* [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-05 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, oleg,
sasha.levin, pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory,
kernel mailing list
>From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
get_unmapped_area()
Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
- unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
- unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
-
unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
+
if (error)
return error;
@@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
if (len> TASK_SIZE)
return -ENOMEM;
- get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
- get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
- addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
+ addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
+ else
+ addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
return addr;
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-05 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, oleg,
sasha.levin, pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory,
kernel mailing list
>From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
get_unmapped_area()
Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
- unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
- unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
-
unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
+
if (error)
return error;
@@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
if (len> TASK_SIZE)
return -ENOMEM;
- get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
- get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
- addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
+ addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
+ else
+ addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
return addr;
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
@ 2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2015-09-07 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Gang
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, sasha.levin,
pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory, kernel mailing list
On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is subjective you know ;)
I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
I leave this to you and maintainers.
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2015-09-07 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Gang
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, sasha.levin,
pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory, kernel mailing list
On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is subjective you know ;)
I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
I leave this to you and maintainers.
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
[not found] ` <55EEEC18.10101@hotmail.com>
@ 2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-08 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: oleg
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, sasha.levin,
pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory, kernel mailing list
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 2502 bytes --]
On 9/7/15 20:41, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
>> get_unmapped_area()
>>
>> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This is subjective you know ;)
>
Oh, sorry. The comments need be improved.
> I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
> more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
>
> I leave this to you and maintainers.
>
OK, I can understand, every members have their own taste (my taste is
if one buffering variable is used within 2 times, I want to remove it).
For optimization, the original code maybe be a little better.
So for me, if more than 20% members still like the original code, we
should keep the original code no touch.
Thanks.
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
>> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
>> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
>> -
>> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
>> +
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>>
>> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
>> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
>> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
>> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
>> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
>> + pgoff, flags);
>> + else
>> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
>> + pgoff, flags);
>> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
>> return addr;
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>>
>>
>
--
Chen Gang (³Â¸Õ)
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-08 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: oleg
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, sasha.levin,
pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory, kernel mailing list
On 9/7/15 20:41, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 09/05, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
>> get_unmapped_area()
>>
>> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This is subjective you know ;)
>
Oh, sorry. The comments need be improved.
> I guess the author of this code added this variable to make the code
> more readable. And to me it becomes less readable after your change.
>
> I leave this to you and maintainers.
>
OK, I can understand, every members have their own taste (my taste is
if one buffering variable is used within 2 times, I want to remove it).
For optimization, the original code maybe be a little better.
So for me, if more than 20% members still like the original code, we
should keep the original code no touch.
Thanks.
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
>> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
>> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
>> -
>> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
>> +
>> if (error)
>> return error;
>>
>> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
>> if (len> TASK_SIZE)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
>> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
>> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
>> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
>> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
>> + pgoff, flags);
>> + else
>> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
>> + pgoff, flags);
>> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
>> return addr;
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>>
>>
>
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
@ 2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2015-09-08 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Gang
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, oleg,
sasha.levin, pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory,
kernel mailing list
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: David Rientjes @ 2015-09-08 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chen Gang
Cc: Andrew Morton, kirill.shutemov, riel, Michal Hocko, oleg,
sasha.levin, pfeiner, aarcange, vishnu.ps, Linux Memory,
kernel mailing list
On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> From a1bf4726f71d6d0394b41309944646fc806a8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 21:51:08 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in
> get_unmapped_area()
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-11 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, gang.chen.5i5j; +Cc: mhocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 9/11/15 06:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:14:51 +0800 gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com wrote:
>
> size(1) says this generates more object code. And that probably means
> slightly worse code. I didn't investigate, but probably the compiler
> is now preparing those five args at two different sites.
>
> Which is pretty dumb of it - the compiler could have stacked the args
> first, then chosen the appropriate function to call.
>
For get_unmapped_area() under x86_64, all 5 args are in registers, also
file->f_op->get_unmapped_area and current->mm->get_unmapped_area args
are same as get_unmapped_area(), which called directly (no new insns).
For me I am not quite sure which performance is better (So originally,
I said, "if orig code has a bit better performance, also if more than
20% taste orig code simple enough, we can keep it no touch").
- New size is a little smaller than orig size.
- But new insns is a little more than orig insns (x86_64 is not fix
wide insns).
For me, I guess, new code is a bit better than orig code: for normal
sequence insns, 'size' is more important than insns count (at least, it
is more clearer than insns count).
The related dump (build by gcc6):
[root@localhost mm]# size mmap.new.o
text data bss dec hex filename
17597 266 40 17903 45ef mmap.new.o
[root@localhost mm]# size mmap.orig.o
text data bss dec hex filename
17613 266 40 17919 45ff mmap.orig.o
objdump for mmap.orig.s:
00000000000004d0 <get_unmapped_area>:
4d0: 55 push %rbp
4d1: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
4d8: 00 00
4da: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4dd: 41 54 push %r12
4df: 53 push %rbx
4e0: 4c 8b 88 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%r9
4e7: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
4ee: 7f 00 00
4f1: 41 f7 c1 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%r9d
4f8: 74 1f je 519 <get_unmapped_area+0x49>
4fa: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
501: 00 00
503: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
50a: 41 b9 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%r9d
510: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
515: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
519: 48 39 d0 cmp %rdx,%rax
51c: 73 0f jae 52d <get_unmapped_area+0x5d>
51e: 48 c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffffffffff4,%rbx
525: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
528: 5b pop %rbx
529: 41 5c pop %r12
52b: 5d pop %rbp
52c: c3 retq
52d: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
534: 00 00
536: 48 8b 80 68 03 00 00 mov 0x368(%rax),%rax
53d: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi
540: 4c 8b 48 18 mov 0x18(%rax),%r9
544: 0f 84 82 00 00 00 je 5cc <get_unmapped_area+0xfc>
54a: 48 8b 47 28 mov 0x28(%rdi),%rax
54e: 48 8b 80 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%rax),%rax
555: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
558: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
55c: 49 89 d4 mov %rdx,%r12
55f: ff d0 callq *%rax
561: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
567: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
56a: 77 b9 ja 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
56c: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
573: 00 00
575: 48 8b 90 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%rdx
57c: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
583: 7f 00 00
586: f7 c2 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%edx
58c: 74 1e je 5ac <get_unmapped_area+0xdc>
58e: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
595: 00 00
597: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
59e: ba 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%edx
5a3: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
5a8: 48 0f 44 c2 cmove %rdx,%rax
5ac: 4c 29 e0 sub %r12,%rax
5af: 48 39 c3 cmp %rax,%rbx
5b2: 0f 87 66 ff ff ff ja 51e <get_unmapped_area+0x4e>
5b8: f7 c3 ff 0f 00 00 test $0xfff,%ebx
5be: 74 11 je 5d1 <get_unmapped_area+0x101>
5c0: 48 c7 c3 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffea,%rbx
5c7: e9 59 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5cc: 4c 89 c8 mov %r9,%rax
5cf: eb 8b jmp 55c <get_unmapped_area+0x8c>
5d1: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
5d4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 5d9 <get_unmapped_area+0x109>
5d9: 48 98 cltq
5db: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
5de: 48 0f 45 d8 cmovne %rax,%rbx
5e2: e9 3e ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5e7: 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
5ee: 00 00
objdump for mmap.new.s
00000000000004d0 <get_unmapped_area>:
4d0: 55 push %rbp
4d1: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
4d8: 00 00
4da: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4dd: 41 54 push %r12
4df: 53 push %rbx
4e0: 4c 8b 88 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%r9
