[U-Boot] is "CONFIG_OMAP_INNOVATOR" a typo or not?

* [U-Boot] is "CONFIG_OMAP_INNOVATOR" a typo or not?
@ 2009-11-21  7:42 Robert P. J. Day
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-11-21  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: u-boot

  in my travels through OMAP land, i'm still running across what look
like typoes but i'm not sure if they are or if there's something
subtle and funky going on underneath with macro concatenation or
something.

  witness:

$ grep -r CONFIG.*OMAP.*INNOVATOR *
include/configs/omap1510.h:#ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_INNOVATOR
include/configs/omap1610inn.h:#define CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_INNOVATOR	/* Select board mach-type */
include/asm-arm/mach-types.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_INNOVATOR
$

so the last two lines above set and test CONFIG_MACH_OMAP_INNOVATOR,
while that first header file instead tests CONFIG_OMAP_INNOVATOR, for
which there is no other reference anywhere else in the tree.

  can someone clarify what's happening in cases like that, because
it's not the only example i've run across.  thanks.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread