* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management
@ 2020-07-28 6:52 Xiao Wang
2020-07-28 7:45 ` Xia, Chenbo
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Wang @ 2020-07-28 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: maxime.coquelin; +Cc: dev, zhihong.wang, chenbo.xia, Xiao Wang, stable
Apart from the virtio status, there should be also a network related
status for link status management, current implementation mixes up these
two statuses.
One issue caused by this mixup is when virtio-user running in server mode
and vhost as a client connects to it, a RARP packet will be generated by
virtio-user due to VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE bit is detected in the "status"
in interrupt handler.
VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE should be managed by a
separated field. This patch adds a "net_status" field for this purpose.
Fixes: e9efa4d93821 ("net/virtio-user: add new virtual PCI driver")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 1 +
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
index 56e638f8a..554174e81 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
* (Vhost-user only)
*/
uint8_t status;
+ uint16_t net_status;
uint16_t port_id;
uint8_t mac_addr[RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
char path[PATH_MAX];
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
index e51425c4f..6003f6d50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, size_t offset,
}
r = recv(dev->vhostfd, buf, 128, MSG_PEEK);
if (r == 0 || (r < 0 && errno != EAGAIN)) {
- dev->status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
+ dev->net_status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "virtio-user port %u is down",
hw->port_id);
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, size_t offset,
virtio_user_delayed_handler,
(void *)hw);
} else {
- dev->status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
+ dev->net_status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
}
if (fcntl(dev->vhostfd, F_SETFL,
flags & ~O_NONBLOCK) == -1) {
@@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, size_t offset,
return;
}
} else if (dev->is_server) {
- dev->status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
+ dev->net_status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
if (virtio_user_server_reconnect(dev) >= 0)
- dev->status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
+ dev->net_status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
}
- *(uint16_t *)dst = dev->status;
+ *(uint16_t *)dst = dev->net_status;
}
if (offset == offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, max_virtqueue_pairs))
--
2.15.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management
2020-07-28 6:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management Xiao Wang
@ 2020-07-28 7:45 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-07-28 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-28 15:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xia, Chenbo @ 2020-07-28 7:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wang, Xiao W, maxime.coquelin; +Cc: dev, Wang, Zhihong, stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 2:52 PM
> To: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management
>
> Apart from the virtio status, there should be also a network related status for
> link status management, current implementation mixes up these two statuses.
>
> One issue caused by this mixup is when virtio-user running in server mode and
> vhost as a client connects to it, a RARP packet will be generated by virtio-user
> due to VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE bit is detected in the "status"
> in interrupt handler.
>
> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE should be managed by
> a separated field. This patch adds a "net_status" field for this purpose.
>
> Fixes: e9efa4d93821 ("net/virtio-user: add new virtual PCI driver")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> index 56e638f8a..554174e81 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct virtio_user_dev {
> * (Vhost-user only)
> */
> uint8_t status;
> + uint16_t net_status;
> uint16_t port_id;
> uint8_t mac_addr[RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
> char path[PATH_MAX];
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> index e51425c4f..6003f6d50 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw,
> size_t offset,
> }
> r = recv(dev->vhostfd, buf, 128, MSG_PEEK);
> if (r == 0 || (r < 0 && errno != EAGAIN)) {
> - dev->status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> + dev->net_status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "virtio-user port %u is
> down",
> hw->port_id);
>
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw,
> size_t offset,
> virtio_user_delayed_handler,
> (void *)hw);
> } else {
> - dev->status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> + dev->net_status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> }
> if (fcntl(dev->vhostfd, F_SETFL,
> flags & ~O_NONBLOCK) == -1) {
> @@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ virtio_user_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw,
> size_t offset,
> return;
> }
> } else if (dev->is_server) {
> - dev->status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> + dev->net_status &= (~VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP);
> if (virtio_user_server_reconnect(dev) >= 0)
> - dev->status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> + dev->net_status |= VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> }
>
> - *(uint16_t *)dst = dev->status;
> + *(uint16_t *)dst = dev->net_status;
> }
>
> if (offset == offsetof(struct virtio_net_config, max_virtqueue_pairs))
> --
> 2.15.1
Reviewed-by: Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management
2020-07-28 6:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management Xiao Wang
2020-07-28 7:45 ` Xia, Chenbo
@ 2020-07-28 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-28 15:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2020-07-28 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Wang; +Cc: dev, zhihong.wang, chenbo.xia, stable
On 7/28/20 8:52 AM, Xiao Wang wrote:
> Apart from the virtio status, there should be also a network related
> status for link status management, current implementation mixes up these
> two statuses.
>
> One issue caused by this mixup is when virtio-user running in server mode
> and vhost as a client connects to it, a RARP packet will be generated by
> virtio-user due to VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE bit is detected in the "status"
> in interrupt handler.
>
> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE should be managed by a
> separated field. This patch adds a "net_status" field for this purpose.
>
> Fixes: e9efa4d93821 ("net/virtio-user: add new virtual PCI driver")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
As discussed off-list, I will add Adrian's signn-off, as he also
proposed same patch earlier.
Thanks,
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management
2020-07-28 6:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management Xiao Wang
2020-07-28 7:45 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-07-28 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
@ 2020-07-28 15:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Coquelin @ 2020-07-28 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Wang; +Cc: dev, zhihong.wang, chenbo.xia, stable
On 7/28/20 8:52 AM, Xiao Wang wrote:
> Apart from the virtio status, there should be also a network related
> status for link status management, current implementation mixes up these
> two statuses.
>
> One issue caused by this mixup is when virtio-user running in server mode
> and vhost as a client connects to it, a RARP packet will be generated by
> virtio-user due to VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE bit is detected in the "status"
> in interrupt handler.
>
> VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE should be managed by a
> separated field. This patch adds a "net_status" field for this purpose.
>
> Fixes: e9efa4d93821 ("net/virtio-user: add new virtual PCI driver")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user_ethdev.c | 10 +++++-----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/master
Thanks,
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-28 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-28 6:52 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: fix virtio net status management Xiao Wang
2020-07-28 7:45 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-07-28 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-07-28 15:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.