4e7: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
4ee: 7f 00 00
4f1: 41 f7 c1 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%r9d
4f8: 74 1f je 519 <get_unmapped_area+0x49>
4fa: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
501: 00 00
503: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
50a: 41 b9 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%r9d
510: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
515: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
519: 48 39 d0 cmp %rdx,%rax
51c: 73 0f jae 52d <get_unmapped_area+0x5d>
51e: 48 c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffffffffff4,%rbx
525: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
528: 5b pop %rbx
529: 41 5c pop %r12
52b: 5d pop %rbp
52c: c3 retq
52d: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi
530: 49 89 d4 mov %rdx,%r12
533: 74 7a je 5af <get_unmapped_area+0xdf>
535: 48 8b 47 28 mov 0x28(%rdi),%rax
539: 48 8b 80 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%rax),%rax
540: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
543: 74 6a je 5af <get_unmapped_area+0xdf>
545: ff d0 callq *%rax
547: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
54a: 48 81 fb 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rbx
551: 77 d2 ja 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
553: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
55a: 00 00
55c: 48 8b 90 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%rdx
563: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
56a: 7f 00 00
56d: f7 c2 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%edx
573: 74 1e je 593 <get_unmapped_area+0xc3>
575: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
57c: 00 00
57e: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
585: ba 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%edx
58a: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
58f: 48 0f 44 c2 cmove %rdx,%rax
593: 4c 29 e0 sub %r12,%rax
596: 48 39 c3 cmp %rax,%rbx
599: 77 83 ja 51e <get_unmapped_area+0x4e>
59b: f7 c3 ff 0f 00 00 test $0xfff,%ebx
5a1: 74 27 je 5ca <get_unmapped_area+0xfa>
5a3: 48 c7 c3 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffea,%rbx
5aa: e9 76 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5af: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
5b6: 00 00
5b8: 48 8b 80 68 03 00 00 mov 0x368(%rax),%rax
5bf: 4c 89 e2 mov %r12,%rdx
5c2: ff 50 18 callq *0x18(%rax)
5c5: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
5c8: eb 80 jmp 54a <get_unmapped_area+0x7a>
5ca: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
5cd: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 5d2 <get_unmapped_area+0x102>
5d2: 48 98 cltq
5d4: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
5d7: 48 0f 45 d8 cmovne %rax,%rbx
5db: e9 45 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Chen Gang @ 2015-09-11 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, gang.chen.5i5j; +Cc: mhocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On 9/11/15 06:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:14:51 +0800 gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com wrote:
>
> size(1) says this generates more object code. And that probably means
> slightly worse code. I didn't investigate, but probably the compiler
> is now preparing those five args at two different sites.
>
> Which is pretty dumb of it - the compiler could have stacked the args
> first, then chosen the appropriate function to call.
>
For get_unmapped_area() under x86_64, all 5 args are in registers, also
file->f_op->get_unmapped_area and current->mm->get_unmapped_area args
are same as get_unmapped_area(), which called directly (no new insns).
For me I am not quite sure which performance is better (So originally,
I said, "if orig code has a bit better performance, also if more than
20% taste orig code simple enough, we can keep it no touch").
- New size is a little smaller than orig size.
- But new insns is a little more than orig insns (x86_64 is not fix
wide insns).
For me, I guess, new code is a bit better than orig code: for normal
sequence insns, 'size' is more important than insns count (at least, it
is more clearer than insns count).
