Re: [PATCH v5 11/25] xen/arm: introduce allocate_memory

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 23/10/2018 03:02, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Introduce an allocate_memory function able to allocate memory for DomUs
> > and map it at the right guest addresses, according to the guest memory
> > map: GUEST_RAM0_BASE and GUEST_RAM1_BASE.
> > 
> > This is under #if 0 as not used for now.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5:
> > - improve commit message
> > - code style
> > - remove unneeded local var
> > - while loop in allocate_bank_memory to allocate memory so that it
> >    doesn't have to be contiguos
> > - combile while loops in allocate_memory
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - move earlier, add #if 0
> > - introduce allocate_bank_memory, remove insert_bank
> > - allocate_bank_memory allocate memory and inserts the bank, while
> >    allocate_memory specifies where to do that
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - new patch
> > ---
> >   xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 99
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > index c61a27f..146d81e 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> > @@ -368,6 +368,105 @@ static void __init allocate_memory_11(struct domain
> > *d,
> >       }
> >   }
> >   +#if 0
> > +static bool __init allocate_bank_memory(struct domain *d,
> > +                                        struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> > +                                        gfn_t sgfn,
> > +                                        unsigned int order)
> 
> I don't think your implementation below is equivalent to the one I suggested
> earlier on ([1]). While you handled the contiguous problem, you didn't address
> the 2 others points:
>        1) The memory specify by the user may not be in power of 2 pages. For
> instance, a user can specify 40KB. With your algo, we will end to
> allocate 32KB in the first bank and 8KB in the second bank. However what
> we want is allocate 40KB in a single bank.
>        2) You don't check whether the leftover memory is bigger than the size
> of the second bank.
> 
> Because of 1), you can't reason in term of order here. You have to reason in
> bytes or number of pages.
> 
> > +{
> > +    int res;
> > +    struct page_info *pg;
> > +    struct membank *bank;
> > +    paddr_t size = pfn_to_paddr(1UL << order);
> > +    gfn_t _sgfn = sgfn;
> > +    gfn_t _egfn = gfn_add(sgfn, 1UL << order);
> > +
> > +    while ( gfn_x(_sgfn) < gfn_x(_egfn) )
> > +    {
> > +        pg = alloc_domheap_pages(d, order, 0);
> > +        if ( pg != NULL )
> > +        {
> > +            res = guest_physmap_add_page(d, _sgfn, page_to_mfn(pg), order);
> > +            if ( res )
> > +            {
> > +                dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Failed map pages to DOMU: %d", res);
> > +                goto fail;
> > +            }
> > +            _sgfn = gfn_add(_sgfn, 1UL << order);
> > +        }
> > +        else
> > +        {
> > +            order--;
> 
> order may be equal to 0. So here you will underflow.
> 
> Overall, it would be best if you re-use the code I sent. While not tested, it
> addresses all the problems. Fixing the potential bug in that patch so be quite
> easily.

OK, I'll add your Signed-off-by to the patch.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel