All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:57:42 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610261650260.4983@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161026141359.GA6893@redhat.com>

On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Some notes right now. Of course, with this patch we are ready to remove
> put_task_stack() from kthread.c right now. The next change should kill
> to_live_kthread() altogether. And stop using ->vfork_done.
> 
> And. With this patch we do not need another "workqueue: ignore dead tasks
> in a workqueue sleep hook" fix from Roman.

Nice !
 
> diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
> index be2cc1f..c6adbde 100644
> --- a/kernel/kthread.c
> +++ b/kernel/kthread.c
> @@ -53,14 +53,34 @@ enum KTHREAD_BITS {
>  	KTHREAD_IS_PARKED,
>  };
>  
> -#define __to_kthread(vfork)	\
> -	container_of(vfork, struct kthread, exited)
> +static inline void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * We abuse ->set_child_tid to avoid the new member and because it
> +	 * can't be wrongly copied by copy_process(). We also rely on fact
> +	 * that the caller can't exec, so PF_KTHREAD can't be cleared.
> +	 */
> +	current->set_child_tid = (__force void __user *)kthread;

Can we pretty please avoid this type casting? We only have 5 places using
set_child_tid. So we can really make it a proper union and fix up the 5
usage sites as a preparatory patch for this.

> +}
>  
>  static inline struct kthread *to_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
>  {
> -	return __to_kthread(k->vfork_done);
> +	WARN_ON(!(k->flags & PF_KTHREAD));
> +	return (__force void *)k->set_child_tid;
>  }
>  
> +void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *k)
> +{
> +	kfree(to_kthread(k)); /* can be NULL if kmalloc() failed */

Can you please not use tail comments? They really stop the reading flow.

> +#define __to_kthread(vfork)	\
> +	container_of(vfork, struct kthread, exited)
> +
> +/*
> + * TODO: kill it and use to_kthread(). But we still need the users
> + * like kthread_stop() which has to sync with the exiting kthread.
> + */
>  static struct kthread *to_live_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
>  {
>  	struct completion *vfork = ACCESS_ONCE(k->vfork_done);
> @@ -181,14 +201,11 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  	int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
>  	void *data = create->data;
>  	struct completion *done;
> -	struct kthread self;
> +	struct kthread *self;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	self.flags = 0;
> -	self.data = data;
> -	init_completion(&self.exited);
> -	init_completion(&self.parked);
> -	current->vfork_done = &self.exited;
> +	self = kmalloc(sizeof(*self), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	set_kthread_struct(self);
>  
>  	/* If user was SIGKILLed, I release the structure. */
>  	done = xchg(&create->done, NULL);
> @@ -196,6 +213,19 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  		kfree(create);
>  		do_exit(-EINTR);
>  	}
> +
> +	if (!self) {
> +		create->result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		complete(done);
> +		do_exit(-ENOMEM);
> +	}
> +
> +	self->flags = 0;
> +	self->data = data;
> +	init_completion(&self->exited);
> +	init_completion(&self->parked);
> +	current->vfork_done = &self->exited;
> +
>  	/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
>  	__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  	create->result = current;
> @@ -203,12 +233,10 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
>  	schedule();
>  
>  	ret = -EINTR;
> -
> -	if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self.flags)) {
> -		__kthread_parkme(&self);
> +	if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
> +		__kthread_parkme(self);
>  		ret = threadfn(data);
>  	}
> -	/* we can't just return, we must preserve "self" on stack */
>  	do_exit(ret);
>  }

Other than the above nits, this is the right direction to go.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-26 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-25 11:05 [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc Roman Pen
2016-10-25 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 15:43   ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 16:08     ` Roman Penyaev
2016-10-25 16:17       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 16:52     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-26 14:14       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-26 14:57         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-26 15:51           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-26 18:31             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 16:11               ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: make struct kthread kmalloc'ed Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 16:11                 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 18:48                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 16:12                 ` [PATCH 2/2] Revert "kthread: Pin the stack via try_get_task_stack()/put_task_stack() in to_live_kthread() function" Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-28 18:49                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 18:44                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: make struct kthread kmalloc'ed Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-31 20:07                 ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: kill to_live_kthread() Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-31 20:07                   ` [PATCH 1/2] kthread: don't use to_live_kthread() in kthread_stop() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-09  7:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-31 20:08                   ` [PATCH 2/2] kthread: don't use to_live_kthread() in kthread_park() and kthread_unpark() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-09  8:45                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-09 17:27                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-10 17:19                         ` [PATCH 0/1] kthread: don't abuse kthread_create_on_cpu() in __kthread_create_worker() Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-10 17:20                           ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2016-11-14 11:12                             ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-14 11:09                           ` [PATCH 0/1] " Petr Mladek
2016-11-07 18:23                   ` [PATCH 0/2] kthread: kill to_live_kthread() Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-26 16:13         ` [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using kmalloc Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-27  2:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-27 13:10           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-10-25 15:46   ` Roman Penyaev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610261650260.4983@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.