The related dump (build by gcc6):
[root@localhost mm]# size mmap.new.o
text data bss dec hex filename
17597 266 40 17903 45ef mmap.new.o
[root@localhost mm]# size mmap.orig.o
text data bss dec hex filename
17613 266 40 17919 45ff mmap.orig.o
objdump for mmap.orig.s:
00000000000004d0 <get_unmapped_area>:
4d0: 55 push %rbp
4d1: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
4d8: 00 00
4da: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4dd: 41 54 push %r12
4df: 53 push %rbx
4e0: 4c 8b 88 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%r9
4e7: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
4ee: 7f 00 00
4f1: 41 f7 c1 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%r9d
4f8: 74 1f je 519 <get_unmapped_area+0x49>
4fa: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
501: 00 00
503: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
50a: 41 b9 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%r9d
510: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
515: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
519: 48 39 d0 cmp %rdx,%rax
51c: 73 0f jae 52d <get_unmapped_area+0x5d>
51e: 48 c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffffffffff4,%rbx
525: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
528: 5b pop %rbx
529: 41 5c pop %r12
52b: 5d pop %rbp
52c: c3 retq
52d: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
534: 00 00
536: 48 8b 80 68 03 00 00 mov 0x368(%rax),%rax
53d: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi
540: 4c 8b 48 18 mov 0x18(%rax),%r9
544: 0f 84 82 00 00 00 je 5cc <get_unmapped_area+0xfc>
54a: 48 8b 47 28 mov 0x28(%rdi),%rax
54e: 48 8b 80 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%rax),%rax
555: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
558: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
55c: 49 89 d4 mov %rdx,%r12
55f: ff d0 callq *%rax
561: 48 3d 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax
567: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
56a: 77 b9 ja 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
56c: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
573: 00 00
575: 48 8b 90 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%rdx
57c: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
583: 7f 00 00
586: f7 c2 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%edx
58c: 74 1e je 5ac <get_unmapped_area+0xdc>
58e: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
595: 00 00
597: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
59e: ba 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%edx
5a3: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
5a8: 48 0f 44 c2 cmove %rdx,%rax
5ac: 4c 29 e0 sub %r12,%rax
5af: 48 39 c3 cmp %rax,%rbx
5b2: 0f 87 66 ff ff ff ja 51e <get_unmapped_area+0x4e>
5b8: f7 c3 ff 0f 00 00 test $0xfff,%ebx
5be: 74 11 je 5d1 <get_unmapped_area+0x101>
5c0: 48 c7 c3 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffea,%rbx
5c7: e9 59 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5cc: 4c 89 c8 mov %r9,%rax
5cf: eb 8b jmp 55c <get_unmapped_area+0x8c>
5d1: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
5d4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 5d9 <get_unmapped_area+0x109>
5d9: 48 98 cltq
5db: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
5de: 48 0f 45 d8 cmovne %rax,%rbx
5e2: e9 3e ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5e7: 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
5ee: 00 00
objdump for mmap.new.s
00000000000004d0 <get_unmapped_area>:
4d0: 55 push %rbp
4d1: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
4d8: 00 00
4da: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4dd: 41 54 push %r12
4df: 53 push %rbx
4e0: 4c 8b 88 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%r9
4e7: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
4ee: 7f 00 00
4f1: 41 f7 c1 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%r9d
4f8: 74 1f je 519 <get_unmapped_area+0x49>
4fa: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
501: 00 00
503: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
50a: 41 b9 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%r9d
510: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
515: 49 0f 44 c1 cmove %r9,%rax
519: 48 39 d0 cmp %rdx,%rax
51c: 73 0f jae 52d <get_unmapped_area+0x5d>
51e: 48 c7 c3 f4 ff ff ff mov $0xfffffffffffffff4,%rbx
525: 48 89 d8 mov %rbx,%rax
528: 5b pop %rbx
529: 41 5c pop %r12
52b: 5d pop %rbp
52c: c3 retq
52d: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi
530: 49 89 d4 mov %rdx,%r12
533: 74 7a je 5af <get_unmapped_area+0xdf>
535: 48 8b 47 28 mov 0x28(%rdi),%rax
539: 48 8b 80 98 00 00 00 mov 0x98(%rax),%rax
540: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
543: 74 6a je 5af <get_unmapped_area+0xdf>
545: ff d0 callq *%rax
547: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
54a: 48 81 fb 00 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff000,%rbx
551: 77 d2 ja 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
553: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
55a: 00 00
55c: 48 8b 90 08 c0 ff ff mov -0x3ff8(%rax),%rdx
563: 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff movabs $0x7ffffffff000,%rax
56a: 7f 00 00
56d: f7 c2 00 00 00 20 test $0x20000000,%edx
573: 74 1e je 593 <get_unmapped_area+0xc3>
575: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
57c: 00 00
57e: f6 80 cb 03 00 00 08 testb $0x8,0x3cb(%rax)
585: ba 00 e0 ff ff mov $0xffffe000,%edx
58a: b8 00 00 00 c0 mov $0xc0000000,%eax
