* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-11 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-11 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> --- .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | 2 +- .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | 0 .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | 0 meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | 0 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} (100%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc similarity index 89% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the # repo during parse -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb -- 2.14.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-11 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-11 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List; +Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> --- .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | 2 +- .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | 0 .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | 0 meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | 0 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} (100%) diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc similarity index 89% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the # repo during parse -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb similarity index 100% rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb -- 2.14.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-11 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador (?) @ 2017-09-13 20:05 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador -1 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-13 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/11/2017 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> Wrong ML, but since this is already here ... > --- > > .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | 2 +- > .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | 0 > .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | 0 > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | 0 > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} (100%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > similarity index 89% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > > # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > # repo during parse > -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > > SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ > file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ ... file://10m50-update-device-tree.patch What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. [...] -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-13 20:05 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-13 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: ... > What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently > posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-13 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Tom Rini, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: ... > What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently > posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador (?) @ 2017-09-13 20:20 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador -1 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-13 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/13/2017 10:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: > ... >> What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently >> posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. > > I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? How does that matter ? I am asking about the status of those patches and why they didn't make it upstream yet. Something should be done about that. Automated update of the U-Boot recipe version is great and all, but that's not all that should be done when new version is released . The outstanding patches need to be rechecked every now and then too so they get upstream and don't start piling up in OE core. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-13 20:20 ` Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-13 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Marek, On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/13/2017 10:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >>> What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently >>> posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. >> >> I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? > > How does that matter ? I am asking about the status of those patches and > why they didn't make it upstream yet. Something should be done about that. > > Automated update of the U-Boot recipe version is great and all, but > that's not all that should be done when new version is released . The > outstanding patches need to be rechecked every now and then too so they > get upstream and don't start piling up in OE core. You are the maintainer, so step up and do it. I did the upgrade as I had it here for testing so I thought it would be good to send it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-13 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, Tom Rini Marek, On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/13/2017 10:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: >> ... >>> What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently >>> posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. >> >> I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? > > How does that matter ? I am asking about the status of those patches and > why they didn't make it upstream yet. Something should be done about that. > > Automated update of the U-Boot recipe version is great and all, but > that's not all that should be done when new version is released . The > outstanding patches need to be rechecked every now and then too so they > get upstream and don't start piling up in OE core. You are the maintainer, so step up and do it. I did the upgrade as I had it here for testing so I thought it would be good to send it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador (?) @ 2017-09-13 21:23 ` Marek Vasut -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-13 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/13/2017 11:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Marek, > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 09/13/2017 10:11 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ... >>>> What is the status of those dangling patches ? They were apparently >>>> posted, but didn't make it into the last two (?) releases. >>> >>> I am confused. Are you asking for U-Boot community or OE community? >> >> How does that matter ? I am asking about the status of those patches and >> why they didn't make it upstream yet. Something should be done about that. >> >> Automated update of the U-Boot recipe version is great and all, but >> that's not all that should be done when new version is released . The >> outstanding patches need to be rechecked every now and then too so they >> get upstream and don't start piling up in OE core. > > You are the maintainer, so step up and do it. I did the upgrade as I > had it here for testing so I thought it would be good to send it. Right ... low-hanging fruit and all, so sad :-( Let's see about those two patches then, they should be sorted out shortly ... -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-11 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-17 9:18 ` Martin Jansa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or directory I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in do_compile: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 V=1 rpi_3_32b_config | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 | ERROR: oe_runmake failed | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/log.do_compile.12859) ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > --- > > .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} > | 2 +- > .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => > u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => > u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => > u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > (100%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > similarity index 89% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > > # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > # repo during parse > -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > > SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ > file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > -- > 2.14.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-17 9:18 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Otavio Salvador; +Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4451 bytes --] Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or directory I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in do_compile: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 V=1 rpi_3_32b_config | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 | ERROR: oe_runmake failed | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/log.do_compile.12859) ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > --- > > .