +	void *ptr;
>> +
>> +	if (cpu_to_nd_fn)
>> +		node = cpu_to_nd_fn(cpu);
>> +
>> +	if (node = NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) || !NODE_DATA(node)) {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_from(size, align, goal);
>> +	} else {
>> +		ptr = memblock_alloc_try_nid(size, align, goal,
>> +					     MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, node);
>> +	}
>> +	return ptr;
>> +}
> My preference here would be to keep this identical to the x86
> implementation where we #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA.

I will add back '#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA',  also will add back the 
pr_debug/pr_info part as x86 does,

> Overall this makes sense.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-21  9:35 [PATCH RFC 0/4] mm: percpu: Cleanup percpu first chunk funciton Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm: percpu: Generalize percpu related config Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29 22:36   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:36     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:36     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:36     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:36     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-30  6:22     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-12-03 18:54   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-03 18:54     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-03 18:54     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-03 18:54     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-12-03 18:54     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-11-21  9:35 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] mm: percpu: Add pcpu_fc_cpu_to_node_fn_t typedef Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29 22:40   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:40     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:40     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:40     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:40     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-30  6:22     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:22       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_fc_alloc/free funciton Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29 22:45   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:45     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:45     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:45     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:45     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-30  6:27     ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2021-11-30  6:27       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:27       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:27       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:27       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] mm: percpu: Add generic pcpu_populate_pte() function Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-21  9:35   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29 22:49   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:49     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:49     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:49     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:49     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-30  6:42     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:42       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:42       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:42       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:42       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:51 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] mm: percpu: Cleanup percpu first chunk funciton Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:51   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  2:54   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29  2:54     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29  2:54     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29  2:54     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29  2:54     ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29  3:06     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  3:06       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  3:06       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  3:06       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29  3:06       ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-29 22:55 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:55   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:55   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:55   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-29 22:55   ` Dennis Zhou
2021-11-30  6:53   ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:53     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:53     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:53     ` Kefeng Wang
2021-11-30  6:53     ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab9b7446-e955-67da-b9f3-1e1c15566fdb@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.