58f: 48 0f 44 c2 cmove %rdx,%rax
593: 4c 29 e0 sub %r12,%rax
596: 48 39 c3 cmp %rax,%rbx
599: 77 83 ja 51e <get_unmapped_area+0x4e>
59b: f7 c3 ff 0f 00 00 test $0xfff,%ebx
5a1: 74 27 je 5ca <get_unmapped_area+0xfa>
5a3: 48 c7 c3 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffea,%rbx
5aa: e9 76 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
5af: 65 48 8b 04 25 00 00 mov %gs:0x0,%rax
5b6: 00 00
5b8: 48 8b 80 68 03 00 00 mov 0x368(%rax),%rax
5bf: 4c 89 e2 mov %r12,%rdx
5c2: ff 50 18 callq *0x18(%rax)
5c5: 48 89 c3 mov %rax,%rbx
5c8: eb 80 jmp 54a <get_unmapped_area+0x7a>
5ca: 48 89 df mov %rbx,%rdi
5cd: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 5d2 <get_unmapped_area+0x102>
5d2: 48 98 cltq
5d4: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
5d7: 48 0f 45 d8 cmovne %rax,%rbx
5db: e9 45 ff ff ff jmpq 525 <get_unmapped_area+0x55>
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
2015-09-03 4:14 gang.chen.5i5j
@ 2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2015-09-10 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gang.chen.5i5j; +Cc: mhocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel, gchen_5i5j
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:14:51 +0800 gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len > TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
size(1) says this generates more object code. And that probably means
slightly worse code. I didn't investigate, but probably the compiler
is now preparing those five args at two different sites.
Which is pretty dumb of it - the compiler could have stacked the args
first, then chosen the appropriate function to call.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2015-09-10 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gang.chen.5i5j; +Cc: mhocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel, gchen_5i5j
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:14:51 +0800 gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>
> Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
> get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> {
> - unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
> - unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
> -
> unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
> +
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> @@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
> if (len > TASK_SIZE)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
> if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
> - get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
> - addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
> + addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> + else
> + addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
> + pgoff, flags);
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> return addr;
size(1) says this generates more object code. And that probably means
slightly worse code. I didn't investigate, but probably the compiler
is now preparing those five args at two different sites.
Which is pretty dumb of it - the compiler could have stacked the args
first, then chosen the appropriate function to call.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area()
@ 2015-09-03 4:14 gang.chen.5i5j
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: gang.chen.5i5j @ 2015-09-03 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, mhocko; +Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, gchen_5i5j, Chen Gang
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Call the function pointer directly, then let code a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
mm/mmap.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 4db7cf0..39fd727 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2012,10 +2012,8 @@ unsigned long
get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
{
- unsigned long (*get_area)(struct file *, unsigned long,
- unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long);
-
unsigned long error = arch_mmap_check(addr, len, flags);
+
if (error)
return error;
@@ -2023,10 +2021,12 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, unsigned long addr, unsigned long len,
if (len > TASK_SIZE)
return -ENOMEM;
- get_area = current->mm->get_unmapped_area;
if (file && file->f_op->get_unmapped_area)
- get_area = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area;
- addr = get_area(file, addr, len, pgoff, flags);
+ addr = file->f_op->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
+ else
+ addr = current->mm->get_unmapped_area(file, addr, len,
+ pgoff, flags);
if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
return addr;
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-11 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-05 14:09 [PATCH] mm/mmap.c: Remove redundent 'get_area' function pointer in get_unmapped_area() Chen Gang
2015-09-05 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-09-07 12:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
[not found] ` <55EEEC18.10101@hotmail.com>
2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-08 14:09 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
2015-09-08 23:23 ` David Rientjes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-03 4:14 gang.chen.5i5j
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-10 22:32 ` Andrew Morton
2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
2015-09-11 23:52 ` Chen Gang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.