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} > | 2 +- > .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > | 0 > 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => > u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => > u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => > u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) > rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > (100%) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > similarity index 89% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > > # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > # repo during parse > -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > > SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ > file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > similarity index 100% > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > -- > 2.14.1 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7515 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-17 9:18 ` Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 11:06 ` Martin Jansa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv correctly with 2017.07. And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As nobody is using it and it's not tested? On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > > u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > directory > > I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > do_compile: > > Log data follows: > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- > boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 > -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ > 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- > linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. > 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ > u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 V=1 > rpi_3_32b_config > | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ > log.do_compile.12859) > ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- > utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br > > wrote: > >> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} >> | 2 +- >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> similarity index 89% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >> >> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >> # repo during parse >> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >> >> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-17 11:06 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Otavio Salvador; +Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4964 bytes --] I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv correctly with 2017.07. And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As nobody is using it and it's not tested? On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > > u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > directory > > I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > do_compile: > > Log data follows: > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- > boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 > -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ > 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- > linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. > 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ > u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 V=1 > rpi_3_32b_config > | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ > log.do_compile.12859) > ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- > utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br > > wrote: > >> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} >> | 2 +- >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> | 0 >> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> similarity index 89% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >> >> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >> # repo during parse >> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >> >> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8416 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-17 11:06 ` Martin Jansa (?) @ 2017-09-18 5:32 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-18 7:54 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa -1 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-18 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv > correctly with 2017.07. > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro > and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > nobody is using it and it's not tested? Nobody apparently even build-tested this patch before submission, gurrr. Speaking of cross versions of U-Boot fwutils and printenv/setenv , they are used by boards for modifying U-Boot environment on the target from Linux, so removing them would break a lot of boards -- NAK. > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? >> >> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or >> directory >> >> I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in >> do_compile: >> >> Log data follows: >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile >> | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- >> boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 >> -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib >> -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ >> 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- >> linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. >> 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ >> u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 V=1 >> rpi_3_32b_config >> | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic >> | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 >> -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c >> | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found >> | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 >> | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed >> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. >> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at >> work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ >> log.do_compile.12859) >> ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- >> utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br >>> wrote: >> >>> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >>> --- >>> >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} >>> | 2 +- >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} >>> | 0 >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} >>> | 0 >>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >>> | 0 >>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >>> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >>> (100%) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> similarity index 89% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >>> >>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >>> # repo during parse >>> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >>> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >>> >>> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >>> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >>> -- >>> 2.14.1 >>> >>> -- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 5:32 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-18 7:54 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-18 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot of boards, why nobody complained yet? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv > > correctly with 2017.07. > > > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro > > and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > > nobody is using it and it's not tested? > > Nobody apparently even build-tested this patch before submission, gurrr. > > Speaking of cross versions of U-Boot fwutils and printenv/setenv , they > are used by boards for modifying U-Boot environment on the target from > Linux, so removing them would break a lot of boards -- NAK. > > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > >> > >> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > >> directory > >> > >> I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > >> do_compile: > >> > >> Log data follows: > >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > >> | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- > >> boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 > >> -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/ > recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > >> -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/ > recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ > >> 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- > >> linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. > >> 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ > >> u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 > V=1 > >> rpi_3_32b_config > >> | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > >> | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > >> -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > >> | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > >> | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > >> | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > >> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > >> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > >> work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ > >> log.do_compile.12859) > >> ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- > >> utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador < > otavio at ossystems.com.br > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} > >>> | 2 +- > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => > >>> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => > >>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => > >>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => > u-boot_2017.09.bb} > >>> (100%) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> similarity index 89% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > >>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > >>> > >>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > >>> # repo during parse > >>> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > >>> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > >>> > >>> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ > >>> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > >>> -- > >>> 2.14.1 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Openembedded-core mailing list > >>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org > >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 7:54 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-18 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6064 bytes --] u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot of boards, why nobody complained yet? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv > > correctly with 2017.07. > > > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro > > and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > > nobody is using it and it's not tested? > > Nobody apparently even build-tested this patch before submission, gurrr. > > Speaking of cross versions of U-Boot fwutils and printenv/setenv , they > are used by boards for modifying U-Boot environment on the target from > Linux, so removing them would break a lot of boards -- NAK. > > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > >> > >> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > >> directory > >> > >> I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > >> do_compile: > >> > >> Log data follows: > >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > >> | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- > >> boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 > >> -pipe -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/ > recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > >> -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/ > recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ > >> 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- > >> linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. > >> 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ > >> u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib -Wl,-O1 > V=1 > >> rpi_3_32b_config > >> | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > >> | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > >> -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > >> | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > >> | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > >> | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > >> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > >> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > >> work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ > >> log.do_compile.12859) > >> ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- > >> utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador < > otavio@ossystems.com.br > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} > >>> | 2 +- > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} > >>> | 0 > >>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => > >>> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => > >>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => > >>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => > u-boot_2017.09.bb} > >>> (100%) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> similarity index 89% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > >>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > >>> > >>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > >>> # repo during parse > >>> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > >>> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > >>> > >>> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ > >>> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > >>> -- > >>> 2.14.1 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Openembedded-core mailing list > >>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10416 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 7:54 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa (?) @ 2017-09-18 8:31 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-18 8:39 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa -1 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-18 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot > of boards, why nobody complained yet? Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? btw stop top-posting please. > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:32 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com > <mailto:marek.vasut@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 09/17/2017 01:06 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > I've verified that u-boot-fw-utils builds and installs fw_printenv > > correctly with 2017.07. > > > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro > > and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > > nobody is using it and it's not tested? > > Nobody apparently even build-tested this patch before submission, gurrr. > > Speaking of cross versions of U-Boot fwutils and printenv/setenv , they > are used by boards for modifying U-Boot environment on the target from > Linux, so removing them would break a lot of boards -- NAK. > > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Martin Jansa > <martin.jansa at gmail.com <mailto:martin.jansa@gmail.com>> > > wrote: > > > >> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > >> > >> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such > file or > >> directory > >> > >> I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > >> do_compile: > >> > >> Log data follows: > >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > >> | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u- > >> > boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include -O2 > >> -pipe > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > >> > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_ > >> 2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64- > >> linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017. > >> 09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/ > >> u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-O1 V=1 > >> rpi_3_32b_config > >> | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > >> | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > >> -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep > scripts/basic/fixdep.c > >> | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > >> | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > >> | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > >> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > >> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > >> work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/ > >> log.do_compile.12859) > >> ERROR: Task (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw- > >> utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) failed with exit code '1' > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador > <otavio at ossystems.com.br <mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br > <mailto:otavio@ossystems.com.br>> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} > >>> | 2 +- > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb> => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb>} > >>> | 0 > >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb> => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb>} > >>> | 