All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Len Brown" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Safonov" <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>,
	"Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/9] x86/arch_prctl: Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:36:22 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703142112200.3770@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170311194702.28754-7-khuey@kylehuey.com>

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Kyle Huey wrote:
>  static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
>  	u64 msr;
>  
> +	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr))
> +		return;
> +
> +	msr = 0;
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, msr);
> +	this_cpu_write(msr_misc_features_shadow, msr);
> +
>  	if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, &msr)) {
>  		if (msr & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT)
>  			set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT);
>  	}
>  
>  	probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c);

The way you are doing it breaks the ring3 mwait feature because you
overwrite the R3MWAIT bit the first time you update the MSR on context
switch.

>  }

What you really want is to fixup the r3mwait part:

static void probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c)
{
	....
	if (ring3mwait_disabled)
		return;

	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_RING3MWAIT);
	this_cpu_or(msr_misc_features_shadow,
		    1UL << MSR_MISC_FEATURE_ENABLES_RING3MWAIT_BIT);

	if (c == &boot_cpu_data)
		ELF_HWCAP2 |= HWCAP2_RING3MWAIT;
}

and have a function for cpuid fault:

static void init_cpuid_fault(c)
{
  	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, &msr))
		return;
	if ((msr & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT))
		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT);
}

and then do:

static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
  	u64 msr;
  
	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr))
		return;

	/* Clear all MISC features */
	this_cpu_write(msr_misc_features_shadow, 0);

	/* Check the features and update the shadow control bits */
	init_cpuid_fault(c);
	probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c);

	msr_write(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_ENABLES,
		  this_cpu_read(msr_misc_features_shadow);
}

Hmm?

Thanks,

	tglx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	"Len Brown" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	"Dmitry Safonov" <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
	"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/9] x86/arch_prctl: Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:36:22 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703142112200.3770@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170311194702.28754-7-khuey@kylehuey.com>

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Kyle Huey wrote:
>  static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  {
>  	u64 msr;
>  
> +	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr))
> +		return;
> +
> +	msr = 0;
> +	wrmsrl(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, msr);
> +	this_cpu_write(msr_misc_features_shadow, msr);
> +
>  	if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, &msr)) {
>  		if (msr & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT)
>  			set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT);
>  	}
>  
>  	probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c);

The way you are doing it breaks the ring3 mwait feature because you
overwrite the R3MWAIT bit the first time you update the MSR on context
switch.

>  }

What you really want is to fixup the r3mwait part:

static void probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c)
{
	....
	if (ring3mwait_disabled)
		return;

	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_RING3MWAIT);
	this_cpu_or(msr_misc_features_shadow,
		    1UL << MSR_MISC_FEATURE_ENABLES_RING3MWAIT_BIT);

	if (c == &boot_cpu_data)
		ELF_HWCAP2 |= HWCAP2_RING3MWAIT;
}

and have a function for cpuid fault:

static void init_cpuid_fault(c)
{
  	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_PLATFORM_INFO, &msr))
		return;
	if ((msr & MSR_PLATFORM_INFO_CPUID_FAULT))
		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CPUID_FAULT);
}

and then do:

static void init_intel_misc_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
  	u64 msr;
  
	if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES, &msr))
		return;

	/* Clear all MISC features */
	this_cpu_write(msr_misc_features_shadow, 0);

	/* Check the features and update the shadow control bits */
	init_cpuid_fault(c);
	probe_xeon_phi_r3mwait(c);

	msr_write(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_ENABLES,
		  this_cpu_read(msr_misc_features_shadow);
}

Hmm?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-11 19:46 [PATCH v15 0/9] x86/arch_prctl Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID for controlling the CPUID instruction Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 1/9] x86/arch_prctl/64: Use SYSCALL_DEFINE2 to define sys_arch_prctl Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 2/9] x86/arch_prctl/64: Rename do_arch_prctl to do_arch_prctl_64 Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 3/9] x86/arch_prctl: Add do_arch_prctl_common Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 4/9] x86/syscalls/32: Wire up arch_prctl on x86-32 Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 5/9] x86/cpufeature: Detect CPUID faulting support Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46 ` [PATCH v15 6/9] x86/arch_prctl: Add ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:46   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-14 20:36   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-03-14 20:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-20  8:01     ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-20  8:01       ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-14 21:47   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-14 21:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-16 11:09     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-16 11:09       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-03-16 14:30       ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-16 14:30         ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-16 18:23         ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-16 18:23           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-03-17  7:56           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-17  7:56             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-03-11 19:47 ` [PATCH v15 7/9] x86/arch_prctl: Selftest for ARCH_[GET|SET]_CPUID Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:47   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:47 ` [PATCH v15 8/9] KVM: x86: virtualize cpuid faulting Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:47   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:47 ` [PATCH v15 9/9] x86/arch_prctl: Rename 'code' argument to 'option' Kyle Huey
2017-03-11 19:47   ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-14 20:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-14 20:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-20  8:01     ` Kyle Huey
2017-03-20  8:01       ` Kyle Huey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1703142112200.3770@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=me@kylehuey.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert@ocallahan.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.