From: Israel Rukshin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Eric Biggers <email@example.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
dm-devel <email@example.com>, Nitzan Carmi <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add inline encryption support for dm-crypt
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 12:15:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On 1/15/2022 12:49 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hi Israel,
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Israel Rukshin wrote:
>> I am working to add support for inline encryption/decryption
>> at storage protocols like nvmf over RDMA. The HW that I am
>> working with is ConnecX-6 Dx, which supports inline crypto
>> and can send the data on the fabric at the same time.
>> This patchset is based on v5.16-rc4 with Eric Biggers patches
>> of the HW wrapped keys.
>> It can be retrieved from branch "wip-wrapped-keys" at
>> I tested this patch with modified nvme-rdma as the block device
>> and created a DM crypt on top of it. I got performance enhancement
>> compared to SW crypto. I tested the HW wrapped inline mode with
>> the HW and the standard mode with a fallback algorithm.
>> Israel Rukshin (1):
>> dm crypt: Add inline encryption support
>> block/blk-crypto.c | 3 +
>> drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 2 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> I appreciate the interest in my patchset that adds support for hardware-wrapped
> inline encryption keys
> So far I've received very little feedback on it.
> One of the challenges I've been having is that I still have no platform on which
> I can actually test hardware-wrapped keys with the upstream kernel. The feature
> cannot be accepted upstream until there is a way to test it. It's almost
> working on the SM8350 SoC, but I am waiting for Qualcomm to fix some things.
> It sounds like you've implemented a block device driver that exposes support for
> hardware-wrapped keys. Can you please post that driver?
Yes, I implemented your inline callbacks at nvme-rdma driver. The driver
the HW via a general ib_verbs layer, so I had to extend ib_verbs and
mlx5_ib drivers. Those
patches are at internal review and I will send the nvme-rdma patches
> Can you also elaborate on how wrapped keys work in your case? In particular,
> are they compatible with the whole design which I've documented in detail in my
> patchset? That would include implementing the ->import_key, ->generate_key,
> ->prepare_key, and ->derive_sw_secret operations. All the different parts are
> important. If something needs to be optional, that's something I can consider
> incorporating into the design, but it would restrict the use cases.
In my case, the user should create wrapped keys by himself via a user
space tool based
on openssl library. Therefore, the ->import_key, ->generate_key and
not necessary at my case. Regarding ->derive_sw_secret, it is not
supported right now by
ConnectX6 DX firmware (we plan to add support for this). To test
fscrypt with wrapped keys,
a temporary WA was added to the ->derive_sw_secret at nvme-rdma driver.
The other callbacks
you mentioned were left empty.
> Also, will your driver only support wrapped keys, or will it support standard
> keys too?
Our driver will support both modes. The first step is to support the
standard keys, because of
the gap I mentioned above. As I understand, ->derive_sw_secret is not
needed for dm-crypt.
Is that right?
> - Eric
dm-devel mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-16 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 18:09 [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add inline encryption support for dm-crypt Israel Rukshin
2022-01-13 18:09 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 1/1] dm crypt: Add inline encryption support Israel Rukshin
2022-01-14 8:06 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-14 8:14 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-01-16 10:29 ` Israel Rukshin
2022-01-13 21:22 ` [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add inline encryption support for dm-crypt Bart Van Assche
2022-01-14 20:51 ` Milan Broz
2022-01-14 22:27 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-15 9:22 ` Milan Broz
2022-01-18 19:38 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-19 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-17 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-17 10:50 ` Milan Broz
2022-01-17 14:00 ` Israel Rukshin
2022-01-18 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-18 20:27 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-19 5:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-01-14 22:49 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-16 10:15 ` Israel Rukshin [this message]
2022-01-18 20:02 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-19 15:45 ` Israel Rukshin
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.