[PATCH] cirrus-ci: add FreeBSD 14 task

[PATCH] cirrus-ci: add FreeBSD 14 task

[Roger Pau Monne]

Introduce a task that uses a FreeBSD 14 (HEAD) snapshot.

Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
 .cirrus.yml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/.cirrus.yml b/.cirrus.yml
index 4ae719136e..c38333e736 100644
--- a/.cirrus.yml
+++ b/.cirrus.yml
@@ -24,3 +24,9 @@ task:
   freebsd_instance:
     image_family: freebsd-13-0
   << : *FREEBSD_TEMPLATE
+
+task:
+  name: 'FreeBSD 14'
+  freebsd_instance:
+    image_family: freebsd-14-0-snap
+  << : *FREEBSD_TEMPLATE
-- 
2.35.1

Re: [PATCH] cirrus-ci: add FreeBSD 14 task

[Stefano Stabellini]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 759 bytes --]

On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Introduce a task that uses a FreeBSD 14 (HEAD) snapshot.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>


Roger, should you add an entry to MAINTAINERS to set yourself as
maintainer of .cirrus.yml ?


> ---
>  .cirrus.yml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/.cirrus.yml b/.cirrus.yml
> index 4ae719136e..c38333e736 100644
> --- a/.cirrus.yml
> +++ b/.cirrus.yml
> @@ -24,3 +24,9 @@ task:
>    freebsd_instance:
>      image_family: freebsd-13-0
>    << : *FREEBSD_TEMPLATE
> +
> +task:
> +  name: 'FreeBSD 14'
> +  freebsd_instance:
> +    image_family: freebsd-14-0-snap
> +  << : *FREEBSD_TEMPLATE
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

Re: [PATCH] cirrus-ci: add FreeBSD 14 task

[Roger Pau Monné]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 03:13:13PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Introduce a task that uses a FreeBSD 14 (HEAD) snapshot.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> 
> 
> Roger, should you add an entry to MAINTAINERS to set yourself as
> maintainer of .cirrus.yml ?

It would seem a natural fit to place it in the "Continuous Integration
(CI)" section, but then it being FreeBSD only (at least ATM) I assume
current maintainers won't feel comfortable having it there.

Thanks, Roger.