0 > >>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.07.bb> => u-boot_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.09.bb>} > >>> | 0 > >>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => > >>> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb> => > >>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb>} > (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb> => > >>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb>} (100%) > >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.07.bb> => u-boot_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.09.bb>} > >>> (100%) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> similarity index 89% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 > >>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc > >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc > >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" > >>> > >>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the > >>> # repo during parse > >>> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" > >>> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" > >>> > >>> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git > <http://git.denx.de/u-boot.git> \ > >>> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb> > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb> > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb> > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb> > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb> > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb> > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb> > >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.07.bb> > >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.09.bb> > >>> similarity index 100% > >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.07.bb> > >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb > <http://u-boot_2017.09.bb> > >>> -- > >>> 2.14.1 > >>> > >>> -- > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Openembedded-core mailing list > >>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org > <mailto:Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org> > >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core> > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot at lists.denx.de <mailto:U-Boot@lists.denx.de> > > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > <https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot> > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 8:31 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-18 8:39 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-18 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot > > of boards, why nobody complained yet? > > Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As nobody is using it and it's not tested? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170918/9990ed1a/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 8:39 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-18 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 556 bytes --] On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot > > of boards, why nobody complained yet? > > Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As nobody is using it and it's not tested? [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 8:39 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-18 15:20 ` Philip Balister -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2017-09-18 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot >>> of boards, why nobody complained yet? >> >> Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? > > u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and > 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > nobody is using it and it's not tested? What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? Philip -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 516 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170918/7a062495/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 15:20 ` Philip Balister 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2017-09-18 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Jansa, Marek Vasut Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --] On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot >>> of boards, why nobody complained yet? >> >> Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? > > u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and > 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > nobody is using it and it's not tested? What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? Philip [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 527 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 15:20 ` [U-Boot] " Philip Balister @ 2017-09-18 15:46 ` Otavio Salvador -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-18 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Em 18 de set de 2017 12:20 PM, "Philip Balister" <philip@balister.org> escreveu: On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot >>> of boards, why nobody complained yet? >> >> Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? > > u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and > 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > nobody is using it and it's not tested? What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? Why? It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. As Martin said, it was already broken. I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 15:46 ` Otavio Salvador 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-18 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Balister Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Marek Vasut, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1094 bytes --] Em 18 de set de 2017 12:20 PM, "Philip Balister" <philip@balister.org> escreveu: On 09/18/2017 02:39 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:31:05AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 09:54 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >>> u-boot-fw-utils-cross is broken for at least a year, if it breaks a lot >>> of boards, why nobody complained yet? >> >> Didn't you say it worked for 2017.07 or did I misunderstand that ? > > u-boot-fw-utils did work, u-boot-fw-utils-cross no, read it again: > > And that u-boot-fw-utils-cross was broken even with Yocto 2.3 Pyro and > 2017.01 version there, maybe it's time to remove cross version? As > nobody is using it and it's not tested? What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? Why? It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. As Martin said, it was already broken. I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1802 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 15:46 ` [U-Boot] " Otavio Salvador @ 2017-09-18 15:51 ` Burton, Ross -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-09-18 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? > > > Why? > > It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. > > As Martin said, it was already broken. > > I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades > has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. > Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. Ross ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 15:51 ` Burton, Ross 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Burton, Ross @ 2017-09-18 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Otavio Salvador Cc: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List, Marek Vasut, U-Boot Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --] On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? > > > Why? > > It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. > > As Martin said, it was already broken. > > I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades > has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. > Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. Ross [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1661 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 15:51 ` [U-Boot] " Burton, Ross @ 2017-09-18 16:06 ` Tom Rini -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2017-09-18 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < > otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote: > > > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? > > > > > > Why? > > > > It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. > > > > As Martin said, it was already broken. > > > > I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades > > has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. > > > > Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. > > Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes > that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't > keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every > BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170918/e77d5853/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-18 16:06 ` Tom Rini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Tom Rini @ 2017-09-18 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Burton, Ross Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Marek Vasut, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1484 bytes --] On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < > otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > > > What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the > > > > release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? > > > > > > Why? > > > > It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. > > > > As Martin said, it was already broken. > > > > I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades > > has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. > > > > Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. > > Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes > that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't > keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every > BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. -- Tom [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-18 16:06 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini @ 2017-09-19 8:15 ` Marek Vasut -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-19 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >> otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> >>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>> >>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>> >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>> >>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>> >>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>> >> >> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >> >> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. > > Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release > schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a > good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. > > Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's > been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that > no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next > release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-19 8:15 ` Marek Vasut 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-19 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Rini, Burton, Ross Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >> otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> >>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>> >>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>> >>> >>> Why? >>> >>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>> >>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>> >>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>> >> >> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >> >> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. > > Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release > schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a > good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. > > Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's > been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that > no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next > release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-19 8:15 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-21 21:35 ` Philip Balister -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2017-09-21 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>> otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>> >>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>> >>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>> >>>> >>>> Why? >>>> >>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>> >>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>> >>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>> >>> >>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>> >>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >> >> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >> >> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. > > I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. > OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-21 21:35 ` Philip Balister 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Philip Balister @ 2017-09-21 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut, Tom Rini, Burton, Ross Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>> otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>> >>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>> >>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>> >>>> >>>> Why? >>>> >>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>> >>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>> >>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>> >>> >>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>> >>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >> >> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >> >> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. > > I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. > OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-21 21:35 ` [U-Boot] " Philip Balister @ 2017-09-22 22:19 ` Marek Vasut -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>>> otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>>> >>>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why? >>>>> >>>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>>> >>>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>>> >>>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>>> >>>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >>> >>> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >>> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >>> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >>> >>> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >>> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >>> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >>> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. >> >> I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. >> > > OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about > timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to > decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to 2017.09 or not ? > Philip > > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-22 22:19 ` Marek Vasut 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Balister, Tom Rini, Burton, Ross Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>>> otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>>> >>>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why? >>>>> >>>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>>> >>>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>>> >>>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>>> >>>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >>> >>> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >>> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >>> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >>> >>> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >>> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >>> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >>> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. >> >> I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. >> > > OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about > timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to > decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to 2017.09 or not ? > Philip > > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-22 22:19 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 22:22 ` Moritz Fischer -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-09-22 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Marek, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>>>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>>>> otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>>>> >>>>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? >>>>>> >>>>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>>>> >>>>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>>>> >>>>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>>>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>>>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>>>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >>>> >>>> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >>>> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >>>> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >>>> >>>> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >>>> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >>>> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >>>> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. >>> >>> I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. >>> >> >> OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about >> timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to >> decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. > > Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to > 2017.09 or not ? +1 for upgrade. - morats > >> Philip >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-22 22:22 ` Moritz Fischer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-09-22 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: Tom Rini, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List, U-Boot Mailing List Hi Marek, On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote: > On 09/21/2017 11:35 PM, Philip Balister wrote: >> On 09/19/2017 04:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 09/18/2017 06:06 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 04:51:31PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: >>>>> On 18 September 2017 at 16:46, Otavio Salvador < >>>>> otavio.salvador@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> What is the policy on doing u-boot version upgrades this late in the >>>>>> >>>>>> release cycle? SHouldn't this wait until after the release? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? >>>>>> >>>>>> It is just another recipe and we are upgrading to the final release. >>>>>> >>>>>> As Martin said, it was already broken. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll take the responsibility to fix it. But as other packages, upgrades >>>>>> has risk and we have more than enough time to proper fix it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why? Because it was merged to master after the freeze. >>>>> >>>>> Personally I'm of the opinion that u-boot is one of those special recipes >>>>> that if an upgrade appears just after freeze, we consider it. If we don't >>>>> keep it up to date BSPs won't use the recipe, and we'll be back to every >>>>> BSP layer containing its own special copy of the u-boot recipe. >>>> >>>> Also please note that U-Boot has a rather regular and public release >>>> schedule: http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle so you can have a >>>> good idea beforehand if you want to grab something for a release or not. >>>> >>>> Personally, I would like to see this in. But the security issue that's >>>> been disclosed now is "resolved" just by not enabling functionality that >>>> no one was enabling in mainline, and will be removed in the next >>>> release, so don't feel you need to pull it in on those grounds. >>> >>> I agree that the 2017.09 upgrade is a good idea. >>> >> >> OK, I just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page about >> timing of the update. We certainly don't want very many recipes to >> decide they are special and take version bumps right up to release. > > Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to > 2017.09 or not ? +1 for upgrade. - morats > >> Philip >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Marek Vasut > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-22 22:19 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 23:36 ` Martin Jansa -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-22 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to > 2017.09 or not ? It was already merged couple days ago: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=340d413f678a4a64dfa060e8fe0ac721b73fed97 and the follow-up fix for u-boot-fw-utils as well: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=73afabf8e69019f08b424a06f3eafaab052b0606 -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20170923/33343cbb/attachment.sig> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-22 23:36 ` Martin Jansa 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-22 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marek Vasut Cc: Tom Rini, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List, U-Boot Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 513 bytes --] On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to > 2017.09 or not ? It was already merged couple days ago: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=340d413f678a4a64dfa060e8fe0ac721b73fed97 and the follow-up fix for u-boot-fw-utils as well: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=73afabf8e69019f08b424a06f3eafaab052b0606 -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 201 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-22 23:36 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-22 23:44 ` Marek Vasut -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 09/23/2017 01:36 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to >> 2017.09 or not ? > > It was already merged couple days ago: > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=340d413f678a4a64dfa060e8fe0ac721b73fed97 > > and the follow-up fix for u-boot-fw-utils as well: > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=73afabf8e69019f08b424a06f3eafaab052b0606 > Super, thanks. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-22 23:44 ` Marek Vasut 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Marek Vasut @ 2017-09-22 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Jansa Cc: Tom Rini, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List, U-Boot Mailing List On 09/23/2017 01:36 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Agreed. So what is the conclusion here about this , are we updating to >> 2017.09 or not ? > > It was already merged couple days ago: > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=340d413f678a4a64dfa060e8fe0ac721b73fed97 > > and the follow-up fix for u-boot-fw-utils as well: > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=73afabf8e69019f08b424a06f3eafaab052b0606 > Super, thanks. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-17 9:18 ` Martin Jansa @ 2017-09-17 15:35 ` Khem Raj -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2017-09-17 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. > u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > directory > > I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > do_compile: > > Log data follows: > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc > -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include > -O2 -pipe > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-O1 V=1 rpi_3_32b_config > | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/log.do_compile.12859) > ERROR: Task > (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) > failed with exit code '1' > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > wrote: >> >> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | >> 2 +- >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> similarity index 89% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >> >> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >> # repo during parse >> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >> >> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-17 15:35 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2017-09-17 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Martin Jansa Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? > I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. > u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or > directory > > I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in > do_compile: > > Log data follows: > | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile > | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc > -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include > -O2 -pipe > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib > -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib > -Wl,-O1 V=1 rpi_3_32b_config > | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic > | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 > -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c > | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found > | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 > | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 > | ERROR: oe_runmake failed > | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. > | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at > work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/log.do_compile.12859) > ERROR: Task > (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) > failed with exit code '1' > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> > wrote: >> >> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >> >> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >> --- >> >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | >> 2 +- >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | >> 0 >> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >> (100%) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> similarity index 89% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >> >> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >> # repo during parse >> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >> >> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> similarity index 100% >> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >> -- >> 2.14.1 >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-17 15:35 ` Khem Raj (?) @ 2017-09-18 8:39 ` Łukasz Majewski -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Łukasz Majewski @ 2017-09-18 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Khem, > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote: >> Is anyone seeing u-boot-fw-utils.do_install failure with this? >> > > I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. Please pay note to change in directory structure in u-boot envs (from 2017.09): Now to build fw_printenv one needs to run: do_compile () { oe_runmake ${UBOOT_MACHINE} oe_runmake envtools (<- was env) } And Yes, I do agree with Marek, fw_printf is widely used on many, many boards ..... > >> u-boot-fw-utils/1_2017.09-r0/git/tools/env/fw_printenv: No such file or >> directory >> >> I've tried u-boot-fw-utils-cross, but it fails as well even sooner in >> do_compile: >> >> Log data follows: >> | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_compile >> | NOTE: make -j 32 ARCH=arm CC=gcc >> -isystemwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/include >> -O2 -pipe >> -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib >> -Lwork/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib >> -Wl,-rpath-link,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/lib >> -Wl,-rpath,work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/lib >> -Wl,-O1 V=1 rpi_3_32b_config >> | make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic >> | cc -Wp,-MD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 >> -fomit-frame-pointer -o scripts/basic/fixdep scripts/basic/fixdep.c >> | /bin/sh: 1: cc: not found >> | make[1]: *** [scripts/basic/fixdep] Error 127 >> | make: *** [scripts_basic] Error 2 >> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed >> | WARNING: exit code 1 from a shell command. >> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at >> work/x86_64-linux/u-boot-fw-utils-cross/1_2017.09-r0/temp/log.do_compile.12859) >> ERROR: Task >> (virtual:cross:oe-core/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb:do_compile) >> failed with exit code '1' >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >> wrote: >>> >>> This upgrades the U-Boot to the 2017.09 release. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br> >>> --- >>> >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} | >>> 2 +- >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} | >>> 0 >>> .../u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} | >>> 0 >>> meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} | >>> 0 >>> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-common_2017.07.inc => >>> u-boot-common_2017.09.inc} (89%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb => >>> u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb} (100%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb => >>> u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb} (100%) >>> rename meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/{u-boot_2017.07.bb => u-boot_2017.09.bb} >>> (100%) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> similarity index 89% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> index e37f5fd409..02e51242cb 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.07.inc >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-common_2017.09.inc >>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ PE = "1" >>> >>> # We use the revision in order to avoid having to fetch it from the >>> # repo during parse >>> -SRCREV = "d85ca029f257b53a96da6c2fb421e78a003a9943" >>> +SRCREV = "c98ac3487e413c71e5d36322ef3324b21c6f60f9" >>> >>> SRC_URI = "git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git \ >>> file://MPC8315ERDB-enable-DHCP.patch \ >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-fw-utils_2017.09.bb >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-mkimage_2017.09.bb >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >>> b/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >>> similarity index 100% >>> rename from meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.07.bb >>> rename to meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2017.09.bb >>> -- >>> 2.14.1 >>> >>> -- >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openembedded-core mailing list >>> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org >>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> >> >> >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-core mailing list >> Openembedded-core at lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >> > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot at lists.denx.de > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot > -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 2017-09-17 15:35 ` Khem Raj @ 2017-09-19 2:11 ` Randy MacLeod -1 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Randy MacLeod @ 2017-09-19 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 2017-09-17 11:35 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. Same here. Jackie said that he's going to investigate now. We've only seen this failure since 2017-09-15 06:00 AM ET after we rebased onto 2017-09-14 content/ this commit: 583dca2 meta/conf/layers.conf: Add ca-certificates as ABISAFE 75e918d linux-firmware: package Marvell PCIe WiFi firmwares 0001cee insane: don't pass skip list to functions which don't ... 340d413 u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 ... -- # Randy MacLeod. WR Linux # Wind River an Intel Company ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 @ 2017-09-19 2:11 ` Randy MacLeod 0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread From: Randy MacLeod @ 2017-09-19 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj, Martin Jansa, Huang, Jie (Jackie) Cc: U-Boot Mailing List, Otavio Salvador, OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List On 2017-09-17 11:35 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > I am seeing same failures too. havent yet dug into it. Same here. Jackie said that he's going to investigate now. We've only seen this failure since 2017-09-15 06:00 AM ET after we rebased onto 2017-09-14 content/ this commit: 583dca2 meta/conf/layers.conf: Add ca-certificates as ABISAFE 75e918d linux-firmware: package Marvell PCIe WiFi firmwares 0001cee insane: don't pass skip list to functions which don't ... 340d413 u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 ... -- # Randy MacLeod. WR Linux # Wind River an Intel Company ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-22 23:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-09-11 20:30 [U-Boot] [PATCH] u-boot: Upgrade to 2017.09 Otavio Salvador 2017-09-11 20:30 ` Otavio Salvador 2017-09-13 20:05 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador 2017-09-13 20:11 ` Otavio Salvador 2017-09-13 20:20 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador 2017-09-13 21:02 ` Otavio Salvador 2017-09-13 21:23 ` Marek Vasut 2017-09-17 9:18 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-17 9:18 ` Martin Jansa 2017-09-17 11:06 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-17 11:06 ` Martin Jansa 2017-09-18 5:32 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-18 7:54 ` Martin Jansa 2017-09-18 7:54 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-18 8:31 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-18 8:39 ` Martin Jansa 2017-09-18 8:39 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-18 15:20 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Philip Balister 2017-09-18 15:20 ` [U-Boot] " Philip Balister 2017-09-18 15:46 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Otavio Salvador 2017-09-18 15:46 ` [U-Boot] " Otavio Salvador 2017-09-18 15:51 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Burton, Ross 2017-09-18 15:51 ` [U-Boot] " Burton, Ross 2017-09-18 16:06 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Tom Rini 2017-09-18 16:06 ` [U-Boot] " Tom Rini 2017-09-19 8:15 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-19 8:15 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-21 21:35 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Philip Balister 2017-09-21 21:35 ` [U-Boot] " Philip Balister 2017-09-22 22:19 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-22 22:19 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-22 22:22 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Moritz Fischer 2017-09-22 22:22 ` [U-Boot] " Moritz Fischer 2017-09-22 23:36 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-22 23:36 ` [U-Boot] " Martin Jansa 2017-09-22 23:44 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-22 23:44 ` [U-Boot] " Marek Vasut 2017-09-17 15:35 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Khem Raj 2017-09-17 15:35 ` Khem Raj 2017-09-18 8:39 ` [U-Boot] [OE-core] " Łukasz Majewski 2017-09-19 2:11 ` Randy MacLeod 2017-09-19 2:11 ` Randy MacLeod
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.