From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for 2.6.33-rc3 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:39:30 -0800 (PST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001081430210.7821@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20100108222715.GC2879@atomide.com> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > $ git log --pretty=oneline --author=".(none)" --committer=".(none)" v2.6.33-rc1.. Well, that will catch one particular common case of it, but.. > Should we have some check like this in place for all pulls? .. it would probably make more sense to warn about it earlier in the chain, so that people with bad configurations can fix them. By the time somebody pulls, it's pretty late in the game. Sadly, git doesn't do any real sanity checking, and now it's pretty much too late. It takes about a year or two for new git versions to percolate out, with things like Debian-stable etc, so making git warn about suspicious-looking names is not necessarily going to help (and with scripting and importing from other SCM's, it may be wrong to warn in general). It's _fairly_ easy to set up a hook at commit-time to check for random thigns, but obviously if the problem is that people haven't configured their git setup, then "add a hook" is not going to work. In that sense, pull-time may be better, as a way to see it automatically after-the-fact. Doing a post-merge hook would catch it, and could be used to warn about the fact that you merged something odd. Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: torvalds@linux-foundation.org (Linus Torvalds) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [GIT PULL] omap fixes for 2.6.33-rc3 Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 14:39:30 -0800 (PST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001081430210.7821@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20100108222715.GC2879@atomide.com> On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > $ git log --pretty=oneline --author=".(none)" --committer=".(none)" v2.6.33-rc1.. Well, that will catch one particular common case of it, but.. > Should we have some check like this in place for all pulls? .. it would probably make more sense to warn about it earlier in the chain, so that people with bad configurations can fix them. By the time somebody pulls, it's pretty late in the game. Sadly, git doesn't do any real sanity checking, and now it's pretty much too late. It takes about a year or two for new git versions to percolate out, with things like Debian-stable etc, so making git warn about suspicious-looking names is not necessarily going to help (and with scripting and importing from other SCM's, it may be wrong to warn in general). It's _fairly_ easy to set up a hook at commit-time to check for random thigns, but obviously if the problem is that people haven't configured their git setup, then "add a hook" is not going to work. In that sense, pull-time may be better, as a way to see it automatically after-the-fact. Doing a post-merge hook would catch it, and could be used to warn about the fact that you merged something odd. Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-08 22:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-01-08 18:09 [GIT PULL] omap fixes for 2.6.33-rc3 Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 18:09 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-01-08 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-01-08 18:22 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 18:22 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 22:05 ` Paul Walmsley 2010-01-08 22:05 ` Paul Walmsley 2010-01-08 22:27 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 22:27 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds [this message] 2010-01-08 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-01-08 22:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 22:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-09 2:47 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-01-09 2:47 ` Stephen Rothwell 2010-01-09 17:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-09 17:28 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 18:20 ` Tony Lindgren 2010-01-08 18:20 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1001081430210.7821@localhost.localdomain \ --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=paul@pwsan.com \ --cc=tony@atomide.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.