[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Eliseo Martínez]

Hi, 

I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
Are there plans to update these?

Thanks, 
Eliseo Mart?nez.

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Julia Lawall]

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
> Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
> Are there plans to update these?

I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix 
it by Monday.

thanks,
julia

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Eliseo Martínez]

Ok, thanks.
I?ll keep an eye on that.

> On 29 Apr 2015, at 21:16, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:
> 
>> Hi, 
>> 
>> I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
>> Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
>> Are there plans to update these?
> 
> I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix 
> it by Monday.
> 
> thanks,
> julia

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Hello Julia,

On 04/29/2015 09:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:
> 
>> Hi, 
>>
>> I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
>> Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
>> Are there plans to update these?
> 
> I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix 
> it by Monday.
I found a whitespace placement "regression" too. But I didn't get the
time yet to create a simple test case for that. Are you interested in
that too? I can do it only tonight as I have it on my home desktop only.

bye
	michael

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Julia Lawall]

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:

> Hello Julia,
>
> On 04/29/2015 09:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
> >> Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
> >> Are there plans to update these?
> >
> > I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix
> > it by Monday.
> I found a whitespace placement "regression" too. But I didn't get the
> time yet to create a simple test case for that. Are you interested in
> that too? I can do it only tonight as I have it on my home desktop only.

Yes, please.  Tonight is competely fine.

As a side note, the previous release contained improved regression testing
for whitespace problems, so I hope that in the future the handling of
whitespace will only improve...

julia

[Cocci] Fiddling with whitespace in SmPL

[SF Markus Elfring]

> As a side note, the previous release contained improved regression testing
> for whitespace problems, so I hope that in the future the handling of
> whitespace will only improve...

Will corresponding software development challenges evolve also around a
feature request like "Make change influence configurable for coding
style rules"?
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/37

Regards,
Markus

[Cocci] Fiddling with whitespace in SmPL

[Julia Lawall]

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > As a side note, the previous release contained improved regression testing
> > for whitespace problems, so I hope that in the future the handling of
> > whitespace will only improve...
>
> Will corresponding software development challenges evolve also around a
> feature request like "Make change influence configurable for coding
> style rules"?
> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/37

Not likely soon.  You can use --smpl-spacing to control the spacing of
generated code within a line.

julia

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Eugeniy Meshcheryakov]

Hello Julia,

29 ?????? 2015 ? 21:16 +0200 Julia Lawall ???????(-??):
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:
> > I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
> > Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
> > Are there plans to update these?
> 
> I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix 
> it by Monday.
I've packaged version 1.0.0-rc24 for Debian recently. Would packaging
1.0.0 be a regression compared to -rc24? Or should I go ahead and
package it?

Regards,
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/attachments/20150526/55a124f0/attachment.asc>

[Cocci] Packages for release 1.0.0

[Julia Lawall]

On Tue, 26 May 2015, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:

> Hello Julia,
> 
> 29 ?????? 2015 ? 21:16 +0200 Julia Lawall ???????(-??):
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Eliseo Mart?nez wrote:
> > > I?ve seen release 1.0.0 has been published recently. Congrats!
> > > Unfortunately, it seems distribution packages (at least those for Ubuntu) are still stuck on 1.0.0-rc23 (Oct 2014).
> > > Are there plans to update these?
> > 
> > I could ping them, but I have already found a bug.  I'll see if I can fix 
> > it by Monday.
> I've packaged version 1.0.0-rc24 for Debian recently. Would packaging
> 1.0.0 be a regression compared to -rc24? Or should I go ahead and
> package it?

1.0.0 would be an improvement.  I don't think that the problem was a 
regressin as compared to rc24.  Thanks.

julia