From: Christopher Lameter <cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel-wJa12IhQEiizQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>, linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <tst-0Nly+W1lFbFDiq0p6IFu4YQuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>, andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org, Rik van Riel <riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Guy Shattah <sguy-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Anshuman Khandual <khandual-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86-deATy8a+UHjQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>, David Nellans <dnellans-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Laura Abbott <labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] Protect larger order pages from breaking up Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:13:12 -0600 (CST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802161411440.11934@nuc-kabylake> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5108eb20-2b20-bd48-903e-bce312e96974-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > Well that f.e brings up huge pages. You can of course > > also use this to reserve those and can then be sure that > > you can dynamically resize your huge page pools even after > > a long time of system up time. > > Yes, and no. Doesn't that assume nobody else is doing allocations > of that size? For example, I could image THP using huge page sized > reservations. The when it comes time to resize your hugetlbfs pool > there may not be enough. Although, we may quickly split THP pages > in this case. I am not sure. Yup it has a pool for everyone. Question is how to divide the loot ;-) > IIRC, Guy Shattah's use case was for allocations greater than MAX_ORDER. > This would not directly address that. A huge contiguous area (2GB) is > the sweet spot' for best performance in his case. However, I think he > could still benefit from using a set of larger (such as 2MB) size > allocations which this scheme could help with. MAX_ORDER can be increased to allow for larger allocations. IA64 has f.e. a much larger MAX_ORDER size. So does powerpc. And then the reservation scheme will work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <tst@schoebel-theuer.de>, andi@firstfloor.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Guy Shattah <sguy@mellanox.com>, Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, David Nellans <dnellans@nvidia.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] Protect larger order pages from breaking up Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:13:12 -0600 (CST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802161411440.11934@nuc-kabylake> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5108eb20-2b20-bd48-903e-bce312e96974@oracle.com> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Mike Kravetz wrote: > > Well that f.e brings up huge pages. You can of course > > also use this to reserve those and can then be sure that > > you can dynamically resize your huge page pools even after > > a long time of system up time. > > Yes, and no. Doesn't that assume nobody else is doing allocations > of that size? For example, I could image THP using huge page sized > reservations. The when it comes time to resize your hugetlbfs pool > there may not be enough. Although, we may quickly split THP pages > in this case. I am not sure. Yup it has a pool for everyone. Question is how to divide the loot ;-) > IIRC, Guy Shattah's use case was for allocations greater than MAX_ORDER. > This would not directly address that. A huge contiguous area (2GB) is > the sweet spot' for best performance in his case. However, I think he > could still benefit from using a set of larger (such as 2MB) size > allocations which this scheme could help with. MAX_ORDER can be increased to allow for larger allocations. IA64 has f.e. a much larger MAX_ORDER size. So does powerpc. And then the reservation scheme will work. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-16 20:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-02-16 16:01 [RFC 0/2] Larger Order Protection V1 Christoph Lameter 2018-02-16 16:01 ` [RFC 1/2] Protect larger order pages from breaking up Christoph Lameter 2018-02-16 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter [not found] ` <20180216160121.519788537-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-16 17:03 ` Andi Kleen 2018-02-16 17:03 ` Andi Kleen [not found] ` <20180216170354.vpbuugzqsrrfc4js-1g7Xle2YJi4/4alezvVtWx2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-16 18:25 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-16 18:25 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-16 19:01 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 19:01 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 20:15 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-16 21:08 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 21:08 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 21:43 ` Matthew Wilcox [not found] ` <20180216214353.GA32655-PfSpb0PWhxZc2C7mugBRk2EX/6BAtgUQ@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-16 21:47 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 21:47 ` Dave Hansen 2018-02-16 18:02 ` Randy Dunlap [not found] ` <b76028c6-c755-8178-2dfc-81c7db1f8bed-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-17 16:07 ` Mike Rapoprt 2018-02-17 16:07 ` Mike Rapoprt 2018-02-16 18:59 ` Mike Kravetz [not found] ` <5108eb20-2b20-bd48-903e-bce312e96974-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-16 20:13 ` Christopher Lameter [this message] 2018-02-16 20:13 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-18 9:00 ` Guy Shattah 2018-02-18 9:00 ` Guy Shattah 2018-02-19 10:19 ` Mel Gorman 2018-02-19 14:42 ` Michal Hocko 2018-02-19 15:09 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-22 21:19 ` Thomas Schoebel-Theuer 2018-02-22 21:53 ` Zi Yan 2018-02-23 2:01 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-23 2:16 ` Zi Yan 2018-02-23 2:45 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-23 9:59 ` Mel Gorman 2018-02-16 16:01 ` [RFC 2/2] Page order diagnostics Christoph Lameter 2018-02-16 16:01 ` Christoph Lameter [not found] ` <20180216160121.583566579-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2018-02-17 21:17 ` Pavel Machek 2018-02-17 21:17 ` Pavel Machek 2018-02-19 14:54 ` Christopher Lameter 2018-02-16 18:27 ` [RFC 0/2] Larger Order Protection V1 Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1802161411440.11934@nuc-kabylake \ --to=cl-vytec60ixjuavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \ --cc=andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org \ --cc=dave.hansen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=dnellans-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=khandual-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \ --cc=labbott-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mel-wJa12IhQEiizQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mike.kravetz-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mina86-deATy8a+UHjQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org \ --cc=riel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=sguy-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=tst-0Nly+W1lFbFDiq0p6IFu4YQuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org \ --cc=vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=willy-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.