All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/mm/pageattr: Ensure cpa->pfn only contains page frame numbers
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:19:01 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511162010120.3761@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447538451-5793-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Matt Fleming wrote:
> The x86 pageattr code is confused about the data that is stored
> cpa->pfn, sometimes it's treated as a page frame number, sometimes
> it's treated as an unshifted physical address, and in one place it's
> treated as a pte.

Yuck.
 
> The result of this is that the mapping functions do not map the
> intended physical address.
> 
> This isn't a problem in practice because most of the addresses we're
> mapping in the EFI code paths are already mapped in 'trampoline_pgd'
> and so the pageattr mappings functions don't actually do anything in
> this case. But when we move to using a separate page table for the EFI
> runtime this will be an issue.

Are you sure that this does not affect existing kernel versions?

>  	while (num_pages-- && start < end) {
> -
> -		/* deal with the NX bit */
> -		if (!(pgprot_val(pgprot) & _PAGE_NX))
> -			cpa->pfn &= ~_PAGE_NX;

That should be a seperate patch because this is just bogus code and
has nothing to do with the pfn confusion.

> -
> -		set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(cpa->pfn >> PAGE_SHIFT, pgprot));
> +		set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(cpa->pfn, pgprot));

> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index a0ac0f9c307f..c8b58ac47b77 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void efi_sync_low_kernel_mappings(void)
>  
>  int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  {
> -	unsigned long text;
> +	unsigned long pfn, text;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	unsigned npages;
>  	pgd_t *pgd;
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  	 * and ident-map those pages containing the map before calling
>  	 * phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map().
>  	 */
> -	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pa_memmap, pa_memmap, num_pages, _PAGE_NX)) {
> +	pfn = pa_memmap >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, pa_memmap, num_pages, _PAGE_NX)) {
>  		pr_err("Error ident-mapping new memmap (0x%lx)!\n", pa_memmap);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> @@ -176,21 +177,29 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	npages = (_end - _text) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

You really need to PFN_ALIGN _end and _text. Has been wrong in the
existing code as well.

> +	text = __pa(_text);
> +	pfn = text >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, text, npages, 0)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to map kernel text 1:1\n");
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_DMA32);
>  	if (!page)
>  		panic("Unable to allocate EFI runtime stack < 4GB\n");
>  
>  	efi_scratch.phys_stack = virt_to_phys(page_address(page));
> -	efi_scratch.phys_stack += PAGE_SIZE; /* stack grows down */
> -
> -	npages = (_end - _text) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	text = __pa(_text);
> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>  
> -	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, text >> PAGE_SHIFT, text, npages, 0)) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to map kernel text 1:1\n");
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, efi_scratch.phys_stack, 1, 0)) {

This looks like an unrelated change, hmm?

> +		pr_err("Failed to map mixed mode stack\n");
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  
> +	efi_scratch.phys_stack += PAGE_SIZE; /* stack grows down */
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Thanks,

	tglx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya
	<sai.praneeth.prakhya-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/mm/pageattr: Ensure cpa->pfn only contains page frame numbers
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:19:01 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1511162010120.3761@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447538451-5793-2-git-send-email-matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015, Matt Fleming wrote:
> The x86 pageattr code is confused about the data that is stored
> cpa->pfn, sometimes it's treated as a page frame number, sometimes
> it's treated as an unshifted physical address, and in one place it's
> treated as a pte.

Yuck.
 
> The result of this is that the mapping functions do not map the
> intended physical address.
> 
> This isn't a problem in practice because most of the addresses we're
> mapping in the EFI code paths are already mapped in 'trampoline_pgd'
> and so the pageattr mappings functions don't actually do anything in
> this case. But when we move to using a separate page table for the EFI
> runtime this will be an issue.

Are you sure that this does not affect existing kernel versions?

>  	while (num_pages-- && start < end) {
> -
> -		/* deal with the NX bit */
> -		if (!(pgprot_val(pgprot) & _PAGE_NX))
> -			cpa->pfn &= ~_PAGE_NX;

That should be a seperate patch because this is just bogus code and
has nothing to do with the pfn confusion.

> -
> -		set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(cpa->pfn >> PAGE_SHIFT, pgprot));
> +		set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(cpa->pfn, pgprot));

> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index a0ac0f9c307f..c8b58ac47b77 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ void efi_sync_low_kernel_mappings(void)
>  
>  int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  {
> -	unsigned long text;
> +	unsigned long pfn, text;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	unsigned npages;
>  	pgd_t *pgd;
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  	 * and ident-map those pages containing the map before calling
>  	 * phys_efi_set_virtual_address_map().
>  	 */
> -	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pa_memmap, pa_memmap, num_pages, _PAGE_NX)) {
> +	pfn = pa_memmap >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, pa_memmap, num_pages, _PAGE_NX)) {
>  		pr_err("Error ident-mapping new memmap (0x%lx)!\n", pa_memmap);
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> @@ -176,21 +177,29 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
>  	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	npages = (_end - _text) >> PAGE_SHIFT;

You really need to PFN_ALIGN _end and _text. Has been wrong in the
existing code as well.

> +	text = __pa(_text);
> +	pfn = text >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, text, npages, 0)) {
> +		pr_err("Failed to map kernel text 1:1\n");
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +
>  	page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_DMA32);
>  	if (!page)
>  		panic("Unable to allocate EFI runtime stack < 4GB\n");
>  
>  	efi_scratch.phys_stack = virt_to_phys(page_address(page));
> -	efi_scratch.phys_stack += PAGE_SIZE; /* stack grows down */
> -
> -	npages = (_end - _text) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	text = __pa(_text);
> +	pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>  
> -	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, text >> PAGE_SHIFT, text, npages, 0)) {
> -		pr_err("Failed to map kernel text 1:1\n");
> +	if (kernel_map_pages_in_pgd(pgd, pfn, efi_scratch.phys_stack, 1, 0)) {

This looks like an unrelated change, hmm?

> +		pr_err("Failed to map mixed mode stack\n");
>  		return 1;
>  	}
>  
> +	efi_scratch.phys_stack += PAGE_SIZE; /* stack grows down */
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Thanks,

	tglx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-16 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-14 22:00 [GIT PULL v2 0/5] EFI page table isolation Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/mm/pageattr: Ensure cpa->pfn only contains page frame numbers Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00   ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-16 15:56   ` Dave Hansen
2015-11-16 15:56     ` Dave Hansen
2015-11-17  9:44     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-17  9:44       ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-16 20:19   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-11-16 20:19     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-16 21:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-16 21:48       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-16 21:48         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-17  8:50         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-17  8:50           ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-17  9:45     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-17  9:45       ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-18  8:14       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18  8:14         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-20 12:01         ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-20 12:01           ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed mode Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00   ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/efi: Hoist page table switching code into efi_call_virt() Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00   ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00   ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] Documentation/x86: Update EFI memory region description Matt Fleming
2015-11-14 22:00   ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1511162010120.3761@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.