* network hanging on heavy load
@ 2009-05-28 14:22 John Connor
2009-05-28 14:50 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-06-02 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Connor @ 2009-05-28 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users
can anyone explain this
kernel: INFO: task sirq-net-rx/0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
kernel: sirq-net-rx/0 M (005) [f78660f0] c483b600 [on rq #0] 0 8 2
kernel: f7852e44 00000046 c483b600 c483b600 00000001 00000078 41dd129d
0000015e
kernel: f78660f0 f7866384 c483b600 00000000 f7852000 c0445a58 f5f0e7a4
0000000a
kernel: 00000000 00000000 c48389c0 f5f0e7a0 f7852e64 f5f0e338 f5f0e330
c48389c0
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<c0445a58>] ? __rt_mutex_adjust_prio+0x19/0x1c
kernel: [<c0632f85>] schedule+0xbf/0xd8
kernel: [<c063439d>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x134/0x1eb
kernel: [<c06348c3>] __rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x61
kernel: [<c06348fe>] rt_spin_lock+0x38/0x3b
kernel: [<c04832c5>] kfree+0x29/0x7b
kernel: [<c05bdbdd>] skb_release_data+0x82/0x87
kernel: [<c05be19b>] skb_release_all+0xab/0xae
kernel: [<c05bda81>] __kfree_skb+0xb/0x66
kernel: [<c05bdb0a>] kfree_skb+0x2e/0x30
kernel: [<c05c451f>] dev_kfree_skb_any+0x40/0x42
kernel: [<f8a54e8b>] e1000_put_txbuf+0x52/0x61 [e1000e]
kernel: [<f8a54fed>] e1000_clean_tx_irq+0xae/0x288 [e1000e]
kernel: [<c0421966>] ? finish_task_switch+0x4e/0xf0
kernel: [<f8a55484>] e1000_clean+0x3e/0x1d7 [e1000e]
kernel: [<c05c467d>] net_rx_action+0xa6/0x1af
kernel: [<c042dfec>] ksoftirqd+0x155/0x239
kernel: [<c042de97>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x239
kernel: [<c0439f63>] kthread+0x3b/0x64
kernel: [<c0439f28>] ? kthread+0x0/0x64
kernel: [<c0405803>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
kernel: =======================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: network hanging on heavy load
2009-05-28 14:22 network hanging on heavy load John Connor
@ 2009-05-28 14:50 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-05-28 15:22 ` John Connor
2009-06-02 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich @ 2009-05-28 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Connor; +Cc: linux-rt-users
How much RAM do you have?
Is it a NUMA box?
Sven
+ 1 (415) 694 2930
On May 28, 2009, at 7:22, John Connor <jconnor@gdrs.com> wrote:
> can anyone explain this
>
> kernel: INFO: task sirq-net-rx/0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
> this message.
> kernel: sirq-net-rx/0 M (005) [f78660f0] c483b600 [on rq #0]
> 0 8 2
> kernel: f7852e44 00000046 c483b600 c483b600 00000001 00000078
> 41dd129d
> 0000015e
> kernel: f78660f0 f7866384 c483b600 00000000 f7852000 c0445a58
> f5f0e7a4
> 0000000a
> kernel: 00000000 00000000 c48389c0 f5f0e7a0 f7852e64 f5f0e338
> f5f0e330
> c48389c0
> kernel: Call Trace:
> kernel: [<c0445a58>] ? __rt_mutex_adjust_prio+0x19/0x1c
> kernel: [<c0632f85>] schedule+0xbf/0xd8
> kernel: [<c063439d>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x134/0x1eb
> kernel: [<c06348c3>] __rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x61
> kernel: [<c06348fe>] rt_spin_lock+0x38/0x3b
> kernel: [<c04832c5>] kfree+0x29/0x7b
> kernel: [<c05bdbdd>] skb_release_data+0x82/0x87
> kernel: [<c05be19b>] skb_release_all+0xab/0xae
> kernel: [<c05bda81>] __kfree_skb+0xb/0x66
> kernel: [<c05bdb0a>] kfree_skb+0x2e/0x30
> kernel: [<c05c451f>] dev_kfree_skb_any+0x40/0x42
> kernel: [<f8a54e8b>] e1000_put_txbuf+0x52/0x61 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<f8a54fed>] e1000_clean_tx_irq+0xae/0x288 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<c0421966>] ? finish_task_switch+0x4e/0xf0
> kernel: [<f8a55484>] e1000_clean+0x3e/0x1d7 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<c05c467d>] net_rx_action+0xa6/0x1af
> kernel: [<c042dfec>] ksoftirqd+0x155/0x239
> kernel: [<c042de97>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x239
> kernel: [<c0439f63>] kthread+0x3b/0x64
> kernel: [<c0439f28>] ? kthread+0x0/0x64
> kernel: [<c0405803>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> kernel: =======================
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-
> users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: network hanging on heavy load
2009-05-28 14:50 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
@ 2009-05-28 15:22 ` John Connor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Connor @ 2009-05-28 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users
It is a intel dual core with 2 gig of ram
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: network hanging on heavy load
2009-05-28 14:22 network hanging on heavy load John Connor
2009-05-28 14:50 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
@ 2009-06-02 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-08 14:05 ` John Connor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-06-02 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Connor; +Cc: linux-rt-users
On Thu, 28 May 2009, John Connor wrote:
> can anyone explain this
>
> kernel: INFO: task sirq-net-rx/0:8 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> kernel: sirq-net-rx/0 M (005) [f78660f0] c483b600 [on rq #0] 0 8 2
> kernel: f7852e44 00000046 c483b600 c483b600 00000001 00000078 41dd129d
> 0000015e
> kernel: f78660f0 f7866384 c483b600 00000000 f7852000 c0445a58 f5f0e7a4
> 0000000a
> kernel: 00000000 00000000 c48389c0 f5f0e7a0 f7852e64 f5f0e338 f5f0e330
> c48389c0
> kernel: Call Trace:
> kernel: [<c0445a58>] ? __rt_mutex_adjust_prio+0x19/0x1c
> kernel: [<c0632f85>] schedule+0xbf/0xd8
> kernel: [<c063439d>] rt_spin_lock_slowlock+0x134/0x1eb
> kernel: [<c06348c3>] __rt_spin_lock+0x5e/0x61
> kernel: [<c06348fe>] rt_spin_lock+0x38/0x3b
> kernel: [<c04832c5>] kfree+0x29/0x7b
> kernel: [<c05bdbdd>] skb_release_data+0x82/0x87
> kernel: [<c05be19b>] skb_release_all+0xab/0xae
> kernel: [<c05bda81>] __kfree_skb+0xb/0x66
> kernel: [<c05bdb0a>] kfree_skb+0x2e/0x30
> kernel: [<c05c451f>] dev_kfree_skb_any+0x40/0x42
> kernel: [<f8a54e8b>] e1000_put_txbuf+0x52/0x61 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<f8a54fed>] e1000_clean_tx_irq+0xae/0x288 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<c0421966>] ? finish_task_switch+0x4e/0xf0
> kernel: [<f8a55484>] e1000_clean+0x3e/0x1d7 [e1000e]
> kernel: [<c05c467d>] net_rx_action+0xa6/0x1af
> kernel: [<c042dfec>] ksoftirqd+0x155/0x239
> kernel: [<c042de97>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x239
> kernel: [<c0439f63>] kthread+0x3b/0x64
> kernel: [<c0439f28>] ? kthread+0x0/0x64
> kernel: [<c0405803>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> kernel: =======================
Which kernel version ?
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: network hanging on heavy load
2009-06-02 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2009-06-08 14:05 ` John Connor
2009-06-09 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John Connor @ 2009-06-08 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users
2.6.28-rt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: network hanging on heavy load
2009-06-08 14:05 ` John Connor
@ 2009-06-09 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2009-06-09 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Connor; +Cc: linux-rt-users
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, John Connor wrote:
> 2.6.28-rt
I assume this is the infamous ubuntu 2.6.28-rt kernel ? If yes, then
please ask the ubuntu folks. We never released a 2.6.28-rt patch and
we have really no clue at all what the ubuntu folks hacked together
there.
Please try to build the latest mainstream -rt kernel and report back
when the problem still persists.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-09 21:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-28 14:22 network hanging on heavy load John Connor
2009-05-28 14:50 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-05-28 15:22 ` John Connor
2009-06-02 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-08 14:05 ` John Connor
2009-06-09 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.